Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Marketing] OSGeo symbols set

[María Arias de Reyna]

As I understand it, this kind of greyish styles are used when you want to
show the full list but don't want people to get distracted with each and
every icon. But I'm not a designer expert.

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 2:05 AM Vicky Vergara  wrote:

> I still dont understand why does pgRouting logo and many others have to
> lose the colors.
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 8:03 AM nicolas bozon 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have updated the OSGeo symbols set according to your feedbacks.
>>
>> Updated Preview:
>> https://nbozon.github.io/OSGeo/symbols-set/
>>
>> Updated material:
>>
>> https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/pull/206/commits/d4cf2ebc76e3429953980a38dd047d3003a7
>>
>>
>> Basic changelog:
>>
>> - Removed every symbols considered as non-compliant to our brand
>> guidelines
>> - Removed the Get-It project logo which is not a community project at all
>> - Corrected PostGIS and PgRouting elephant logos (so a bit less scalable
>> now)
>> - Corrected mapfish and pywps logos (added missing text)
>> - Renamed live to osgeolive
>>
>> As nothing that may considered as non compliant to our guidelines
>> remains, and that the first batch of community feedbacks have been taken
>> into account, may i suggest that the OSGeo symbols set could now be pulled
>> into the branding repo ?
>>
>> Thanks in advance for any comment
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Nick
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Le mer. 21 nov. 2018 à 00:30, Jody Garnett  a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Hi Jody,
>>>

 Thank you for your constructive feedbacks.

 I am a bit confused on this one - part of the point of having our mark
> was to use it everywhere on all the OSGeo things.
>
 Our mark is our beloved compass, and these variations on the compass
 are meant to represent all the OSGeo things :)

>>>
>>>
  I get your point here, but i think these symbols could be great to
 help differenciate the many facets of OSGeo.
 Imagine a new comer that could for example identify each of our
 activity very clearly. I think that symbols might help him to
 understand the foundation and find his way, with always the compass
 shape in mind of course :)

>>>
>>> I understand, and indeed I assumed we would go with the sub brand
>>> approach myself. As such I am not the best person to do the pros/cons
>>> between the ideas :)
>>>
>>> This is a case where I love your work, and want to double check our
>>> strategy.
>>>
>>> The style guide is here:
>>> https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/tree/master/marketing/branding
>>>
>>> The summary has:
>>>
>>> *Logos are as provided for OSGeo and sub-brands (all of which include
 the unalterned OSGeo mark). Distinct brands (such as GeoForAll and OSGeo
 Live) maintain their own mark.*
 *While logos have been produced with Miriam Libre Bold and Sintony
 Regular the resulting shapes have been reduced to outlines for use on
 systems that do not have the correct fonts available. A template has been
 provided for the generation of additional sub-brand logos.*
>>>
>>>
>>> aside: We really need this converted to html for our website.
>>>
>>> You are right, and i think Boundless did a great elephant design on the
 old OpenGeo Suite, so i got inspired :)
 Slonik is a lovely but very detailed SVG, so difficult to integrate in
 such a symbol set. That's why i decided to use a simpler one.
 I will try to modify it before the PostGIS folks complain :)

>>>
>>> Chance for collaboration rather than complaints, I think everyone can
>>> see the design limitation.
>>>
>>> Our OSGeo compass outline does not "quite" work, since there is not much
>>> room for the project identify inside. I think we had sub branding as a
>>> priority we would of done it a little bit different.
>>>
>>>
 - get-it just added themselves to the website wrong and have not yet
> asked to be a community project? I am trying to confirm now ...
>

 Whoa, my bad, sorry ! i didn't know one could become a Community
 Project so easily :)

>>>
>>> We like projects to ask, the code and project is reviewed on the
>>> incubation list, etc..
>>>
>>>
 Yes, please confirm with the Incubation Committee about their
 application. I see you already removed it from the website so i will remove
 it from the set.

>>>
>>> Yeah I may of messed up there, trying to figure it out.
>>>

 - Loader is being added (it is approved but still has a draft web page)
>

 Good point, will plan to integrate the Loader logo, but i can't find it
 by now :(

>>>
>>> To be honest I do not think they have a logo.
>>>

 - GC2/Vidi was just added yesterday
>

 Yes, and the Mapcentia logo is already in the set. I understand both
 GC2 and Vidi use the same logotype right ?

