Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: Will there be an OSGeo Desktop shootout atFOSS4G 2010?

2009-12-20 Thread samper . d
Also keep in mind, unlike windows specific applications many foss4g apps rely 
on shared libraries like OGR and back end DB's.

So the testing is not just of the application but also the libs and DB's.

A feature comparison is a good start and many masters projects have already 
done that as well as xcompare them to closed source desktop apps.

Cheers
--Original Message--
From: Paolo Cavallini
Sender: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
To: OSGeo Discussions
ReplyTo: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: Will there be an OSGeo Desktop shootout 
atFOSS4G 2010?
Sent: Dec 20, 2009 5:15 AM


On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:59:32 +1100, Cameron Shorter
cameron.shor...@gmail.com wrote:
 Andrea,
 That looks like an excellent basis to start from.
 
 Were the results of the desktop comparison written up somewhere?
 
 While a feature comparison is valuable, the end user is also interested 
 is other metrics which are harder to collect.

Hi Cameron.
Unfortunately we could not collect hard data about this, and frankly I
think this would be very difficult to do - a desktop is much more
subjective than a server. What is difficult for me can be easy for you,
etc.
Anyway, I think such a comparison is really necessary.
Ideas welcome.
All the best.
-- 
http://faunalia.it/pc
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparision between MapServer/OpenLayers andESRI ArcIMS

2009-05-30 Thread samper . d
Fantastic over view of governments using open source for a global perspective 
in the may issue of the open source business resource

But even other people using it won't convince the laggards.

Open source GIS is often implemented from the inside out and not top down.

Eventualy some can point out that ESRI ships open source libraries and tools. 
Then you ask the decision makers why you can't use other open source software 
if ESRI ships it already.

Mp is the classic example (metadata parser).

Just keep providing examples. We could go on for ever in this thread.

Cheers
Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network

-Original Message-
From: Cameron Shorter cameron.shor...@gmail.com

Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 09:52:06 
To: OSGeo Discussionsdiscuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparision between MapServer/OpenLayers and
ESRI ArcIMS


John,
Your information here is fantastic, and I'd love to see it worked into a 
case study. This is the sort of information that Government departments 
ask for all the time.

This Open Source stuff sounds great, but who else has used it? Are 
there any case studies that we can look over?

If you created a good case study talking about how you helped a high 
profile client move from ESRI Arc GIS server to Open Source, it would 
likely become one of the most widely referenced documents in OSGeo 
marketing.

If you do write a case study, make sure it is linked from this web page:
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Case_Studies

We are also looking to see a presentation or two like this at the FOSS4G 
conference this year. This could potentially be done by a couple of 
people talking about more than one case. (Presentations are due in one 
week, on 8 June.) http://2009.foss4g.org


John Callahan wrote:
 To follow up re: status of ArcIMS

 I just checked the ESRI site, clicked on Products, Server GIS and 
 ArcIMS is nowhere to be found.  As well, if you select Training and 
 search for courses, you will find exactly zero instructor-led 
 courses for ArcIMS.   (ArcIMS is also listed under Other Products in 
 the Training section.)So, as far as I'm concerned, ArcIMS is dead 
 and everything goes through ArcGIS Server with ESRI.

 - John



 Bill Thoen wrote:
 Thanks for the help folks, especially to John Callahan. That was the 
 best description of the problem with the ESRI solution that I've seen 
 to date.  What they offer may be good or not --I don't have the 
 experience to argue that point-- but they are even more expensive 
 that I had imagined. I'm very impressed with ESRI's marketing -- if 
 they can sell this, they could sell snow to Santa Claus!

 Regards,
 - Bill Thoen

 ___
 Discuss mailing list
 Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


-- 
Cameron Shorter
Geospatial Systems Architect
Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050
Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254

Think Globally, Fix Locally
Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source
http://www.lisasoft.com

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: Comparision between MapServer/OpenLayers andESRI ArcIMS

2009-05-28 Thread samper . d
Hey julia,

Have you considered whether surplused hardware from within your organization 
could be used for some of this?

It may not suffice for a windows server, and i did not see if you already have 
linux boxes.

Linux is a great platform for GIS for both desktops and servers. This might be 
a too big of a jump right now but in the future might be a viable option.

Cheers
Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network

-Original Message-
From: Julia Harrell juliaharr...@mindspring.com

Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 11:06:48 
To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: Comparision between MapServer/OpenLayers and
ESRIArcIMS



Hi Bill

In addition to the excellent advice others have already given you, be sure to 
consider the extra hardware infrastructure that will be necessary to support 
this much 3D data, on-the-fly geoprocessing, and large numbers of concurrent 
users. If your client chooses an ESRI solution, it will take a lot more than 
they probably counted on purchasing to get a system that will perform 
adequately. ArcGIS Server is a real resource hog. Check out Dave Peter's new 
Building a GIS book. Not that I am a fan of the AGS software at all, but Dave 
is a really smart guy and he's put a huge amount of work into designing and 
fine tuning his Capacity Planning Tool, which is now available. One used to 
have to go take the ESRI System Design Class in order to get a copy of the 
tool. I took it a couple years ago from Dave, and can attest to his 
thoroughness in building the CPT. You can download updated versions of the CPT 
from the website now. 

http://gis.esri.com/esripress/display/index.cfm?fuseaction=displaywebsiteID=141moduleID=42

The CPT is pretty complex and does take some training to use properly, so 
unless you're going to take the system design class, you probably ought to get 
the book. It would be great if, one day, a similar tool was available for 
Mapserver/Geoserver/PostGIS systems (hint, hint listserv experts). 
Unfortunately, I'm just not knowledgeable enough about the inner guts of the 
OpenGIS softwares yet to be able to convert all the formulas in Dave's 
spreadsheet to something more appropriate for an OpenGIS system.

I was a little surprised to see just how *much* server hardware and network 
bandwidth it would *really* take to implement a usable ESRI server-based GIS 
system for my organization, which has offices all over the state and crappy 
bandwidth in a lot of the more remote places, not to mention the uncountable 
anonymous public users. Right now we've got AGS running on a single server, and 
it is dog slow and needs a lot of babying. When I told my IT overlords that 
I'd need at least 2 more load balanced GIS processing servers and a separate 
production GIS database server to speed things up to an acceptable level, well, 
they just laughed at me. Mapserver, PostGIS and Geoserver all run OK, but not 
blazingly fast on a single, older shared GIS server for me. AGS gets the 
other, newer GIS server all to itself - and is still a complete pig. Sure, the 
OpenGIS software would be a lot faster if they each had their own dedicated 
box, but in this budget climate, extra funding for more hardware is just not 
possible...

Hope this helps,

Julia Harrell
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss