Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Open Source Geospatial Atlas

2013-03-18 Thread Robert Szczepanek

Hi Barry and others,

Is Open Source Geospatial Atlas idea still alive?
I hope so.
Just to remind this good idea ...

best regards,
Robert

On 05.08.2012 19:05, Barry Rowlingson wrote:

For all those interested in the atlas project, I've started up a github site:

https://github.com/barryrowlingson/osgeoatlas

The .tex file there isn't compilable as it stands because the included
map.pdf files aren't included, they are kinda large and I didn't want
to clog the repo up with them. Maybe I could. Anyway.

In the downloads is a compiled pdf - it uses the latex-tufte style and
looks quite lovely. If only the maps were, I just did a couple of
quick print composers in Qgis as proof-of-concept. They won't make the
final cut.

Please add comments and ideas as issues on the github tracker.

Barry
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss



___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] CORRECTION -- Re: Board Elections 2012

2012-08-03 Thread Robert Szczepanek
I don't know Cameron personally, but as I understand our goal is to 
select the best representative from nominated persons.
People make mistakes and election rules should give us just guideline. 
And those tiny mistakes could be easily corrected.


So Cameron definitely should be on the list!

best regards,
Robert Szczepanek

On 03.08.2012 14:42, Venkatesh Raghavan wrote:

On 2012/08/03 21:25, Michael P. Gerlek wrote:

Cameron Shorter's name was inadvertently omitted from the nomination
page.

Such omissions cannot be reported now after the election process have
started.
On one had the board says that election rules cannot be changed after the
election process has started and on the other hand request acceptance
of some "inadvertent omissions".

I strongly feel that we go ahead with the election with the candidates
listed in
the present nominee list.

I will be happy if Cameron Shorter's nomination is brought up in the
next board
election.

Venka



Arnulf and I are both(!) traveling today and can't quickly update the
wiki - if some kind soul would do that for us, we would appreciate it.

If you have already voted and wish to change your selections, feel
free to do so.

Thank you for your understanding  and cooperation!

.mpg&  Arnulf, CRO's




On Aug 3, 2012, at 4:27 AM, Arnulf Christl  wrote:


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dear Charter Members,
we are approaching the end of the 2012 elections [0]. The Board
nomination period has ended and all nominees listed on [1] have
confirmed that they are happy to stand for election.

Please take your time to read through the nomination, the acceptance
and thoughts from each candidate and then proceed to vote for 5
different candidates by adding them one per line to an email to be
sent to c...@osgeo.org.

Voting closes at 23:59 (your timezone) 12-August-2012!

Please caefully follow the instructions given on the Wiki [2] in order
to be able to submit a valid email and MAKE SURE TO SEND IT TO
c...@osgeo.org ONLY. Otherwise your vote may become public or just
disappear somewhere. You will receive a confirmation of your
successful vote. If you do not receive a confirmation within 24h of
submitting your mail please contact c...@osgeo.org

Thank your for taking on this responsibility,
Your CROs
(Arnulf Christl&  Michael Gerlek)

[0] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Election_2012
[1] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Board_Member_Nominations_2012
[2]
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Election_2012#Vote_for_new_Board_Members_-_2012-08-03_-_2012-08-12


- -- President, OSGeo
http://www.osgeo.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlAbtaAACgkQXmFKW+BJ1b38RwCeOFOp4mQGCXVQEAkd7pyvnRZE
g5wAnjWfXfi9aImTjdIL4UZ3YKwIxVh4
=UCHq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss




___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss



___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Training and certification

2011-06-10 Thread Robert Szczepanek

W dniu 10.06.2011 08:44, Tyler Mitchell pisze:

On 2011-06-09, at 11:07 PM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:

Anyone else thinking about this or want to weigh-in on what their thoughts were?


If this competes with the activities the professionals and enterprises are 
currently
offering, -1. We want OSGeo to support our work, not to compete with it. This 
would
have a number of negative consequences, IMHO.


It could actually turn out to encourage or provide work to others currently offering training.  The goal 
could be to develop an OSGeo-specialised curriculum, have certified trainers provide certified training to 
paying customers - in exchange trainers show they are qualified and students can say they are no only 
"QGIS" or "Faunalia" trained.. but "OSGeo trained" - something that no one can 
really do right now anyway :)

Does that help?  Think of the bigger program and not so much on a particular 
course that might be taught currently.


Shouldn't this be done in parallel?
OSGeo activities in the area of GIS "in general" and in the same time 
OSGeo projects covering software application topics with general issues 
as background.
Project activities as driving forces and OSGeo (training, certification 
or whatever) more like common consensus forum in the wide area of 
FOSS4G. In my opinion this consesnus at OSGeo level will be hard to 
reach, as there is big diversity of goals and approaches even within one 
project. Not impossible, but it will take time.


regards,
Robert Szczepanek
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Open "StreamMap"?

2011-05-28 Thread Robert Szczepanek

Hi Charlie,

I like your idea, but there are many issues to discuss.

1. What is the goal?
Depending on users interest (hydrologists, biologists, ..), "average" 
stream can be represented as line or polygon.
Set of attributes depends on user needs. Even simple water level changes 
in time. Without some standarisation (mean yearly level?) this will be 
mixture of everything. And such attributes are not easy to get.


Geometry based on recent ortophotomaps with basic set of attributes 
(stream name(s); some "average" discharge and velocity?) could be start 
point.


2. Relation to OSM.
It can be seen as subset or extension of OSM. And probably those two 
sets will be used together. Close cooperation with/within OSM?


3. Additional data
What about water level gauge stations?

Anyway - great idea!

regards,
Robert

W dniu 28.05.2011 03:51, Charlie Schweik pisze:

Hi,

I find myself wondering if there is a possibility of starting an "open
stream map" project in a similar way to open street map? With the idea
that this might be connected to an invasive plant species effort too...

It is an interesting idea -- roads are relatively stable. Streams have
additional attributes, like water levels.

Any reactions or ideas on how this might be started?

Cheers
Charlie Schweik



___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Open Source OGC Sensor Web Enablement implementations [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-07-23 Thread Robert Szczepanek

Hi Maxi,

Your project looks very interesting and I will contact you soon.
The only strange thing are dates in licence.
2009-20011
Really loong term licence ;)

regards,
Robert

Massimiliano Cannata pisze:

We are working on istSOS (python impolementation of SOS):
http://istgeo.ist.supsi.ch/software/istsos/

Regards,
maxi


On 07/23/2010 04:30 PM, Kralidis,Tom [Ontario] wrote:
  

-Original Message-
From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Bannerman
Sent: Friday, 23 July 2010 01:09
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] Open Source OGC Sensor Web
Enablement implementations [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

I'm trying to get an understanding of which FOSS4G projects
are currently (or are planning to) support OGC Observations
and Measurements as well as other OGC Sensor Web Enablement
related standards.

We see this as a strategic direction that we'll need to explore.

Can you please reply to the list with urls to your documentation?

 

MapServer (SOS 1.0.0 server):
http://www.mapserver.org/ogc/sos_server.html

OWSLib (SOS 1.0.0 client - not mature):
http://trac.gispython.org/lab/browser/OWSLib/trunk/owslib/sos.py

52north implementations: http://52north.org/SensorWeb/

OpenLayers client: http://openlayers.org/dev/examples/sos.html

..Tom
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

   





___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] proposal of new mailing list - graphics

2009-10-11 Thread Robert Szczepanek
Dear friends,

I have a pleasure to inform you that [Graphics] mailing list is working.
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/graphics
You are welcome to discussion...

best regards,
Robert
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


[OSGeo-Discuss] Re: [Qgis-user] GDAL Tools icons

2009-10-01 Thread Robert Szczepanek
Paolo Cavallini pisze:
> Hi Robert.
> We added your icons - thanks!
Thanks Paolo.
In 16x16px size they do not look as in original versions, but we will
work on that later.

> A few are still missing:
> - proximity
> - near black
> - warp
> - grid
> - clip
> All the best.

This task is for next week :)
Can you help me finding self-explaining names for those icons and use
them later in naming convention:
object
action
object-action (probably most will follow this type as they are related
to raster images)

It does not have to be in 100% name of GDAL function. Just description
of what the function does. To reuse it in another context. ... hard to
explain, but I hope you get what I mean.