>>>
>>> Yeah and that is the logo of the company so ... not the best logo for
>>> the project? Actually if you wanted to stop by the incubation list we could
>>> talk to the projects dir

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Marketing] OSGeo symbols set

[adam steer]

Hi Nicolas

These are great! Thanks for making them happen, and thanks everyone for
working to make them better

Cheers
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Marketing] OSGeo symbols set

[Vicky Vergara]

I still dont understand why does pgRouting logo and many others have to
lose the colors.


On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 8:03 AM nicolas bozon 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have updated the OSGeo symbols set according to your feedbacks.
>
> Updated Preview:
> https://nbozon.github.io/OSGeo/symbols-set/
>
> Updated material:
>
> https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/pull/206/commits/d4cf2ebc76e3429953980a38dd047d3003a7
>
>
> Basic changelog:
>
> - Removed every symbols considered as non-compliant to our brand guidelines
> - Removed the Get-It project logo which is not a community project at all
> - Corrected PostGIS and PgRouting elephant logos (so a bit less scalable
> now)
> - Corrected mapfish and pywps logos (added missing text)
> - Renamed live to osgeolive
>
> As nothing that may considered as non compliant to our guidelines remains,
> and that the first batch of community feedbacks have been taken into
> account, may i suggest that the OSGeo symbols set could now be pulled into
> the branding repo ?
>
> Thanks in advance for any comment
>
> Best,
>
> Nick
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Le mer. 21 nov. 2018 à 00:30, Jody Garnett  a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi Jody,
>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for your constructive feedbacks.
>>>
>>> I am a bit confused on this one - part of the point of having our mark
 was to use it everywhere on all the OSGeo things.

>>> Our mark is our beloved compass, and these variations on the compass are
>>> meant to represent all the OSGeo things :)
>>>
>>
>>
>>>  I get your point here, but i think these symbols could be great to help
>>> differenciate the many facets of OSGeo.
>>> Imagine a new comer that could for example identify each of our activity
>>> very clearly. I think that symbols might help him to
>>> understand the foundation and find his way, with always the compass
>>> shape in mind of course :)
>>>
>>
>> I understand, and indeed I assumed we would go with the sub brand
>> approach myself. As such I am not the best person to do the pros/cons
>> between the ideas :)
>>
>> This is a case where I love your work, and want to double check our
>> strategy.
>>
>> The style guide is here:
>> https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/tree/master/marketing/branding
>>
>> The summary has:
>>
>> *Logos are as provided for OSGeo and sub-brands (all of which include the
>>> unalterned OSGeo mark). Distinct brands (such as GeoForAll and OSGeo Live)
>>> maintain their own mark.*
>>> *While logos have been produced with Miriam Libre Bold and Sintony
>>> Regular the resulting shapes have been reduced to outlines for use on
>>> systems that do not have the correct fonts available. A template has been
>>> provided for the generation of additional sub-brand logos.*
>>
>>
>> aside: We really need this converted to html for our website.
>>
>> You are right, and i think Boundless did a great elephant design on the
>>> old OpenGeo Suite, so i got inspired :)
>>> Slonik is a lovely but very detailed SVG, so difficult to integrate in
>>> such a symbol set. That's why i decided to use a simpler one.
>>> I will try to modify it before the PostGIS folks complain :)
>>>
>>
>> Chance for collaboration rather than complaints, I think everyone can see
>> the design limitation.
>>
>> Our OSGeo compass outline does not "quite" work, since there is not much
>> room for the project identify inside. I think we had sub branding as a
>> priority we would of done it a little bit different.
>>
>>
>>> - get-it just added themselves to the website wrong and have not yet
 asked to be a community project? I am trying to confirm now ...

