Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] WMS Performance Shootout presentation/results
Smith, Michael ERDC-USACE-NH wrote: We used a static FCGI specification FastCgiServer /var/www/cgi-bin/mapserv.fcgi -processes 8 -initial_env LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:/opt/build/instant_client_11_1/lib:/opt/build /arcsde_c_sdk/lib Mike, I added this info into the shared slides (on the last slide). -jeff -- Jeff McKenna FOSS4G Consulting and Training Services http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/ ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] code sprint before or after the conference
Pick your poison. Before, people are jet lagged and worrying about their talks. After, people are tired and worn out. I would continue to go with a one-day event after. One day is good for sitting down and talking, less good for coding, but the communication is really important. At the 4-day sprint in Toronto, day 1 was mostly used for talking. I think if you want an event that turns out lots of new/fixed code, you need more time, and more fresh people, which means logistically tying it to FOSS4G is never going to be a great idea. Bolsena, Toronto, those are the models that seem to work. P. On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Bart van den Eijnden (OSGIS) ha scritto: >> >> Hi list, >> >> today I was at the code sprint in Sydney, and after a whole week of >> conference with the associated beers and late nights, nothing much >> productive came out of me unfortunately, which was to be expected. >> >> So for next year in Barcelona, I would really appreciate it if the code >> sprint code would be *before* the conference starts. >> >> How do other people feel about this? > > I have the impression the developers that are also giving presentations > or workshops will spend the sprint on conference related stuff ;-) > I for one have been able to make something today, but I wouldn't > have been able to participate at all before the conference. > > Hard to get all people working no matter what the date chosen is I guess, > you'll loose someone anyways I guess we can try to guess > what option provides the least damage? Maybe we can ask people > around what option they would have preferred. > > My money is on the sprint after, since I usually have workshops > and presentations to care for. But that is just me. You'd prefer > to have it before. > What about the others? > > Cheers > Andrea > > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] WMS Performance Shootout presentation/results
Le samedi 24 octobre 2009 à 21:53 +1100, Smith, Michael ERDC-USACE-NH a écrit : > We used a static FCGI specification > > FastCgiServer /var/www/cgi-bin/mapserv.fcgi -processes 8 -initial_env > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:/opt/build/instant_client_11_1/lib:/opt/build > /arcsde_c_sdk/lib > > Mike > > So no particular tweaking. thanks for this piece of info. regards, Guillaume ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] WMS Performance Shootout presentation/results
We used a static FCGI specification FastCgiServer /var/www/cgi-bin/mapserv.fcgi -processes 8 -initial_env LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:/opt/build/instant_client_11_1/lib:/opt/build /arcsde_c_sdk/lib Mike -- Michael Smith RSGIS Center US Army Corps of Engineers w: (603) 646-4765 On 10/24/09 6:36 PM, "Guillaume Sueur" wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for publishing this test for people who couldn't make it to > Sydney. I would be interested in getting the Fcgi configuration of > Mapserver in Apache. Any chance to get that ? > > Regards > > Guillaume > > Le samedi 24 octobre 2009 à 10:39 +1100, Jeff McKenna a écrit : >> For those that did not make it to Sydney, here is the WMS Performance >> Shootout presentation with results (GeoServer vs MapServer): >> >> http://www.slideshare.net/gatewaygeomatics.com/wms-performance-shootout >> >> MapServer: power users who manage MapServer sites with high loads/map >> draws should >> take note of the results of MapServer CGI vs MapServer FastCGI, even in >> the case of Shapefiles and Rasters (yes, quite surprising). >> >> All: a lot of credit should go to Andrea Aime from GeoServer who worked >> very hard in bringing the MapServer team up to speed to learn the >> testing process. It was a great experience and we're already looking >> forward to next year. >> >> -jeff >> >> >> -- >> Jeff McKenna >> FOSS4G Consulting and Training Services >> http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ___ >> mapserver-users mailing list >> mapserver-us...@lists.osgeo.org >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users >> >> > > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] WMS Performance Shootout presentation/results
Hi, Thanks for publishing this test for people who couldn't make it to Sydney. I would be interested in getting the Fcgi configuration of Mapserver in Apache. Any chance to get that ? Regards Guillaume Le samedi 24 octobre 2009 à 10:39 +1100, Jeff McKenna a écrit : > For those that did not make it to Sydney, here is the WMS Performance > Shootout presentation with results (GeoServer vs MapServer): > > http://www.slideshare.net/gatewaygeomatics.com/wms-performance-shootout > > MapServer: power users who manage MapServer sites with high loads/map > draws should > take note of the results of MapServer CGI vs MapServer FastCGI, even in > the case of Shapefiles and Rasters (yes, quite surprising). > > All: a lot of credit should go to Andrea Aime from GeoServer who worked > very hard in bringing the MapServer team up to speed to learn the > testing process. It was a great experience and we're already looking > forward to next year. > > -jeff > > > -- > Jeff McKenna > FOSS4G Consulting and Training Services > http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/ > > > > > > > > > ___ > mapserver-users mailing list > mapserver-us...@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users > > ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss