Congratulations Howard!
Mateusz
On Sat, 1 Jul 2023, 19:02 Astrid Emde (OSGeo) via Discuss, <
discuss@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
> See News Item 2023-07-01
>
> https://www.osgeo.org/foundation-news/howard-butler-receives-the-2023-sol-katz-award/
>
> We are honoured to announce that Howard Butler is
Congratulations to the new Charter Members!
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, 19:54 Astrid Emde (OSGeo) via Discuss, <
discuss@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
> Newsitem:
>
> https://www.osgeo.org/foundation-news/welcoming-our-new-osgeo-charter-members-
has indicated they would be
> willing to move it to the MapLibre project, if it makes sense. No guarantee
> it moves to MapLibre yet, but definitely that there will be an active fork
> going forward.
Luke, thanks for the update, it sounds very good!
Best
.
I'm late to the party and still making sense of what is the current
status of the parts of the Mapbox GL ecosystem.
Thanks
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
dependencies required to build the existing open sources of the Mapbox
ecosystem for mobile platforms [2]
[1]
https://forum.f-droid.org/t/updated-distribution-license-for-mapbox-mobile-maps-sdk/10201
[2] https://github.com/mapbox/mapbox-gl-native-android/issues/631
Best regards,
--
for your project?
This is "the public list to talk about the Open Source Geospatial
Foundation (OSGeo) in general" with many subscribers who are not
interested in programming or any other low-level technical trivias.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
__
rce. It also
> includes a token financial contribution - enough to take the family out for
> dinner at a nice restaurant.
>
> Well done Jo and Jared, you really deserve it:
Congratulations!
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
he libLAS test data should include older versions like 1.1
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 18:34, Pierre Abbat wrote:
>
> On Friday, 28 February 2020 09:59:12 EST Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> > Unusual, very.
>
> https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WhyNotGPLForManuals
Well, GPL, that explains why I had no idea of such an approach.
Best re
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020, 15:36 Pierre Abbat, wrote:
> On Friday, 28 February 2020 02:40:30 EST Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> > Are you considering separate licences, one for source code
> > and one for documentation?
>
> Yes.
Unusual, very.
ML
__
ch
> license should I use, and is it sufficient to put a statement of license in
> the
> files without putting the license itself in them?
Are you considering separate licences, one for source code
and one for documentation?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http
Forwarding IIIF community event info
-- Forwarded message -
From: Mr. Stace D Maples
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020, 23:29
Subject: [IIIF-Discuss] [Agenda] IIIF Community Call 2/26 - Maps
To: iiif-disc...@googlegroups.com
2020-02-26 IIIF Maps Community Call
17:00pm CEST / 16:00pm UK
209%40iiif.io?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
.
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
, CA 94305
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
uch
non-kosher features like PostGIS Raster to allow FOSS-purist skip
them.
The whole thread feels like an internal scramble for external witch hunt.
[1] http://blog.kathyreid.id.au/2010/07/19/open-source-in-name-only/
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Losko
> The "like Photoshop, only better" motto I like even when it contains
> the name because it explicitly bashes it :)
OSGeo Sponsors:
2007:Autodesk,LizardTech,INGRES
2008:Autodesk,LizardTech,INGRES,PCI Geomatics
2009: -//-
2010: -//-
...
Sandro, I'm glad you can cope wit
ry for the confusion Mat!
No problem. Good it's not a security issue.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
s like a viable explanation (should have looked more
carefully at the headers).
> Why would nabble have your details?
Perhaps it's since my Nabble admin admin times
and my e-mail has not been removed from nab...@osgeo.org.
Anyway, thanks Jody
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://
6929063815-3819232~40n6.nabble.com+noreply~40sourceforge.net+457910...@n6.nabble.com
...
--
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
g, perhaps ?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
t the seconding idleness :)
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Hi,
I'd like to second Joana Simões nomination
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
September/thread.html
*That* is how it started.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
SGeo previously, but was not
> really specific about to any particular project.
>
I recalled, that was/used to be majority of choices.
I did that too.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@
usability but also respecting the CC-by-A license on our photos).
I don't mind a change, if anyone wants to lead one.
I have never used Google Photos, so I have no idea if it can aggregate
photos from numerous users as Flickr group does.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://
On 28 August 2017 at 15:54, Jeffrey Johnson <ortel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Happy to help and to 'represent' the marketing committee here.
