[OSGeo-Discuss] deegree day 2010: Registration
+++ Sorry for any cross postings +++ +++ Please find a German version below +++ Dear friends of deegree! Registration for deegree day 2010 is online and available on http://deegreeday.deegree.org/ November 16 The Programme Committee has evaluated the paper submissions and has compiled an exciting conference programme. The conference is free of charge. November 17 Two workshops focusing on leading edge technology features of the first deegree 3 release will be offered. Charges apply (150 EUR each). News Feel free to twitter about the event. Tweets using the hashtag #deegreeday will be published on the conference homepage automatically. We are looking forward to welcome you in Bonn on November 16 17, 2010. Judit Mays on behalf of the deegree day team +++ German Version +++ Liebe Freunde des deegree-Projekts, die Anmeldung zum deegree day 2010 ist nun online verfügbar unter http://deegreeday.deegree.org 16. November Das Programmkomitee hat alle eingereichten Paper gesichtet und ein außergewöhnlich spannendes Programm zusammen gestellt. Die Teilnahme an der Konferenz ist kostenlos. 17. November Zwei Workshops werden herausragende technologische Merkmale des ersten deegree 3-Release anhand von praktischen Beispielen vorstellen. Kosten: je 150 EUR. Neuigkeiten Twittern Sie über diese Veranstaltung. Tweets, die den Hashtag #deegreeday verwenden, werden automatisch auf der Konferenz-Homepage veröffentlicht. Wir freuen uns, Sie am 16. und 17. November 2010 in Bonn begrüßen zu können. Judit Mays für das Organisationsteam -- l a t / l o n GmbH Aennchenstrasse 19 53177 Bonn, Germany phone ++49 +228 18496-0 fax ++49 +228 18496-29 http://www.lat-lon.dehttp://www.deegree.org * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * deegree day 2010 http://deegreeday.deegree.org * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Demo WMS server
Hi Jochen, The deegree demo server [1] hosts a WMS as well. It always runs with the latest stable version of deegree. The Base-URL for the deegree WMS [2], an example for the GetCapabilities [3] and, last but not least, an example for serving OSM slippy maps via WMS [4] as direct data source are also available. [1]http://demo.deegree.org [2]http://demo.deegree.org/deegree-wms/services? [3]http://demo.deegree.org/deegree-wms/services?REQUEST=GetCapabilitiesversion=1.1.1service=WMS [4]http://demo.deegree.org/deegree-wms/wms.jsp - Special features of deegree WMS Greetings, Judit Jochen Topf schrieb: I am just working on a piece of Open Source software that can access WMS servers. I'd like to have some kind of demo server that could be configured in the software by default so that people have a working configuration directly after install which makes it easier for them to get going. The server doesn't have to do much, just deliver a simple world map or so. I looked around a bit for suitable demo servers, but didn't find any. It should be something with a reasonable chance that it will be around for a while. I could imagine that other people have the same problem. How about having such a WMS server on a OSGeo host somewhere? I don't expect a huge amount of load on such a server, its just for demo and not for actual use, really. What do you think about this? I don't have access to any OSGeo hosts, but would be willing to help with the setup. Jochen -- l a t / l o n GmbH Aennchenstrasse 19 53177 Bonn, Germany phone ++49 +228 18496-0fax ++49 +228 18496-29 http://www.lat-lon.de http://www.deegree.org Follow deegree on Twitter: http://twitter.com/deegree_org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Demo WMS server
Jochen Topf schrieb: Thanks, I actually looked at the degree demo server and found at least the layers I tested to be empty. :-( Hi Jochen, as we are constantly working on improvements for our services, I would be very interested to hear more about these problems. Maybe we can discuss them on the deegree users list or by private mail? Greetings, Judit -- l a t / l o n GmbH Aennchenstrasse 19 53177 Bonn, Germany phone ++49 +228 18496-0fax ++49 +228 18496-29 http://www.lat-lon.de http://www.deegree.org Follow deegree on Twitter: http://twitter.com/deegree_org ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Generalizing complex 3D vector polygon data
Hello, in deegree3 tools, there is a class org.deegree.tools.rendering.manager.buildings.generalisation.WorldObjectSimplifier, which creates a convex hull of the 2D-Projection (ground level) of the original, and creates 'vertical' walls on this convex hull, it is not a real simplification though. If this might be of interest to you please ask further questions regarding this tool on the deegree-users list: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/deegree-users Kind regards, Judit Alexandre Leroux schrieb: Dear list, Here's my challenge. I have 3D buildings originally in the AutoCAD format which are composed of hundreds of 2D polygons in 3D space. Is there any tool that can generalize 3D data? I found that GRASS GIS offers line generalization: http://grass.itc.it/gdp/html_grass64/v.generalize.html but found nothing regarding 3D generalization. My feeling is that 'GIS technology' is just not there yet. There's just no implemented algorithms to generalize complex 3D to less complex 3D data. Am I right? Since my team is heavily using FOSS4G, we're looking for a solution (if any) that would ideally be 100% FOSS4G. Thanks for any feedback, Alex signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] AOSI's Official Statement about IIPA - help to distributed.
In case anyone wants more info, read Jo's blog. Nice read. http://www.archaeogeek.com/blog/2010/02/24/ahoy-me-hearties-we-all-be-pirates/ Cheers, Judit Frans Thamura schrieb: hi all AOSI (asosiasi opensource indonesia) is our local association of opensource in Indonesia, where is our umbrella for anyone related to services, support, product and entities related to opensource, smiliar with OSFA in USA. and we know that IIPA submit a letter to USTR about Indonesia and several country to create 301, which will effect to our trade and economy. and our goverment work togeter with us, to respect the IPR by adopting OpenSource if the goverment or institution dont have money to buy license, but we know IIPA is a big lobby in USA, where i hear about BSA, Sony, BMG are the member may be u can help to distribute and we are open for work together to promote opensource, and we know that using opensource is legal. this is the URL of the official statement of AOSI about IIPA, where i am stand in enterprise opensource chief http://www.slideshare.net/flatburger/aosi-on-iipa-en hope all of u can distribute to the people that can help us here, that is strange we use opensource to respect IPR, but we still in ilegal movement. aosi website is http://www.aosi.or.id signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4G 2010 Call for Workshops and Tutorials is open
Hi, from this email in January I learned that abstract submission deadline for FOSS4G would be on May 1st, 2010 (see Upcoming milestones). Now I read on the web pages, that the deadline is April 1st. Should this change of deadline not be announced more offensively? People might miss the date otherwise. Or is there no change of plans and the 1st of May still holds true? Cheers, Judit Oscar Fonts schrieb: Barcelona, Spain. 15 January 2010. The Free and Open Source Software for Geospatial (FOSS4G) conference is pleased to announce a Call for Workshops and Tutorials for the 2010 conference, being held September 6-9, 2010, in Barcelona, Spain. FOSS4G is the international gathering of tribes for open source geospatial communities. Users and developers are encouraged to present their latest projects and software to demonstrate the power of Open Source for system integration through a series of workshop sessions and tutorial presentations. Session participants should expect to see presentations on both geospatial open source and propriety software integration along with pure open source solutions. Workshops Workshops are expected to be 3 hour hands-on experiences with participants following along with the instructor, working directly with the application under discussion. All workshop rooms will be equipped with computers to support this vision. A projector will be provided for each computer room for use within a workshop. Instructors will need to discuss pre-installation requirements with the Conference Organising Committee if required. Workshops are expected to require considerable effort to create, with past experience showing that three days of preparation per hour of presentation are required to produce a high quality workshop. Additionally you will be expected to develop material for attendees to take home with them, such as handouts, workbook, CD-ROMs, etc. Due to the effort involved in producing and presenting a workshop, instructors will receive a single complementary registration to the conference for delivering a workshop. All workshop submissions will be considered, but particular interest will be shown in: * Practical Introduction to FOSS4G software * Integrating Open Source * Spatial Data Infrastructure Tutorials Tutorials are 90 minute sessions during the regular presentations portion of the conference. Tutorial rooms will not be equipped with computers. However, presenters may make use of delegate laptops and the FOSS4G LiveDVD. Preference will be given to hands-on tutorials. Any hands-on aspects to a tutorial will be the responsibility of the presenter and needs to be described in the tutorial description. Presenters making use of the LiveDVD will be expected to contribute to testing pre-releases to ensure material and software is properly installed. To discuss your requirements for LiveDVD, please contact the LiveDVD community: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc#Contact_Us. All tutorial submissions will be considered, but particular interest will be shown in the following topics: * Practical Introductions * Interoperability * Integration * Performance tuning * SDI services * Mobile/phone applications Application form --- Follow this link to submit your proposals: http://intranet.pacifico-meetings.com:8081/abscoweb/Inicio.iface?id=14 Please add a 300 word abstract, in plain text format (pasting a text with style markup could make the process fail). The deadline for workshop / tutorial submissions is January 30. FOSS4G 2010 Highlights Workshops and Tutorials: Workshops and