[OSGeo-Discuss] Need help backporting postgis-1.5.1 to debian lenny using pbuilder

2010-05-20 Thread Stephen Woodbridge

Hi all,

If anyone has any experience pbuilder on debian and/or backporting 
postgis to lenny, I could really use some help. I'm using the pkg-grass 
package definitions. Please contact me off list. If I can get this to 
work, I'd be happy to document the process and post it somewhere.


TIA,
  -Steve
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] fastest option of serving huge imagery on web map on the fly

2010-05-20 Thread miblon
If mapserver is to slow, almost everything else is to slow... I also 
noticed your crosspost on the mapproxy list. mapproxy will even cache to 
more then the 60TB youve estimated, because it will cache every wms 
request instead of square, stitched tiles.


If I where you and caching is an issue, I would invest in a (small) farm 
of fast cgi mapserver servers with for instance a squid proxy in front.
One single machine will always be to slow. You say nothing about the 
hardware. I for instance use i7 950 servers with 12Gb ram and 3Tb 
diskspace for €89 a month.


- Search for the best hardware at acceptable price
- Consider setting up less servers with more diskspace per server and 
concider using cache if you find out that the cost of individual high 
end large disks (with in total enough space to hold 120Tb or so) are 
lower then setting up 4 individual machines with less diskspace barely 
fitting your initial dataset, consider that too.
- Upscale when needed. You say you have 4.7 Tb of imagery, how big is 
the target audience? Will they be viewing the entire image set up to the 
highest detail or will there be a limited "Area of interest"? I would 
say that it is pointless to create a infrastructure capable of holding 
the highest level of detail given the amount of disk space when only a 
hundred users will be active..

- Find an investor

In my opinion, you are on top of imagery that is of invaluable worth to 
your audience. Why would they want to cut on the infrastructure costs?


Sounds a bit like; we want a money-transport truck, but we would not 
want to invest in armoring it and giving it an engine to outrun any bandits.


I think someone needs to do some good presales work here and set up an 
excellent business case.


Good luck!

Kind regards,

Milo van der Linden

karsten vennemann wrote:

Hi All,
 
I am seeking some advice/ alternative ideas about the following 
project I am working on...
I have been tasked with researching the best and fastest options 
serving huge raster datasets on a web map using OpenLayers o the fly 
(using all Open Source software). We want to serve the US NAIP Aerials 
in 1m resolution (which are a total of about 4.7 TB of MrSid/Jp2 data) 
on a interactive  web map as an optional map background. The are using 
MapServer to serve our other  (vector) data such as roads, rivers etc 
as WMS  to overlay onto this. Of course there are many ways to go 
about this but one of the things we determined early on is that 
MapServer is too slow to serve compressed imagery such as the native 
MrSid Jp2 imagery on the fly for our needs. Thus, one option would be 
to spare MapServer from having to decompress the images. We can then 
also avoid having to convert them to tiff and adding overviews (using 
gdaladdo for example). This would also "blow up" the total data volume 
to something about 60 TB ...
Thus, we are in the process of researching options on how to serve the 
compressed data as fast as possible "on the fly" and without the need 
for caching them on disk (that means no TileCache nor GeoWebCache 
should be used because that also would involve having to set up huge 
storage spaces ...
One option I came about was using IIpimage server and this would then 
involve converting the MrSid all to Jp2 format. One advantage is that 
OpenLayers 2.9 already has natively the Zoomify layer support so that 
we can easily add the images coming out of IIPImage Server Zoomify + 
JPEG2000 server http://help.oldmapsonline.org/jpeg2000/
I also found that another option is the Djatoka Jpeg 2000 Image Server 
http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/djatoka/index.php?title=Main_Page 
and the J2K Tiler Renderer: 
http://dltj.org/article/introducing-j2ktilerenderer/.
None of the above seem to enable output as WMS (correct me if I'm 
wrong). One draw back is that all of those above are using the Kakadu 
library which is great but not free for commercial use.
I also wanted to research how the use of this new proxy server 
http://mapproxy.org/ could improve our speed in combination with e.g. 
IIP Image server...
 
Anybody has experiences with any of the above or comments ?
Any input what you think would be the fastest option to serve 
the compressed US NAIP onto a web map on the fly (without caching 
tiles on disk) ?
 
Cheers

Karsten


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
  


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] fastest option of serving huge imagery on web mapon the fly

2010-05-20 Thread Bob Basques
All, 

We went through this same exercise a few years back, and in the end just opted 
for Jpegs in a pyramid tile set behind the scenes with MapServer as the 
assembly service.  We had specific needs of being able to assemble seamless 
images from the aerials in any size and paid a lot of attention to dropping 
pixels vs adding them with Mapserver (one process is faster than the other). 

This setup has been serving us well for years. 

