+1
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Eli Adam wrote:
> Vasile,
>
> Great work pulling this together.
>
> We keep calling this discussion things like "Charter member elections"
> and addressing it during election periods. I think that topic is
> really something else, "the nature and types of OS
Hi Maxi and Eli,
I like Maxi's clarification of charter member involvement. I see
similarities with:
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Board_of_Directors#Suggested_involvement_from_board_members
(I found this list, originally started by Arnulf, to be very useful when
I was considering involvement wit
Thanks Eli,
I agree with you about the distinction between "Participants" and "Members".
While participants are those that are working with open source technologies
in the geospatial field (I know many people that don't care of OSGeo but
follow many list of open source projects or topics because t
Dear All,
don't forget about the moral task of Charter members, to be an advocate of
OSGeo and FOSS4G.
I would keep OSGeo membership, those who are not contributing code,
documentation, etc. to a project, membership is the only way to express their
connection to OSGeo.
It is more than just t