Hi,
I'm looking at the survey too and feel a bit the same as Peter. The first
question seems to suggest transforming current Charter membership into regular
membership, but following questions seem to leave open the possibility for the
2 kinds of membership.
Perhaps the first question should
Hi Vasile all,
having tried to fill in the questionnaire I see one main issue: It seems like
OSGeo Charter membership = OSGeo membership.
Not sure it is intended, as my feeling (which may be wrong) is that a Charter
member is more like an advisory board member whereas general membership is where
Hi Vasile,
Looks good.
Some minor suggestions for tweaks from me:
Page 1:
From: During the years the charter members selection procedure SUFFERED
minor and major changes
To__: During the years the charter members selection procedure HAD minor
and major changes
Comment: Suffered implies the
Dear all,
Please accept my apologies for all the delays related to this survey.
You can all check the actual structure of the survey at
https://survey.des.ucdavis.edu/osgeo/index.php/survey/index/sid/879386/newtest/Y/lang/en
*Please do not execute the survey!* Separate invitations will be
Vasile,
The survey looks excellent but a minor structural change suggestion
would be to put the voting questions last. The reason for this change is
that the voting should be based on how you think about the later
questions. By reversing the order of these you force the user to think
about
