On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Michael P. Gerlek wrote:
...
> The board is elected by the charter members to make policy. When the system
> was set up, it was not the intent that charter members had any role other
> than to preserve the nature and mission of the foundation by electing
> approp
oun...@lists.osgeo.org]
>> On Behalf Of Venkatesh Raghavan
>> Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2012 9:58 AM
>> To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org; 'OSGeo-Board'; 'marketing'
>> Subject: Re: [Board] Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Defining an OSGeo Ambassador role
>>
>>
enkatesh Raghavan
> Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2012 9:58 AM
> To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org; 'OSGeo-Board'; 'marketing'
> Subject: Re: [Board] Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Defining an OSGeo Ambassador role
>
> Michael,
>
> On 2012/05/05 23:58, Michael P. Gerlek wrote:
> > Your
Michael,
On 2012/05/05 23:58, Michael P. Gerlek wrote:
Your points have actually been discussed, but so far there hasn't apparently
been enough interest to further push the idea of stronger charter member roles.
"enough interest" in the community or the OSGeo Board?
(Your points (1) and (3
Venka:
Your points have actually been discussed, but so far there hasn't apparently
been enough interest to further push the idea of stronger charter member roles.
(Your points (1) and (3) are already the case, and some people (myself
included) feel that (2) is not desirable right now.)