>>>
>>> Whoa, my bad, sorry ! i didn't know one could become a Community Project
>>> so easily :)
>>>
>>
>> We like projects to ask, the code and project is reviewed on the
>> incubation list, etc..
>>
>>
>>> Yes, please confirm with the Incubation Committee about their
>>> application. I see you already removed it from the website so i will remove
>>> it from the set.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah I may of messed up there, trying to figure it out.
>>
>>>
>>> - Loader is being added (it is approved but still has a draft web page)

>>>
>>> Good point, will plan to integrate the Loader logo, but i can't find it
>>> by now :(
>>>
>>
>> To be honest I do not think they have a logo.
>>
>>>
>>> - GC2/Vidi was just added yesterday

>>>
>>> Yes, and the Mapcentia logo is already in the set. I understand both GC2
>>> and Vidi use the same logotype right ?
>>>
>>
>> Yeah and that is the logo of the company so ... not the best logo for the
>> project? Actually if you wanted to stop by the incubation list we could
>> talk to the projects directly.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks again and talk soon
>>>
>>
>> Indeed!
>> Jody
>>
> ___
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss



-- 

Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
Salzmannstraße 44,
81739 München, Germany

Vicky Vergara
Operations Research

eMail: vi...@georepublic.de
Web: https://georepu

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Marketing] OSGeo symbols set

[nicolas bozon]

Hi all,

I have updated the OSGeo symbols set according to your feedbacks.

Updated Preview:
https://nbozon.github.io/OSGeo/symbols-set/

Updated material:
https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/pull/206/commits/d4cf2ebc76e3429953980a38dd047d3003a7


Basic changelog:

- Removed every symbols considered as non-compliant to our brand guidelines
- Removed the Get-It project logo which is not a community project at all
- Corrected PostGIS and PgRouting elephant logos (so a bit less scalable
now)
- Corrected mapfish and pywps logos (added missing text)
- Renamed live to osgeolive

As nothing that may considered as non compliant to our guidelines remains,
and that the first batch of community feedbacks have been taken into
account, may i suggest that the OSGeo symbols set could now be pulled into
the branding repo ?

Thanks in advance for any comment

Best,

Nick







Le mer. 21 nov. 2018 à 00:30, Jody Garnett  a
écrit :

> Hi Jody,
>
>>
>> Thank you for your constructive feedbacks.
>>
>> I am a bit confused on this one - part of the point of having our mark
>>> was to use it everywhere on all the OSGeo things.
>>>
>> Our mark is our beloved compass, and these variations on the compass are
>> meant to represent all the OSGeo things :)
>>
>
>
>>  I get your point here, but i think these symbols could be great to help
>> differenciate the many facets of OSGeo.
>> Imagine a new comer that could for example identify each of our activity
>> very clearly. I think that symbols might help him to
>> understand the foundation and find his way, with always the compass shape
>> in mind of course :)
>>
>
> I understand, and indeed I assumed we would go with the sub brand approach
> myself. As such I am not the best person to do the pros/cons between the
> ideas :)
>
> This is a case where I love your work, and want to double check our
> strategy.
>
> The style guide is here:
> https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/tree/master/marketing/branding
>
> The summary has:
>
> *Logos are as provided for OSGeo and sub-brands (all of which include the
>> unalterned OSGeo mark). Distinct brands (such as GeoForAll and OSGeo Live)
>> maintain their own mark.*
>> *While logos have been produced with Miriam Libre Bold and Sintony
>> Regular the resulting shapes have been reduced to outlines for use on
>> systems that do not have the correct fonts available. A template has been
>> provided for the generation of additional sub-brand logos.*
>
>
> aside: We really need this converted to html for our website.
>
> You are right, and i think Boundless did a great elephant design on the
>> old OpenGeo Suite, so i got inspired :)
>> Slonik is a lovely but very detailed SVG, so difficult to integrate in
>> such a symbol set. That's why i decided to use a simpler one.
>> I will try to modify it before the PostGIS folks complain :)
>>
>
> Chance for collaboration rather than complaints, I think everyone can see
> the design limitation.
>
> Our OSGeo compass outline does not "quite" work, since there is not much
> room for the project identify inside. I think we had sub branding as a
> priority we would of done it a little bit different.
>
>
>> - get-it just added themselves to the website wrong and have not yet
>>> asked to be a community project? I am trying to confirm now ...
>>>
>>
>> Whoa, my bad, sorry ! i didn't know one could become a Community Project
>> so easily :)
>>
>
> We like projects to ask, the code and project is reviewed on the
> incubation list, etc..
>
>
>> Yes, please confirm with the Incubation Committee about their
>> application. I see you already removed it from the website so i will remove
>> it from the set.
>>
>
> Yeah I may of messed up there, trying to figure it out.
>
>>
>> - Loader is being added (it is approved but still has a draft web page)
>>>
>>
>> Good point, will plan to integrate the Loader logo, but i can't find it
>> by now :(
>>
>
> To be honest I do not think they have a logo.
>
>>
>> - GC2/Vidi was just added yesterday
>>>
>>
>> Yes, and the Mapcentia logo is already in the set. I understand both GC2
>> and Vidi use the same logotype right ?
>>
>
> Yeah and that is the logo of the company so ... not the best logo for the
> project? Actually if you wanted to stop by the incubation list we could
> talk to the projects directly.
>
>
>
>>
>> Thanks again and talk soon
>>
>
> Indeed!
> Jody
>
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Marketing] OSGeo symbols set