Done, you're in. Thanks
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing lis
regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
On 2017-05-11 9:35 AM, Luís Moreira de Sousa wrote:
> Is there any resource within the OSGeo cosmos to help hiring freelance
> developers from our community? For instance, an index of folk certified
> by Arnulf?
Does Arnulf run a certification program?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Los
On 25 March 2017 at 13:01, Paolo Cavallini <cavall...@faunalia.it> wrote:
> Il 25/03/2017 12:56, Mateusz Loskot ha scritto:
>
>> They do, but at the same time, we wouldn't be where we are now
>> in terms of civilisation development. yin/yang
>
> Not quite sure ab
On 25 March 2017 at 12:54, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 12:43:29PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>
>> without a secret, there is no technology advancement
>
> I think this is a purely ideological position.
>
> Secrets can generate al
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
On 20 March 2017 at 21:02, Cameron Shorter <cameron.shor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've added a line for OSGeo-Live
FYI, I only walked through the ones in the "OSGeo Projects" frame at osgeo.org.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http:/
On 20 March 2017 at 00:46, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Geotools SVN has been migrated. The repo is just for historical record.
Fixed. Thanks Jody.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mai
d CI column with list of CI services used,
but eventually ended up with CI tag in GitHub column.
In majority if not all cases, if a project uses Travis CI/AppVeyor
it does it via GitHub.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss
necessary.
Thanks all in advance!
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Hi,
Congratulations all the new board members!
Best regards,
Mateusz Loskot
On 5 October 2016 at 11:17, Suchith Anand
<suchith.an...@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
> Thank you to everyone who participated in the elections.
>
> Congratulations to the new Board.
>
> Bes
ion.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Hi,
Since many of OSGeo members use Gmane, this is relevant
Gmane has been under attack and Lars, the founder of Gmane,
is considering to shut it down:
https://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/2016/07/28/the-end-of-gmane/
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
ing the quality of the data for validity,
accuracy, completeness,
consistency and uniformity, to clean the OpenStreetMap data for a part
of the world
that you care about.
"""
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
__
On 19 May 2016 at 15:30, Yves Jacolin <yjaco...@free.fr> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What is a mantra? Sorry for so this naive question :)
http://www.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/ldap_create_user.py
See the note starting with "Due to..."
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot,
On 16 May 2016 at 10:13, oshanisinga <oshanisi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please be kind enough to take me off the mailing list
Please, you can do it yourself here
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
At the bottom, follow "To unsubscribe from Discuss, "
Best r
..)
A benevolent dictatorship is not considered a suitable open and
consensus based approach to governance."
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
On 15 April 2016 at 14:51, Sandro Santilli <s...@keybit.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 02:21:22PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>
>> Finally, GitHub, wins: feature-wise, marketing-wise, with 'zero' maintenance
>> - most, if not all, of our projects already prefer
[1]https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GitInfrastructureComparison
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
seem resource
efficient, unless majority of OSGeo projects say they would move
from OSgeo SVN (and GitHub too).
No critical mass, nothing to discuss.
[1] http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1214#comment:3
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
like to repeat here too:
you've done amazing job organizing the Paris sprint.
It was a perfect combination of work and fun which also,
AFAIS, was very productive event for the numerous projects.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
with huge & rich organization behind,
that has to prove it's capable to secure market share, and its position.
Otherwise, the parent organization will simply shut it down as any
failed project.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
ributors, not only on GitHub but our Trac too,
could potentially be removed by allowing a hybrid authentication
(i.e. sign in to Trac w/ your existing account on other social services),
if Trac provides support for that.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://
discussion.
>
> What would be useful to OSGeo projects?
Yes, I guess so.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
urceForge infrastructure was
unfriendly, badly designed,
with lack of proper UX approach. Switch to the "awesome UX" platform
like GitHub released
those dormant potential.
