Hi Cameron:
You should find that an official marketing template is already available as
part of the work the graphics designed has done. My trouble is that I have not
seen it in open office yet.
Jody
On 04/06/2010, at 9:34 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
> For the OSGeo Live DVD that we are develo
On 06/06/10 12:23, Jody Garnett wrote:
I am also happy to see the marketing committee engaging with projects
directly; I hope they also have some volunteer hours for writing and
are not expecting developers to step away from their core
responsibility to the codebase.
Jody,
Our aim is to create
On 06/06/10 10:14, Jason Birch wrote:
IMHO getting into rating projects is just asking for trouble,
infighting, bitterness, and people/projects walking away from OSGeo.
Jason, this is a valid concern with decent founding. However I think the
potential for conflict is not as bad as you may th
Agreed on it being a hassle.
However the OSGeo foundation also has a responsibility to users - who *really*
want to see a feature list and to be able to compare projects. The foundation
can take steps to help projects communicate - and this is the task/mandate of
the marketing committee.
Compe
Wow, I'm really having opinions this week :)
IMHO getting into rating projects is just asking for trouble, infighting,
bitterness, and people/projects walking away from OSGeo.
Jason
On 5 June 2010 16:37, Cameron Shorter wrote:
> Andrea and others, does this fit with people's expectations?
>
___
On 06/06/10 05:10, Andrea Aime wrote:
Cameron Shorter ha scritto:
For the OSGeo LiveDVD and OSGeo marketing material, I propose we use
a 5 star maturity rating. This is because it is too difficult to
explain in a couple of words, the difference between: "Graduated",
"In Incubation", "Stable",
Arnulf,
I agree that we should only have one marketing template, which will
provide content for a pdf/paper flier, a HTML description for the OSGeo
LiveDVD, and an Open Office Text (odt) format, which can be cut&pasted
into various other uses, like System Integrators' marketing material.
The
Cameron Shorter ha scritto:
For the OSGeo LiveDVD and OSGeo marketing material, I propose we use a 5
star maturity rating. This is because it is too difficult to explain in
a couple of words, the difference between: "Graduated", "In Incubation",
"Stable", "Beta"
Again, I'm interested to hear co
Arnulf,
Yes, I like both of those options.
I think my initial reaction was because it implied that a project was
only supported by a single commercial entity, which isn't healthy. But
I can definitely see the need to meet the use cases you've outlined.
It makes a lot of sense to encourage/enable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cameron,
this should be tied directly to the project overviews / info sheets [1]
that are already available on the OSGeo website and "should" be
maintained by the projcets themselves. Tyler has provided really nicely
layouted templates to do just this.
10 matches
Mail list logo