Tutorials allow presenters to lead attendees through applications, integration solutions, or other topics in an interactive environment. Half-day workshops (3 hours) will be held in computer rooms on September 6 (afternoon session) and 7 (morning session). Tutorials (90 minutes) will be held in standard presentation rooms, run concurrently with presentations on 7-9 September. Presentations: The meat of the conference are it's presentations. Drawing on a huge community of local, regional and international experts we will discuss some of the most current and poignant topics in the industry today. Academic Track: The academic sessions, with paper publications and poster presentations, aims at bringing together researchers, developers, users and practitioners carrying out research and development in the geospatial and the free and open source fields and willing to share original and recent research developments and experiences. The academic track will act as an inventory of current research topics, with the main objective of promoting cooperative research between OSGeo developers and the academia. FOSS4G Live DVD: LiveDVDs, based on the Xubuntu operating system and including Geospatial Open
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] deegree vs GeoTools API
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ian Turton schrieb: On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Frans Thamura fr...@meruvian.org wrote: hi all anyone can share the difference between Deegree vs GeoTools API Deegree is a WMS/WFS/WCS(?) server and GeoTools is a Java library for building geospatial apps. Ian Hi, in my view this differentiation does not quite fit. It is true that deegree offers a long list of services (implementing various specifications of the OGC). But deegree is also a Java library that can be used through its API. Currently, deegree is undergoing a thorough rewrite of the code base. While the current stable version (deegree2) offers many different pre-packaged web services, it is a bit weak when it comes to strict separation of API and application. Amongst other things, this is being addressed in the development of the next major version (deegree3). BTW, deegree implements more OGC services than just WMS, WFS and WCS. For a full list of implemented web services, you could check our wiki: deegree2: http://wiki.deegree.org/deegreeWiki/deegree2 deegree3: http://wiki.deegree.org/deegreeWiki/deegree3 kind regards, Judit -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkt1LUAACgkQ00HMccodrqUmRwCgkyvWD2TwM9MQmtS3YhhKOsIJ 8iQAnjD56z5/U9IElLiuY7OMRrxydNi0 =ccR3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] deegree vs GeoTools API
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Frans, you are always welcome to ask any deegree specific questions on one of our mailing lists. There is one for users[1] and one for developers[2]. We would be very interested to hear about your plans. [1] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/deegree-users [2] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/deegree-devel Kind regards, Judit Mays Frans Thamura schrieb: i still have a gap in my mind about how to make a program for both :0 i will play around with both first, and will reply shortly F On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Stefan Steiniger sst...@geo.uzh.ch wrote: Hei Frans, could you outline in more detail what you are aiming to do? I.e. what the students (after training) and the software (to be programmed) should be able to do? If it is about web mapping then you may consider a whole different range of FOSS4GIS. stefan Frans Thamura wrote: thx for the nice reply . i have work with our goverment spatial division, teaching java, and they are 100% blank in development, this is a transformation program from a division to create map become a services entity - www.bakosutranal.go.id i am also teaching highschool develop apps on Java, and we success create web java programmer in architectural mode, and they will get schoolarship to university, mostly they are poor and smart, and several dont have computer, and several never visit Jakarta (they families never visit Jakarta).. my idea to help them to the level that they can provide solution. Landon, ur reply sound that using Geotools API will harder for them? is that right? i am still working for both to find the best one hope my reply can link our problem. we have human resource and bad education program in this country, so may be our student different with people outside this country F On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Landon Blake lbl...