[Jody Garnett]

Hi Jody,

>
> Thank you for your constructive feedbacks.
>
> I am a bit confused on this one - part of the point of having our mark was
>> to use it everywhere on all the OSGeo things.
>>
> Our mark is our beloved compass, and these variations on the compass are
> meant to represent all the OSGeo things :)
>


>  I get your point here, but i think these symbols could be great to help
> differenciate the many facets of OSGeo.
> Imagine a new comer that could for example identify each of our activity
> very clearly. I think that symbols might help him to
> understand the foundation and find his way, with always the compass shape
> in mind of course :)
>

I understand, and indeed I assumed we would go with the sub brand approach
myself. As such I am not the best person to do the pros/cons between the
ideas :)

This is a case where I love your work, and want to double check our
strategy.

The style guide is here:
https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/tree/master/marketing/branding

The summary has:

*Logos are as provided for OSGeo and sub-brands (all of which include the
> unalterned OSGeo mark). Distinct brands (such as GeoForAll and OSGeo Live)
> maintain their own mark.*
> *While logos have been produced with Miriam Libre Bold and Sintony Regular
> the resulting shapes have been reduced to outlines for use on systems that
> do not have the correct fonts available. A template has been provided for
> the generation of additional sub-brand logos.*


aside: We really need this converted to html for our website.

You are right, and i think Boundless did a great elephant design on the old
> OpenGeo Suite, so i got inspired :)
> Slonik is a lovely but very detailed SVG, so difficult to integrate in
> such a symbol set. That's why i decided to use a simpler one.
> I will try to modify it before the PostGIS folks complain :)
>

Chance for collaboration rather than complaints, I think everyone can see
the design limitation.

Our OSGeo compass outline does not "quite" work, since there is not much
room for the project identify inside. I think we had sub branding as a
priority we would of done it a little bit different.


> - get-it just added themselves to the website wrong and have not yet asked
>> to be a community project? I am trying to confirm now ...
>>
>
> Whoa, my bad, sorry ! i didn't know one could become a Community Project
> so easily :)
>

We like projects to ask, the code and project is reviewed on the incubation
list, etc..


> Yes, please confirm with the Incubation Committee about their application.
> I see you already removed it from the website so i will remove it from the
> set.
>

Yeah I may of messed up there, trying to figure it out.

>
> - Loader is being added (it is approved but still has a draft web page)
>>
>
> Good point, will plan to integrate the Loader logo, but i can't find it by
> now :(
>

To be honest I do not think they have a logo.

>
> - GC2/Vidi was just added yesterday
>>
>
> Yes, and the Mapcentia logo is already in the set. I understand both GC2
> and Vidi use the same logotype right ?
>

Yeah and that is the logo of the company so ... not the best logo for the
project? Actually if you wanted to stop by the incubation list we could
talk to the projects directly.



>
> Thanks again and talk soon
>

Indeed!
Jody
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Marketing] OSGeo symbols set

[nicolas bozon]

Hi Jody,

Thank you for your constructive feedbacks.

