Hi everyone,
currently there is some discussion on the board list that really belongs on the
general discuss list. Cameron has put a summary in an e-mail which got sent to
the wrong list (OGC TC discuss instead of OSGeo discuss), I’m forwarding it
below as a starting point for discussion.
This proposal of requiring over 50% of charter members voting yes seems
extraordinarily onerous. Most of our elected officials in Canada would never
get elected under that rule. Without knowing what % of charter members
typically vote in the elections I cannot comment on what I think that the
Hi Bart, Bob, Jeff and the entire OSGeo community,
I'm currently summarizing all the past and current
procedures/rules/ideas/worries/statistics regarding the election process
and put the information in one coherent message for our community. Right
now, I find very difficult for the charter
Hi Bob,
I agree with your assessment.
Maybe last year’s statistics can shed some light on your questions?
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Election_2014_detailed_results
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Election_2014_detailed_results
Best regards,
Bart
On 22 Jun 2015, at 20:42, Bruce, Bob (CWS)
Hi Bart,
Thanks for bringing this to the Discuss list.
To clarify, I am pasting my proposal below, that was sent to the OSGeo
Board on 25 May, that is just now beginning discussion. This year's CRO
(person in charge of the voting process) is Vasile Craciunescu, who will
soon have more
