Sorry the rant was not clear; I expect the test taker to be proficient at QGIS.
I was just taking the time to describe how the test would be different from a
normal certification test.
The actual testing criteria would need to be set by those offering training
courses; or perhaps by the QGIS PM
All,
My thoughts on the Incubation process (which are in the archives over the
years) was generally that it was too big a step in many cases for projects to
take. I've always wondered about some sort of process that could last much
longer and with many more steps in it before being declared
On 6/13/2011 4:41 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
Indeed the main benefit of certification here would be as an income
draw to keep
OSGeo going.
This is also interesting: currently we are using the surplus from
courses to partly
finance our (mainly QGIS) development. I do not think redirecting
these reso
Just to follow up on this Landon: I was going to raise a "issue" for the
geotools project to mark annual report down as a task. Do you have any
details, or deadlines which I can fill in? Or should I wait for someone to
contact me.
Jody
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Sunburned Surveyor <
sunburne
Thanks for putting up with my rant(s); I gave up on email and assembled this
stuff into a blog post:
- http://how2map.blogspot.com/2011/06/osgeo-stay-out-of-training-pros-and.html
Jody ___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo
> > Indeed the main benefit of certification here would be as an income draw to
> > keep
> > OSGeo going.
> This is also interesting: currently we are using the surplus from courses to
> partly
> finance our (mainly QGIS) development. I do not think redirecting these
> resources to
> OSGeo would
Il 12/06/2011 16:56, Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Indeed the main benefit of certification here would be as an income draw to
> keep
> OSGeo going.
This is also interesting: currently we are using the surplus from courses to
partly
finance our (mainly QGIS) development. I do not think redirecting