I am a bit confused on this one - part of the point of having our mark was
> to use it everywhere on all the OSGeo things.
>

Our mark is our beloved compass, and these variations on the compass are
meant to represent all the OSGeo things :)
 I get your point here, but i think these symbols could be great to help
differenciate the many facets of OSGeo.
Imagine a new comer that could for example identify each of our activity
very clearly. I think that symbols might help him to
understand the foundation and find his way, with always the compass shape
in mind of course :)

The symbol set for "board" and "local chapter" go against this direction of
> our style guide.
>

I quite disagree here, these symbols are on the contrary designed to
strengthen our compass-based identity.
I imagine they would always be used along with the official mark (for
example on the Board or Local chapter pages, as subtitles :)

We went through one round of compromise for our style guide, for local
> chapters providing guidance on the creation of subbrands. I see no reason
> to encourage the use sub brands within our organization?
>

It would be interesting that the other Marketing Committee members express
their opinion on this one.
I would of course remove every symbol that may be considered as non
compliant to our guidelines.


> I am really enjoying the osgeo project and community project symbols :)
>

Thanks, my pleasure !


> A couple notes:
> - The osgeo-postgis is based on boundless branding for postgis (as part of
> it including it in the old osgeo suite product). The dimond shape used is
> not part of that community's branding (they have an elephant named "Slonik"
> holding the world cheerfully).
>

You are right, and i think Boundless did a great elephant design on the old
OpenGeo Suite, so i got inspired :)
Slonik is a lovely but very detailed SVG, so difficult to integrate in such
a symbol set. That's why i decided to use a simpler one.
I will try to modify it before the PostGIS folks complain :)
That is also true for the PgRouting elephant btw, beautiful but does not
scale well when used within a webfont.


> - get-it just added themselves to the website wrong and have not yet asked
> to be a community project? I am trying to confirm now ...
>

Whoa, my bad, sorry ! i didn't know one could become a Community Project so
easily :)
Yes, please confirm with the Incubation Committee about their application.
I see you already removed it from the website so i will remove it from the
set.

- Loader is being added (it is approved but still has a draft web page)
>

Good point, will plan to integrate the Loader logo, but i can't find it by
now :(

- GC2/Vidi was just added yesterday
>

Yes, and the Mapcentia logo is already in the set. I understand both GC2
and Vidi use the same logotype right ?


Thanks again and talk soon

Best,

Nicolas




--
> Jody Garnett
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 12:28, nicolas bozon 
> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I have finally been able to put together and publish a first version of
>> the OSGeo symbols set.
>>
>> This is a visual representation of the OSGeo projects and activities
>> aimed at supplementing the Foundation branding material.
>>
>> A preview of the OSGeo symbols set is available here:
>> https://nbozon.github.io/OSGeo/symbols-set/
>>
>> The 48 symbols fall into four categories:
>> - Foundation (OSGeo fundamentals represented by 'Variations on the
>> Compass')
>> - Initiatives (mostly based on the compass shape too)
>> - Projects (derived OSGeo project logos)
>> - Community (derived Community projects logos)
>>
>> The set is made of two parts, both copyrighted OSGeo:
>> - The source SVG documents, licensed under CC-BY-SA
>>  (see
>> https://github.com/nbozon/osgeo/tree/OSGeo-symbols-set/marketing/branding/symbols/svg
>> )
>> - A cross-browser webfont, licensed under OFL.
>> (see
>> https://github.com/nbozon/osgeo/tree/OSGeo-symbols-set/marketing/branding/symbols/font
>> )
>>
>> Important notes:
>> - Some projects do not have a logotype, only logotext, and cannot be
>> included in the set at this stage (namely PROJ, GEOS, OSSIM and Degree).
>> - Some projects logos were heavily modified or redrawn, in order to
>> ensure constistency and scalability. I'm listening to project owners
>> feedbacks and will be glad to work towards better solutions if needed.
>> - All 48 symbols are made available as black SVG. The 16 Foundation and
>> Initiatives icons are also available in color, based on our brand
>> guidelines.
>> - This work may not be exhaustive and is subject to change.
>>
>> Hope you will like it !
>>
>> Reviews, comments and ideas are most welcome in the related PR:
>> https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/pull/206
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Nicolas Bozon
>> ___
>> Marketing mailing list
>> market...@lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
>
>
_

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Marketing] OSGeo symbols set

[Jody Garnett]

I am a bit confused on this one - part of the point of having our mark was
to use it everywhere on all the OSGeo things.

The symbol set for "board" and "local chapter" go against this direction of
our style guide.

We went through one round of compromise for our style guide, for local
chapters providing guidance on the creation of subbrands. I see no reason
to encourage the use sub brands within our organization?

