Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-10 Thread P Kishor
If the response had been enthusiastic then perhaps your help wouldn't have been needed. That you think the response was mixed/tepid and that it could have been better is perfect reason for you to jump in and take leadership here. I seriously can't think of a better, ahem, response and suggestion

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-10 Thread Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX)
Too bad, this seems a good opportunity to put our poopprint-footprint into perspective and help stimulate consideration of ways to accomplish our need for interaction, obviously quality virtual participation being the alternative. Not to exclude the benefits of a physical meeting but allow for

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-10 Thread Jonathan Moules
Hi Even, I'm not averse to the notion, but given the mixed/tepid response to this email thread, it doesn't seem like something the community has any particular desire for. Cheers, Jonathan On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 16:18:32 + Even Rouaulteven.roua...@spatialys.com wrote