However, they (the US govt.) don’t even need a specific legal provision to spy
on data that is hosted outside the US, and they’ve been doing that since
forever…
;-)
From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org]
On Behalf Of Richard Desrochers
Sent: Sunday, M
Yea and eventually North Korea will launch a nuclear weapon at the USA
so better safe than sorry.
Me, I'm looking at the Principality of Sealand.
--
James Fee
http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com
On May 31, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Richard Desrochers wrote:
One thing to consider using a cloud approach
One thing to consider using a cloud approach with Amazon is the license
agreement concerning your data.
Under the Patriot Act in the US all data hosted in the US could be made
available to the US government.
Not all corporations are ready to live with that.
Richard
2009/5/30 Randy George
> Cl
But OGC could, as a service to its membership, work with SC to define
standardized classes of licenses that would help geospatial data
publishers with their licensing needs all along the permissions
spectrum.
---
Raj
On May 30, at 4:53 PM, Ian Turton wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:09 P
At Camptocamp, we have deployed several production instances of web mapping
applications on Amazon. For example, Map veloland (
http://map.veloland.ch/?lang=en) a 100k+ unique visitors/day is hosted this
way and use several OS software (Puppet, HAproxy, MapServer, TileCache,
Pylons, MapFish, GeoExt
> On May 30, 2009, at 3:38 PM, "Randy George" wrote:
>
>> Cloud options are looking interesting.
>>
>> http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/ Windows, Linux, Solaris options
>>
>> I imagine ESRI license entanglement with virtual servers could be a
>> problem. But no problem at all with Open Source GIS stacks