@ksninc.com wrote: Frans, I will try to provide an intelligent answer to your question based on my own experience. Here is my observation of the main difference between Deegree and Geotools: Degree seems to be a more closely knit group of developers, coming from just a couple of organizations, while Geotools draws developers from all over the place. This has some different implications for users of the libraries and for developers. I find the Deegree API is often easier to use but not as well documented. The Geotools API is better documented but much more complicated. I think this extra complication in Geotools stems from its efforts to please such a diverse group. I have contributed a single unsupported module to Geotools. This process wasn't too burdensome, and I found a couple of the programmers in Geotools were a delight to work with. I also learned a lot from my very limited work on Geotools. I typically work on code that plugs into a single program, and participation in Geotools requires you to write code that can be used in all sorts of programs. You need a different type of thinking to do that. The programmers from Deegree were also very responsive on their mailing list. Deegree uses a feature model somewhat similar to JUMP's. I find the Geotools feature model is very hard to learn and work with. I hope that helps. Landon Office Phone Number: (209) 946-0268 Cell Phone Number: (209) 992-0658 -Original Message- From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Frans Thamura Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 1:30 AM To: OSGeo Discussions Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] Degree vs GeoTools API hi all anyone can share the difference between Deegree vs GeoTools API thx -- Frans Thamura Meruvian. Experiential Tempation of Java and Enterprise OpenSource Meruvian jTechnopreneur Program (S1) telah hadir, Dapatkan benefit bagi SMK yang melakukan mapping SKKD, dg program beasiswa dari Gunadarma Mobile: +6287885901958 Blog Profile: http://frans.thamura.info We provide services to migrate your apps to Java (web), in amazing fast and reliable. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkt1LywACgkQ00HMccodrqVVdgCgi4PQo/JlzGMrcXAtYGhj5dfy oFAAoKM7VQUk6PN6Whuq7fbMP2StjORi =Rhh+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [deegree-devel] Fwd: [OSGeo-Discuss] WCS/WMS accuracy tests?
Dear Steven, thank you very much for the good work you put into the WCS testing. I have already talked to some of the other deegree developers, but as they are all extremely busy at the moment, they did not find the time yet to follow up on your test scenario and see what the reasons are for the deegree2.3-rc1 WCS behaviour. I am not sure yet that it should be called a bug, but if it is, we will see to get it fixed eventually. I will make sure to let you know about the outcome. Info for the deegree-devel list readers: The full thread on OSGeo-discuss may be found here: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2009-December/006442.html Steve's test scenario outcome is posted in this blog: http://blog.minst.net/2009/12/09/perceived-wcs-inaccuracy Kind regards, Judit Steven M. Ottens schrieb: as requested by Judit Mays A slight update since this mail was sent to the OSGeo list: According to the Geoserver people their behavior is correct and Mapserver and QGIS might be wrong, see http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3702 This leaves the difference between deegree-wcs and both Geoserver and Mapserver to your discretion. Regards, Steven Begin forwarded message: From: Steven M. Ottens ste...@minst.net Date: December 9, 2009 2:03:31 PM GMT+01:00 To: OSGeo Discussions discuss@lists.osgeo.org Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] WCS/WMS accuracy tests? Reply-To: OSGeo Discussions discuss@lists.osgeo.org Hi all, I've finished my tests. The conclusion: Geoserver has a bug which offsets all the results by half a pixel, this is a known issue with the definition of the location of a pixel. Added to this there’s the no-data border which appears with non-native, non-multiple requests. I presume that will be gone once the pixel issue is resolved. Mapserver doesn’t offset the data unless it is physically impossible (non-native, non-multiple resolutions, extents which don’t snap to source data) but produces a multi-band geotiff where the source data is single band. Deegree has a bug which offsets some of the results, but I don’t know what causes it and although it is resolution-related I don’t see a pattern. It also produces a multi-band geotiff instead of a single band. The full report can be found at: http://blog.minst.net/2009/12/09/perceived-wcs-inaccuracy (slow site warning) The issue for Geoserver can be found at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3702 The issue for Deegree can be found at http://wald.intevation.org/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1216group_id=27atid=212 For mapserver I didn't file a bug since I'm not entirely sure if the GeoTiff multi-band image is me or mapserver and I didn't inverstigate it any further. If there are any questions or remarks let me know regards, Steven On Dec 8, 2009, at 9:31 AM, Judit Mays wrote: Hello Steven, the deegree crowd would also be interested in a description of your test cases and the results. If you could send an email either here or, preferably, to the deegree developer list [1], this would be much appreciated. I talked to one of the main deegree WMS developers and he told me that deegree-wms passes all the OGC CITE tests of CITE 1.3.0, and that there are specific tests which check whether the returned tiff contains the expected pixels. So it would indeed be interesting to see, what is different in your tests to cause the offset. Kind regards, Judit [1] deegree-de...