Robert
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] proposal of new mailing list - graphics

2009-09-30 Thread Robert Szczepanek
Hi Chris,

Your initiative is great and we should definitely combine our efforts.

Cytowanie Chris Holmes :
> Note also that a bit ago we started 'geosilk', see
>
> http://projects.opengeo.org/geosilk
> http://blog.opengeo.org/2009/05/01/geosilk/
>
> These extend the 'silk' icon set which is widely used on the web,
> borrowing geospatial icons from the uDig icons:
>
> http://udig.refractions.net/confluence/display/DEV/Imagery

When I have started this project almost two years ago, silk icons were also
considered as base. But their size was not what we needed for GRASS.
>From my point of view, the most important issue are consistent methaphors, with
potential of scalability. If we can elaborate common set, the rest will be
easy.
Important issue are also (new) standards, like WMS, WFS, etc. I was looking for
their symbols without success, so started to propose mine vision. But it should
be done after discussion.

> We're using them in the GeoServer admin console and in GeoExt, and are
> definitely excited for more people to make use of them and for
> collaboration.  It'd be great to sync up somehow with the gis icons,
> though it looks like ours are a bit more space constrained.

So your goal are 16x16px and mine 24x24px (&22x22px). What graphic software do
you use?

Robert

> Chris
> --
> Chris Holmes
> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
> Expert service straight from the developers.
> ___
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss




___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


[OSGeo-Discuss] proposal of new mailing list - graphics

2009-09-29 Thread Robert Szczepanek
Hi,

My request for new mailing list 'graphics' is related to ongoing process
of visual integration of few projects within OSGeo.
At the moment GRASS and QGIS are involved, but gvSIG is also interested
in cooperation. Present stage of icons development is at:
http://robert.szczepanek.pl/gis-icons-0.1/

I found also that Symbol Registry is under development.
But there is still missing one common place for discussion about
graphics (symbols, icons, etc.).

best regards,
Robert Szczepanek
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


[OSGeo-Discuss] Re: [Qgis-user] GDAL Tools icons

2009-09-25 Thread Robert Szczepanek
Paolo Cavallini pisze:
> Yes, standard icons. See fTools for examples; it would be good to keep the 
> same style; see also
> GRASS toolbox, as several commands have the same results.

First of all I had to make some order in icons and put them together on
one page
http://robert.szczepanek.pl/gis-icons-0.1/#request
At the same time I have started drawing icons for your plugin. I will
update them there.

This is probably good moment to start ordering names and symbols in
stead of making new and new icons. Most of them can be repeated in
different modules, so good (universal) names will help a lot.
And it will help reuse them in other projects.

What is needed now from my point of view:
- to collect icon request from different plugin-authors and different
OSGeo projects,
- to discuss the best names,
- and to decide if presented graphical representation is appropriate.

I was thinking about one common OSGeo mailing list concentrated on
grahics - icons and map symbol set (Markus project). What is your opinion?

Sorry for cross-posting this message.
Robert
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: [Qgis-developer] Icons symbology and naming

2008-12-22 Thread Robert Szczepanek
> We are aiming at icons for applications, not at map symbols (correct
> me if I'm wrong robert) so while there is a big need for mapsymbols,
> I'm not going to address them just yet. Creating a thorough set of
> icons for all foss4g application to use is enough work for the moment.
> [...]
> Steven

You are right Steven. First let's make GIS applications more user friendly by
making toolbar icons better recognizable.
Mapsymbols can be next step when we finish this task ... in 2011 ;)

Robert
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: [Qgis-developer] Icons symbology and naming

2008-12-22 Thread Robert Szczepanek
Hi Bob,

> Is there a set of icons already available to start from?
>
> bobb

My unordered way in chronological order:
- assumptions and first draft http://www.szczepanek.pl/icons.grass/
- second draft http://www.szczepanek.pl/icons.grass/v.0.1/
- short research
http://geoinformatics.fsv.cvut.cz/wiki/index.php/Toolbar_icons_for_GIS_applications
- last versions http://robert.szczepanek.pl/icons.php

Last site contains 3 zipped icon sets used in QGIS and proposal for naming
convention plus basic GIS objects and actions (at the top).

regards,
Robert Szczepanek
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss