Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Promoting freely available geodata

2007-05-13 Thread P Kishor
I am following up on this thread, and cross-posting to several lists -- sorry for the noise -- to inform you all of my related activities. I have spent the past five days in Atibaia, Brazil at a CODATA-organized (http://www.codata.org) workshop on Open Access to Scientific Data

RE: [Geodata] Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Promoting freely available geodata

2007-04-09 Thread Landon Blake
Thanks for that Link Michael. It will be useful. Landon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adair, Mike Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 10:38 AM To: OSGeo Discussions Subject: RE: [Geodata] Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Promoting freely available geodata

RE: [Geodata] Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Promoting freely available geodata

2007-04-08 Thread Adair, Mike
Of Dave Patton Sent: April 1, 2007 2:05 PM To: OSGeo Discussions Subject: Re: [Geodata] Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Promoting freely available geodata Jason Birch wrote: I'm sure that most of you have seen this, but these two free data resources (provincial and federal Canadian governements

Re: [Geodata] Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Promoting freely available geodata

2007-04-01 Thread Dave Patton
Jason Birch wrote: I'm sure that most of you have seen this, but these two free data resources (provincial and federal Canadian governements) are both employing a form of copyleft: Kamloops (Canadian municipality) takes an interesting approach. Given the interest, maybe the 'OSGeo people'

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Promoting freely available geodata

2007-03-31 Thread SteveC
Chris Holmes wrote: Do you have a link to the Database Directive stuff on osm-talk? I checked out the list but there's a lot there and wasn't sure which posts to read. I just got off the phone with the lead counsel of Science Commons, which is the branch of CC made to deal with data. It was

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Promoting freely available geodata

2007-03-31 Thread SteveC
Chris Holmes wrote: Do you have a link to the Database Directive stuff on osm-talk? I checked out the list but there's a lot there and wasn't sure which posts to read. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_directive mostly it just follows from that page... maybe richard could help more?

Re: [Geodata] Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Promoting freely available geodata

2007-03-31 Thread Richard Greenwood
On 3/30/07, Jason Birch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kamloops (Canadian municipality) takes an interesting approach. They have a click-through, but it's not asserting any rights, just disclaiming liability. Their GIS manager explained that they are essentially placing the data into public

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Promoting freely available geodata

2007-03-30 Thread SteveC
Dear all It's incredibly cool that governments are thinking of using CC foe geodata. Our legal-talk and other lists have found a whole ton of problems with it though (we use a CC license in OSM). I'd be super interested in seeing the results and if any lawyers think that they're valid for

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Promoting freely available geodata

2007-03-30 Thread Chris Holmes
Do you have a link to the Database Directive stuff on osm-talk? I checked out the list but there's a lot there and wasn't sure which posts to read. I just got off the phone with the lead counsel of Science Commons, which is the branch of CC made to deal with data. It was an interesting

RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Promoting freely available geodata

2007-03-30 Thread Ned Horning
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Holmes Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 6:59 PM To: OSGeo Discussions Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Legal Talk Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Promoting freely available geodata Do you have a link to the Database Directive stuff on osm-talk? I checked out the list but there's

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Promoting freely available geodata

2007-03-28 Thread nicholas . g . lawrence
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 28/03/2007 04:45:26 PM: On of the aims of OSGeo is the promotion of open geodata. From conversations I've had with various people over time it appears one of the difficulties data providers may have with this is licensing. There's no obvious candidate license for