@lists.sourceforge.net | register at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/deegree-devel Steven M. Ottens schrieb: On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:04 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote: Steven M. Ottens wrote: On Dec 7, 2009, at 6:48 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote: Steven M. Ottens wrote: Hi all, Working with Geoserver as a WCS we discovered that requesting a GeoTIFF in the same projection as the original GeoTIFF produces a shifted dataset. (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3702) The shift is small, less than one pixel of the original dataset, but with a coarse dataset of 100m/pixel it can be 70meters. The Geoserver people are aware of the problem and at some point in time will fix it I'm sure, but it prompted me to test other OSS WCS servers (mapserver and deegree). Both of them showed a shift of the data as well. Deegree has about the same error as Geoserver, while Mapserver does a better job but is still off. I know there have been speed tests between different WMS services, but I'm wondering has there been any data-quality/accuracy test been done between WMS and/or WCS services? Steven, I would appreciate your filing a detailed ticket on this issue against MapServer. Please be specific about the exact request made, provide the data and mapfile, and explain why you think the results are wrong. Will do once the tests are completed. Currently we overlay the original GeoTiff with the result of the request in QGIS. Other ways of testing are welcome. (I was thinking gdal-info output, overlay
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] WCS/WMS accuracy tests?
Hello Steven, the deegree crowd would also be interested in a description of your test cases and the results. If you could send an email either here or, preferably, to the deegree developer list [1], this would be much appreciated. I talked to one of the main deegree WMS developers and he told me that deegree-wms passes all the OGC CITE tests of CITE 1.3.0, and that there are specific tests which check whether the returned tiff contains the expected pixels. So it would indeed be interesting to see, what is different in your tests to cause the offset. Kind regards, Judit [1] deegree-de...@lists.sourceforge.net | register at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/deegree-devel Steven M. Ottens schrieb: On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:04 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote: Steven M. Ottens wrote: On Dec 7, 2009, at 6:48 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote: Steven M. Ottens wrote: Hi all, Working with Geoserver as a WCS we discovered that requesting a GeoTIFF in the same projection as the original GeoTIFF produces a shifted dataset. (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3702) The shift is small, less than one pixel of the original dataset, but with a coarse dataset of 100m/pixel it can be 70meters. The Geoserver people are aware of the problem and at some point in time will fix it I'm sure, but it prompted me to test other OSS WCS servers (mapserver and deegree). Both of them showed a shift of the data as well. Deegree has about the same error as Geoserver, while Mapserver does a better job but is still off. I know there have been speed tests between different WMS services, but I'm wondering has there been any data-quality/accuracy test been done between WMS and/or WCS services? Steven, I would appreciate your filing a detailed ticket on this issue against MapServer. Please be specific about the exact request made, provide the data and mapfile, and explain why you think the results are wrong. Will do once the tests are completed. Currently we overlay the original GeoTiff with the result of the request in QGIS. Other ways of testing are welcome. (I was thinking gdal-info output, overlay in uDig and ArcMap to rule out bias of QGIS) Steve, Are you requesting the data at greater than the natural resolution of the image? Is it the DescribeCoverage extent details that are wrong? If you request the imagery supersampled (at higher resolution than the underlying image) then there is a known issue with MapServer that can be fixed by setting adding the following line to the LAYER at some cost in processing speed: I will test