The new benefits introduced new costs in peer reviews and maintenance.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http:
On 17 October 2015 at 10:22, Sandro Santilli <s...@keybit.net> wrote:
> Given the number of OSGeo projects that are moving their code outside
> of OSGeo infrastructure, Mateusz Loskot on IRC suggested to include
> guidelines about what is or ins't accepted as a code repository
>
On 17 October 2015 at 21:34, Anita Graser <anitagra...@gmx.at> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Sandro Santilli <s...@keybit.net> wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 05:06:54PM +0200, Anita Graser wrote:
>> > On Oct 17, 2015 12:10 PM, "Mateusz
On 17 Oct 2015 17:06, "Anita Graser" <anitagra...@gmx.at> wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2015 12:10 PM, "Mateusz Loskot" <mate...@loskot.net> wrote:
> >
> > Finally, with Sandro, we brainstormed idea of surveing the Community
> > about their hosting n
.
Yes, indeed.
It may be also worth to observe the differences between FOSS vs OSS,
and that there is no mention of "Free" on the http://www.osgeo.org front page.
Please, notice there is OSI, not FSF, logo on
http://www.osgeo.org/content/foundation/about.html.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Lo
On 6 Oct 2015 18:28, "Paul Ramsey" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Barry Rowlingson
> wrote:
> > Okay, this is probably sticking a match under a pile of dry wood but
> > here goes...
> >
> > Can we rename The FOSS4G Conference
is the Go To for all your FOSS4G needs.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Regina
>
>
>
> From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:
discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Mateusz Loskot
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 3:45 PM
> To: Paul Ramsey <pram...@c
geo.org/wiki/FOSS4G
FOSS4G was not born by, but it FOSS4G started independently.
FOSS4G is not a new conference, and its name is well-established.
IMO, any confuson is artificial.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss
oubt it.
My comment is just a bit of wish that some purists would change their tone.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
r the great job, and support :)
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
s given at events around the World.
On the other, we gradually move to proprietary infrastructure based
on non-FOSS, namely GitHub.
The two sides clash, don't they?
People may get confused.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
I have filled the survey matching my answers ad close to my views as
possible but I also give +1 to agree with Frank's comments
3 sie 2015 18:39 Frank Warmerdam warmer...@pobox.com napisał(a):
Folks,
For what it's worth, I also do not feel comfortable with completing
the survey as it is
On 21 December 2013 21:15, Brent Wood pcr...@pcreso.com wrote:
Click on two points to display a route, touch two points to display a route
- this is natural progression from mouse based hardware to touch screen
mode. There should not be any patent there, it is just a generic change in
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Test polygons from About Invalid, Valid
and Clean Polygons
To: Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net
Cc: Paul Ramsey pram...@cleverelephant.ca, discuss@lists.osgeo.org,
Wilko Quak w.q...@otb.tudelft.nl, Peter van Oosterom
p.j.m.vanooste...@tudelft.nl, Theo Tijssen
t.p.m.tijs
had an ST_IsValid function at the time. Anyway when I am back in the
office
I'll try to find the original scripts.
That would be helpful, thanks!
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss
Markus
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
On 28 October 2013 00:31, Peter van Oosterom - OTB - TBM
p.j.m.vanooste...@tudelft.nl wrote:
Dear all,
Quite sure the results are correct for PostGIS.
The work was done in first half of 2003; see publication
the years shortly after!
Please find attached the test script.
Peter,
Not commenting on PostGIS capabilities at that time, but thank you
very much for the scripts!
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
an ST_IsValid function at the time. Anyway when I am back in the office
I'll try to find the original scripts.
That would be helpful, thanks!
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http
://www.springer.com/cda/content/document/cda_downloaddocument/9783540226109-c1.pdf
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Hi,
On Jan 20th 2014, the coursera starts the course on image processing,
tools and algorithms. I think this may be of someone's interest here as well:
https://www.coursera.org/course/images
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
).
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Participation in this whole process is a form of torture ~~ Szalony
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
On 23 September 2013 22:49, Tamas Szekeres szeker...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/9/23 Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net
Although I suggested CoApp route as I think it's the right modern way
to package FOSS for Windows,
I don't think I will be able to get actively involved in this project I'm
On 21 September 2013 23:35, Tamas Szekeres szeker...@gmail.com wrote:
And so on (anyone is welcomed to add further experiences or ideas)
I think it may be worth to remind about CoApp:
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/osgeo4w-dev/2013-April/002168.html
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot
:)
(_)? (_)? (_)?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Participation in this whole process is a form of torture ~~ Szalony
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
from the server now.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Participation in this whole process is a form of torture ~~ Szalony
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Dimitris congratulations to newly elected board members
and thanks to previous and current members as well.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot
(Sent from mobile, apology for top-posting and broken quotes)
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http
be more considerate?
