Dear all,
some thoughts on the proposed changes on the Charter Member election
process.
I will divide my comments into two parts, first some issues about the
process itself and then some comments on the proposed changes.
(A) the process per se:
1/ I think that whatever change in the election
http://www.aag.org/cs/membership/individual_membership
http://www.aag.org/cs/membership/individual_membership/dues
Both simpler, and better for the bottom line of OSGeo, if you want to
be a member, sign up as a member, collect your t-shirt, see you @
foss4g.
P.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:28 AM,
Hi all,
good - and important! - discussion!
Being Charter Member I am somewhat concerned:
- I am surprised that the common democratic procedure of election is perceived
as creating dissent.
- yes, democracy is expensive, but generally it is considered worth the effort.
- is lifelong
hi,
just for the record:
a new article (sorry in german) about OSGeo, OSGeo projects, OSGeo-live,
open data and nature conservation:
http://www.anl.bayern.de/publikationen/anliegen/doc/an36113kudrnovsky_2014_open_data.pdf
best regards
Helmut (OSGeo charter member ;-))
-
best