both the same resolution and a greater resolution to be sure. Currently we request a greater resolution since that's what we need. PROCESSING RESAMPLE=NEAREST I discovered that already and included it in my mapfile. The trouble is that the image from Mapserver (and the other services) is shifted to the South East. I only did a quick test before the office closed so the exact shift is still to be determined, but it was noticeable smaller than with Geoserver and Deegree. For Geoserver we tested it both by defining a resolution of the output image and with a width and height with the same BBOX. For Mapserver I only tried the resolution request (resx=#resy=#) If that is the issue then a ticket might still be appropriate, but I will take a different approach which is to force use of the more precise resampler when any raster draw request is made at supersampled resolution. Best regards, -- ---+-- I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmer...@pobox.com light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam and watch the world go round - Rush| Geospatial Programmer for Rent -- Judit Mays l a t / l o n GmbH Aennchenstrasse 19 53177 Bonn, Germany phone ++49 +228 18496-0 fax ++49 +228 18496-29 http://www.lat-lon.dehttp://www.deegree.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[OSGeo-Discuss] Re: [Incubator] Request for OSGeo projects logos
Hi, links for the deegree logos (png and svg) have been added to http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Logos_from_OSGeo_projects kind regards, Judit Mays Arnulf Christl schrieb: OSGeo Project Leads (incubating and graduated), please make sure that you upload your logos in high quality SVG format to the OSGeo Marketing SVN repository, please create a sub folder with the name of your project: http://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/marketing/logo/projects/ The logos will be used by the Marketing Committee, Local Chapters and individuals giving presentations, talks, etc. Pushing your logo there in high quality will add emphasis to your professionalism and help to promote and add visibility to your efforts. If you do not have an acceptable SVG file please upload a high resolution raster image, that will still be better than not having anything. Best regards, Arnulf. Jorge Gaspar Sanz Salinas wrote: Lars Lingner escribió: Micho Gar schrieb: Hi all, the OSGeo spanish chapter are working on making a poster to the 5th gvSIG conference. We need the logos of the OSGeo projects, but in vectorial format, like .svg. Do you know where we can find??. There is an subversion repository: http://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/marketing/ Maybe that has some sources you could use. This is the place where we *should* have project logos, but at this time there are just sponsors and general OSGeo branding stuff. Maybe the logos are there, out of the logo folder... What about asking any project to place there the best/last logo they have? Cheers signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] The Best API for accessing map/geospatial server
Hello Frans, as Jody mentioned, there is deegree as well [1]. deegree WMS is fully certified by OGC, and it is the reference implementation for WMS 1.1.1 and WMS 1.3.0 [2]. Currently, deegree is in OSGeo incubation, and we are looking forward to solve the pending issues within the next few weeks. Kind regards, Judit Mays [1] http://deegree.org [2] http://cite.opengeospatial.org/reference Frans Thamura schrieb: i just got Java Geotools as an Java API to access the geospatial server based on WMS (OGC) Correct. You will find the GeoTools DataStore api lets you treat it like a database; and indeed lets you handle Shapefile / Web Feature Server and Databases in a similar fashion (with transactions and queries etc...). thx for the reply jody with this positoning, i feel that because no other than Java Geotools :) i want to reverse, which one of those map servers in the world have fully certified by OGC for WMS implementation, so we know, all our apps that connect to those geospatial server no need modification i can change mapguide to mapserver to geoserver and vice versa any idea all? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] The Best API for accessing map/geospatial server
Hello Frans, even though it is an uncommon way to spell it, the software really is called deegree, with two double-ee. Some more details from the OSGeo SVN: https://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/marketing/flyer/project_brochure_pdfs/OSGeo_Brochures_deegree.pdf Hope you will enjoy the software! Kind regards, Judit Frans Thamura schrieb: awesome now the geospatial s/w moving to ceritication also :0 i am looking about degree, i think it is degree from certification, hehe Frans signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[OSGeo-Discuss] OpenStreetMap im Rheinland and deegree day on May 26th/27th 2009
Dear OSGeo community, in two weeks time the 4th deegree day will take place in Bonn, Germany. For the first time, this years deegree day will be co-hosting a regional OpenStreetMap conference. Detailed information on the two-day-programme can be found at http://deegreeday.deegree.org/deegreeday2009/programme Please note: The consultation hours of our deegree doctor are also listed there. The deegree doctor will answer your questions and help out with problems concerning deegree. Conference participation (deegree day OpenStreetMap event) is free of charge, but for organisational reasons we request your registration until May 19th 2009 at http://deegreeday.deegree.org/deegreeday2009/registration There are still some places available in our tutorials and workshops. Please check their detailed descriptions at http://deegreeday.deegree.org/deegreeday2009/workshops Please note: the free tutorial introduction to deegree is offered in German (on May 26th) and English (on May 27th). We are looking forward to meeting you in Bonn! Join us! Kind regards, Judit Mays -- l a t / l o n GmbH Aennchenstrasse 19 53177 Bonn, Germany phone ++49 +228 18496-0 fax ++49 +228 18496-29 http://www.lat-lon.dehttp://www.deegree.org --- OpenStreetMap im Rheinland - May 26th deegree day 2009 - May 27th http://deegreeday.deegree.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Geodata Licensing Working_Group wiki page is German LC Wiki page ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Yves I have no idea why this is the case, but for some reason or other the Geodata_Licensing_Working_Group gets redirected to the German local chapter page (D-A-CH) http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php?title=Geodata_Licensing_Working_Groupredirect=no on a very quick scroll through that page I couldn't identify anything connected to Licensing. Greetings, Judit Jacolin Yves schrieb: Hi, I don't understand this page, even with the help of Google Translator [1]. The link in [2] tells me that this page is A Geodata Licensing Working Group to look into parallel licensing developments and to consult on guidelines for open licenses for geodata. in Working group section. Its title tells me this is a right page, but all is wrote in german and google translator show me a German Local chapter wiki page. Does the content of this wiki page move so much that its title need to be changed? Do you know where is the new wiki content of this working group? Thanks, Y. [1] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Geodata_Licensing_Working_Group [2] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Public_Geospatial_Data_Project -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknUcfYACgkQ00HMccodrqVwagCeP69y9GHJc9uHALWuOGvWZPY6 CToAniwMY8vKJxLzEfdCzYrDwnQokvv0 =yqpf -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] web services in agriculture
Jachym Cepicky schrieb: Hi, I'm looking after some articles, concerning usage of web services in agriculture or forestry. I would appreciate any links or pdfs or just a hint, where is the best place to start searching. Thanks Jachym Edward Nash from University of Rostock, Germany, has been involved in a project called preagro. May be you find some hints starting there. http://www.preagro.de/Veroeff/Geocomputing%20Made%20Simple.pdf regards, Judit -- l a t / l o n GmbH Aennchenstrasse 19 53177 Bonn, Germany phone ++49 +228 18496-0 fax ++49 +228 18496-29 http://www.lat-lon.dehttp://www.deegree.org ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Projects at FOSS4G
Hi OSGeo-discussion-list, this is my first mail to you all. So far I have only been reading, with great interest. Hello Tyler, I will be representing the deegree project (currently in incubation), with two talks and one lab. Kind regards, Judit Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo) schrieb: I'm curious about how many different projects (OSGeo and others) will be represented at FOSS4G by speakers, workshops, etc. Rather than wade through the presentation listing, I thought I'd be lazy and ask here. If you know that your project(s) are going to be represented there, could you drop me a note? Just let me know in general how many folks from it will be there. If there are enough people around we could arrange times for people to meet your project at the OSGeo booth. It would also help to know if your project has plans to bring flyers or brochures to hand out at the booth. The OSGeo Marketing Committee is arranging to have some overview brochures. Also, all projects and committees are welcome to do a brief talk at the Annual General Meeting.[1] It had great turnout last year and was very informative! Just sign up if you want to talk or add an item to the list for debate/discussion during the meeting. Tyler [1] AGM: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Annual_General_Meeting_2008 ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