Best regards
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Participation in this whole process is a form of torture ~~ Szalony
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
to have
encouraged ERSI to try to push GeoServices through.
Indeed.
The whole discussion is more like a cry over spilled milk.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http
freedom from DLL hell as well as Cygwin,
MSys and other such prosthesis.
[1]
http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Garrett-Serack-Open-Source-on-Windows-and-the-CoApp-Project
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss
On 15 March 2013 15:46, Angelos Tzotsos gcpp.kal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
OSGeoLive is missing from the list ;)
https://www.ohloh.net/p/OSGeo-Live/
Done
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Hi,
The Ohloh service launched beta of organizationst:
http://www.ohloh.net/orgs
Most if not all OSGeo projects are present at Ohloh.
Would it be a good idea to add OSGeo there?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss
for help.
Would you mind if I also was listed as an 'admin'
for this?
Sure, I will add you as admin.
I'll be back on that.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org
, e-mail us on planet
(at) osgeo (dot) org
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
of Shell loyalty programme for developers:
1 litre of fuel earns 1 point; get 25 points and you'll get free coffee ;)
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Hi,
I'm forwarding potentially interesting article from FSM:
http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/articles/can_terms_gpl_prevent_gnulinux_being_used_war
with two of OSGeo projects mentioned.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
. There were five seats open and they have been
filled by, in alphabetical order:
* Anne Ghisla
* Jeff McKenna
* Daniel Morissette
* Cameron Shorter
* Frank Warmerdam
Congratulations to the new board members!
Arnulf, big thanks!
Anne, be strong! ;-)
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http
://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists#Nabble
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Hi,
Can someone explain me what is this Seconded by
and Support by feature listed next to the Board nominations [1]?
Is this an element of any formal procedure or it's some kind of elevator pitch?
[1] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Board_Member_Nominations_2012
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot
On 27 July 2012 10:32, Seven (aka Arnulf) se...@arnulf.us wrote:
On 07/27/2012 10:06 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Can someone explain me what is this Seconded by
and Support by feature listed next to the Board nominations [1]?
Is this an element of any formal procedure or it's some kind
components.
GPL is dying, of natural causes.
http://ostatic.com/blog/the-top-licenses-on-github
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
On 27 July 2012 11:47, Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
On 27 July 2012 05:55, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com wrote:
This is a really interesting debate. Reading the links provided it also
appears
On 27 July 2012 15:27, Seven (aka Arnulf) se...@arnulf.us wrote:
On 07/27/2012 11:45 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
On 27 July 2012 05:55, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com wrote:
This is a really interesting debate. Reading the links provided it also
appears to be a mixed bag about acceptance
Ragi,
Thank you very much for sharing your experience.
You've saved me a lot of time
--
Mateusz Loskot
(Sent from phone, apology for any top-posting or broken quoting)
On 27 Jul 2012 21:11, rburhum r...@burhum.com wrote:
As someone who has done several for-pay projects (both big and small
to the next board meeting so that
we don't wake up late for the next elections again...
I am with Arnulf on this: let's stick with what we have and revisit in time
before the next election.
Thoroughly +1
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
,
feel free send the candidate flowers or a box of chocolate, I suppose.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
On 19 Jun 2012 16:17, Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)
bob.basq...@ci.stpaul.mn.us wrote:
OSGEO news feed
the OSGEO side
FYI, it is spelled OSGeo, not OSGEO.
--
Mateusz Loskot
(Sent from phone, apology for any top-posting or broken quoting)
___
Discuss
-cee.org for more details.
[...]
Jachym,
Congratulations and bravo!
It sounds and looks as the conference was a success in 101%!
I regret I couldn't make it this year, but I'm hopeful and looking forward to
attending next edition 2013.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On 2 April 2012 23:13, Simon Greener si...@spatialdbadvisor.com wrote:
No it's not. Please do not post non-OSGEO topics on this discussion list.
Simon
FYI, it is spelled OSGeo, not OSGEO.
[1] http://www.osgeo.org/content/foundation/legal/trademark_guidelines.html
Best regards,
--
Mateusz
1 - 100 of 240 matches
Mail list logo