I've no problem people discussing this - just them expecting to influence
decision makers :-)
Ian
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 1:43 PM Pericles Nacionales naci0...@umn.edu
wrote:
I would have thought discussions like this is perfect for this list. It is
of general interest and it reaches a lot
Hi,
I'm looking at the survey too and feel a bit the same as Peter. The first
question seems to suggest transforming current Charter membership into regular
membership, but following questions seem to leave open the possibility for the
2 kinds of membership.
Perhaps the first question should
I would have thought discussions like this is perfect for this list. It is
of general interest and it reaches a lot more people. I'd say discuss away.
-Perry
On Jul 30, 2015 11:28 AM, Dan Ames dan.a...@byu.edu wrote:
Fascinating discussion, though I agree with David that is belongs on the
I've stayed out of the pre-survey discussions on charter membership and
whatnot, but after taking the survey yesterday, I’m starting to think that
OSGeo has accomplished what it set out to do some years ago, and as
currently construed OSGeo will no longer serve a useful purpose.
Back
. I chose a core piece of infrastructure, download.osgeo.org
The following is a list of individual logins, and the apparent date of last
activity (on that machine).
Since the purpose of download.osgeo.org is outward facing, its probably fair to
use this metric in public.
(note that since one
Dear Colleagues,
We are very happy to inform that the first Geo4All newsletter is now ready at
http://opensourcegeospatial.icaci.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Newsletter-vol.-1-no.-1.pdf
Our sincere thanks to Dr. Nikos Lambrinos (Aristotle University of
Thessaloniki, Greece) for taking the
Hi Vasile all,
having tried to fill in the questionnaire I see one main issue: It seems like
OSGeo Charter membership = OSGeo membership.
Not sure it is intended, as my feeling (which may be wrong) is that a Charter
member is more like an advisory board member whereas general membership is where
