Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Proposed process for selecting OSGeo charter members [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

Hi Cameron, I agree that on re-read the new wording covers this. Bruce From: Cameron Shorter mailto:cameron.shor...@gmail.com>> Date: Friday, 4 July 2014 9:01 am To: Bruce Bannerman mailto:b.banner...@bom.gov.au>> Cc: Discuss OSGeo mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org>>, "bo...@lists.osgeo.org

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Proposed process for selecting OSGeo charter members [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

Hi Bruce, I agree that a nominating member should explain why a candidate is worth voting for (rather than a candidate promoting themselves). I think the words below address that. If you can think of a better way of expressing your intent, can you please suggest alternative wording. On 3/07/2

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Membership fee (was: Proposed process for selecting OSGeo charter members)

Mateusz, [and others], thanks for your reaction, On 02-07-14 11:44, Mateusz Łoskot wrote: > On 1 July 2014 18:46, Dirk Frigne wrote: >> [...] >> I may be naive, but for me personally this works out well, and having >> that feeling is one of the important incentives to keep contributing to >> th