Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Xlink 1.1 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-04-24 Thread Stefano Costa
Il 24/04/2012 12:42, Stefano Costa ha scritto: ... I cannot but ask myself: WTF?? First OGC takes a disruptive decision, IIUC this is changing the existing standards without issuing a new version of them (or, if this is not the case, Mr. Reed needs to rephrase heavily its writing), and then they

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Xlink 1.1 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-04-24 Thread Stefano Costa
Il 24/04/2012 12:22, Bruce Bannerman ha scritto: Please note Carl Reed’s blog on OGC’s policy and timeline to move to Xlink 1.1: Quoting from Reed's blog: Concurrently, we need aggressive OUTREACH, OUTREACH, OUTREACH to inform and educate the implementation and user community. For example, w

[OSGeo-Discuss] Xlink 1.1 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-04-24 Thread Bruce Bannerman
Please note Carl Reed's blog on OGC's policy and timeline to move to Xlink 1.1: http://www.opengeospatial.org/blog/1597 Bruce Bannerman ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

[OSGeo-Discuss] Re: [SoC] 22 students accepted for OSGeo Google Summer of Code 2012

2012-04-24 Thread Jorge Gaspar Sanz Salinas
On 23 April 2012 22:48, Anne Ghisla wrote: > Hello all, and sorry for cross-posting, > > let me warmly welcome the 22 accepted students and their mentors for > this edition of Google Summer of Code! > This is a record for OSGeo GSoC, together with GSoC itself, that > accepted 1212 students. > > In