I've installed TracSpamPlugin globally and prepared every instance
so that project trac admins can enable the plugin autonomously
(required a database structure upgrade for spam management tables).
See https://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/SpamFilter for usage instructions.
--strk;
Hi Peter,
Could you please answer Even and Johan's question.
I'm happy to use another term for the governance model.
"Does one person have ultimate control over the project? Or does
ultimate control lie with a committee, possibly with a tie breaker vote
designated to one person or one role (eg
Le mercredi 04 mai 2016 20:39:30, Paolo Corti a écrit :
> > I tend to agree with Patrick's position. I think what matters in the end
> > is the license the code is released, as long as forking is allowed,
> > whether is a committee or a single person taking decisions about
> > developing may lead o
>
> I tend to agree with Patrick's position. I think what matters in the end is
> the license the code is released, as long as forking is allowed, whether is
> a committee or a single person taking decisions about developing may lead or
> may not to a successful project according to several factors
Evan wrote: "Actually reading http://www.rasdaman.org/wiki/Governance it
seems the sentence
that cause trouble is "Should such consent exceptionally not be reached then
Peter Baumann has a casting vote." Does that mean that in case there's a tie
in voting (which cannot happen with a 3 member PSC as
Le mercredi 04 mai 2016 18:34:27, Peter Baumann a écrit :
> HI Cameron,
>
> first, as this word has been used too often now, the current model has
> nothing at all to do with dictatorship. What is the suggested opposite,
> BTW - "dictatorship of majorities"? ;-)
Actually reading http://www.rasdam
>From the discussion so far it sounds as all that is needed is for Rasdaman
to designate it's collection of committers as a PSC and carry on with out
all this fuss.
There is no restriction on how many people you have on your PSC if you can
manage them. And it is worth noting that the current PSCs d
HI Cameron,
first, as this word has been used too often now, the current model has nothing
at all to do with dictatorship. What is the suggested opposite, BTW -
"dictatorship of majorities"? ;-)
If it would at least be called a "technocracy", that I could accept: rasdaman
has always been driven b
Hi Peter,
Are you open to considering relinquishing rasdaman's current "benevolent
dictator" governance model?
Many (most?) OSGeo projects that I'm aware of are managed similarly to
your description below.
There is usually a sage or two amongst the community, typically someone
who founded the
yes Sir!
Am 2016-05-04 11:32, schrieb Jachym Cepicky:
Hi Till,
conference committee established - please join in
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Conference-Europe [5]
st 4. 5. 2016 v 9:51 odesílatel napsal:
Hi Jachym,
great to go forward with this. Id say: Will not be in Bonn ;-)
We should
Hi Till,
conference committee established - please join in
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Conference-Europe
st 4. 5. 2016 v 9:51 odesílatel napsal:
> Hi Jachym,
>
> great to go forward with this. I'd say: Will not be in Bonn ;-)
>
> We should establish kind of Conference Committee, that at least
Hi Jachym,
great to go forward with this. I'd say: Will not be in Bonn ;-)
We should establish kind of Conference Committee, that at least
assesses the proposals and does the voting.
How was the procedure up now?
Till
Am 2016-05-04 08:56, schrieb Jachym Cepicky:
Hi,
yes, its time to st
12 matches
Mail list logo