GUI interface (public version) is here: 

 http://gis.ci.stpaul.mn.us/gis/gismo_public/html/ 

Try one of the default 5 layers in the Backgrounds folder. 

Here is a direct link to one of them: 

http://gis.ci.stpaul.mn.us/datasets/RASTER/SAINT_PAUL/PUBLIC_WORKS/AERIAL_CITIPIX/citipix_2001_public.map?mapext=572170.3096850861%20154364.2202090687%20574347.789661319%20157490.94035167122&mapsize=679%20975&mode=map
 ( 
http://gis.ci.stpaul.mn.us/datasets/RASTER/SAINT_PAUL/PUBLIC_WORKS/AERIAL_CITIPIX/citipix_2001_public.map?mapext=572170.3096850861%20154364.2202090687%20574347.789661319%20157490.94035167122&mapsize=679%20975&mode=map
 ) 

Our outside network is the slow part of the process.  Internally, the last link 
above takes 918ms to load in a browser. 

Here's a bigger one: 

http://gis.ci.stpaul.mn.us/datasets/RASTER/SAINT_PAUL/PUBLIC_WORKS/AERIAL_CITIPIX/citipix_2001_public.map?mapext=570924.4319667261%20154282.5149295%20575593.667379679%20157572.71610924698&mapsize=1456%201026&mode=map
 ( 
http://gis.ci.stpaul.mn.us/datasets/RASTER/SAINT_PAUL/PUBLIC_WORKS/AERIAL_CITIPIX/citipix_2001_public.map?mapext=570924.4319667261%20154282.5149295%20575593.667379679%20157572.71610924698&mapsize=1456%201026&mode=map
 ) 
(1.56s) 

and a still bigger one: 

http://gis.ci.stpaul.mn.us/datasets/RASTER/SAINT_PAUL/PUBLIC_WORKS/AERIAL_CITIPIX/citipix_2001_public.map?mapext=569231.1927510398%20153621.824605979%20577286.9065953654%20158233.33595476093&mapsize=2512%201438&mode=map
 ( 
http://gis.ci.stpaul.mn.us/datasets/RASTER/SAINT_PAUL/PUBLIC_WORKS/AERIAL_CITIPIX/citipix_2001_public.map?mapext=569231.1927510398%20153621.824605979%20577286.9065953654%20158233.33595476093&mapsize=2512%201438&mode=map
 ) 
(4.56s) 

I also have them in WMS if you like. 

What type of performance levels are you looking for?  The above is running on 
some now outdated hardware as well. 

bobb 





___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


[OSGeo-Discuss] fastest option of serving huge imagery on web map on the fly

2010-05-20 Thread karsten vennemann
Hi All,
 
I am seeking some advice/ alternative ideas about the following project I am 
working on...
I have been tasked with researching the best and fastest options serving huge 
raster datasets on a web map using OpenLayers o the fly (using all Open Source 
software). We want to serve the US NAIP Aerials in 1m resolution (which are a 
total of about 4.7 TB of MrSid/Jp2 data) on a interactive  web map as an 
optional map background. The are using MapServer to serve our other  (vector) 
data such as roads, rivers etc as WMS  to overlay onto this. Of course there 
are many ways to go about this but one of the things we determined early on is 
that MapServer is too slow to serve compressed imagery such as the native MrSid 
Jp2 imagery on the fly for our needs. Thus, one option would be to spare 
MapServer from having to decompress the images. We can then also avoid having 
to convert them to tiff and adding overviews (using gdaladdo for example). This 
would also "blow up" the total data volume to something about 60 TB ...
Thus, we are in the process of researching options on how to serve the 
compressed data as fast as possible "on the fly" and without the need for 
caching them on disk (that means no TileCache nor GeoWebCache should be used 
because that also would involve having to set up huge storage spaces ...
One option I came about was using IIpimage server and this would then involve 
converting the MrSid all to Jp2 format. One advantage is that OpenLayers 2.9 
already has natively the Zoomify layer support so that we can easily add the 
images coming out of IIPImage Server Zoomify + JPEG2000 server 
http://help.oldmapsonline.org/jpeg2000/
I also found that another option is the Djatoka Jpeg 2000 Image Server 
http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/djatoka/index.php?title=Main_Page and the 
J2K Tiler Renderer: http://dltj.org/article/introducing-j2ktilerenderer/. 
None of the above seem to enable output as WMS (correct me if I'm wrong). One 
draw back is that all of those above are using the Kakadu library which is 
great but not free for commercial use.
I also wanted to research how the use of this new proxy server 
http://mapproxy.org/ could improve our speed in combination with e.g. IIP Image 
server... 
 
Anybody has experiences with any of the above or comments ?
Any input what you think would be the fastest option to serve the compressed US 
NAIP onto a web map on the fly (without caching tiles on disk) ?
 
Cheers
Karsten
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss