Hei,
what I miss:
- a line on supported platforms
- not sure if applicable to all: supported customization/scipting
languages (if not too geeky)
and, I like it to be a OpenOffice doc, though Adobe Illustrator is fine
for me too.
stefan
___
On 07/06/10 05:29, Stefan Steiniger wrote:
what I miss:
- a line on supported platforms
- not sure if applicable to all: supported customization/scipting
languages (if not too geeky)
Good suggestions Stefan, I've added to the source Open Office doc here:
Jason / Cameron,
From the potential utiliser / implementer viewpoint:
I'd like to think that any project that has graduated OSGeo Incubation could be
considered a quality project with all of the vectors described by Andrea.
This proposed rating system implies that this may not be the case.
i think we need more art to the design template, this is more techical guy
marketing with OSGeo logo
we need more green to the templte
F
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
I'm also not too keen on a star ranking system, especially if it is
mostly based on having passed incubation or not.
To me, passing incubation is more an indication of good process
management and long term viability than an indication of software
quality/robustness and ability to really solve
Jason,
I agree that it is important that any rating system has had a lot of
thought put behind it, which is why I've suggested using the existing
OSGeo graduation rating system - which has had input from many of us in
the OSGeo community.
I do think that Andrea has highlighted a couple of
The ODF adoption/marketing committee of OASIS would be ever so annoyed about
your referencing ODF as the OpenOffice.org format as the whole point is that
OpenDocument is not a memory dump of an application converted to some vague
approximation of XML, but a genuine open standard which