I am really enjoying the osgeo project and community project symbols :) A
couple notes:
- The osgeo-postgis is based on boundless branding for postgis (as part of
it including it in the old osgeo suite product). The dimond shape used is
not part of that community's branding (they have an elephant named "Slonik"
holding the world cheerfully).
- get-it just added themselves to the website wrong and have not yet asked
to be a community project? I am trying to confirm now ...
- Loader is being added (it is approved but still has a draft web page)
- GC2/Vidi was just added yesterday
--
Jody Garnett


On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 12:28, nicolas bozon  wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> I have finally been able to put together and publish a first version of
> the OSGeo symbols set.
>
> This is a visual representation of the OSGeo projects and activities aimed
> at supplementing the Foundation branding material.
>
> A preview of the OSGeo symbols set is available here:
> https://nbozon.github.io/OSGeo/symbols-set/
>
> The 48 symbols fall into four categories:
> - Foundation (OSGeo fundamentals represented by 'Variations on the
> Compass')
> - Initiatives (mostly based on the compass shape too)
> - Projects (derived OSGeo project logos)
> - Community (derived Community projects logos)
>
> The set is made of two parts, both copyrighted OSGeo:
> - The source SVG documents, licensed under CC-BY-SA
>  (see
> https://github.com/nbozon/osgeo/tree/OSGeo-symbols-set/marketing/branding/symbols/svg
> )
> - A cross-browser webfont, licensed under OFL.
> (see
> https://github.com/nbozon/osgeo/tree/OSGeo-symbols-set/marketing/branding/symbols/font
> )
>
> Important notes:
> - Some projects do not have a logotype, only logotext, and cannot be
> included in the set at this stage (namely PROJ, GEOS, OSSIM and Degree).
> - Some projects logos were heavily modified or redrawn, in order to ensure
> constistency and scalability. I'm listening to project owners feedbacks and
> will be glad to work towards better solutions if needed.
> - All 48 symbols are made available as black SVG. The 16 Foundation and
> Initiatives icons are also available in color, based on our brand
> guidelines.
> - This work may not be exhaustive and is subject to change.
>
> Hope you will like it !
>
> Reviews, comments and ideas are most welcome in the related PR:
> https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/pull/206
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Nicolas Bozon
> ___
> Marketing mailing list
> market...@lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Marketing] OSGeo symbols set

[Nicolas Roelandt]

Thanks Nicolas,

impressive work !

Nicolas Roelandt


Le lun. 19 nov. 2018 à 21:28, nicolas bozon  a
écrit :

> Hello all,
>
> I have finally been able to put together and publish a first version of
> the OSGeo symbols set.
>
> This is a visual representation of the OSGeo projects and activities aimed
> at supplementing the Foundation branding material.
>
> A preview of the OSGeo symbols set is available here:
> https://nbozon.github.io/OSGeo/symbols-set/
>
> The 48 symbols fall into four categories:
> - Foundation (OSGeo fundamentals represented by 'Variations on the
> Compass')
> - Initiatives (mostly based on the compass shape too)
> - Projects (derived OSGeo project logos)
> - Community (derived Community projects logos)
>
> The set is made of two parts, both copyrighted OSGeo:
> - The source SVG documents, licensed under CC-BY-SA
>  (see
> https://github.com/nbozon/osgeo/tree/OSGeo-symbols-set/marketing/branding/symbols/svg
> )
> - A cross-browser webfont, licensed under OFL.
> (see
> https://github.com/nbozon/osgeo/tree/OSGeo-symbols-set/marketing/branding/symbols/font
> )
>
> Important notes:
> - Some projects do not have a logotype, only logotext, and cannot be
> included in the set at this stage (namely PROJ, GEOS, OSSIM and Degree).
> - Some projects logos were heavily modified or redrawn, in order to ensure
> constistency and scalability. I'm listening to project owners feedbacks and
> will be glad to work towards better solutions if needed.
> - All 48 symbols are made available as black SVG. The 16 Foundation and
> Initiatives icons are also available in color, based on our brand
> guidelines.
> - This work may not be exhaustive and is subject to change.
>
> Hope you will like it !
>
> Reviews, comments and ideas are most welcome in the related PR:
> https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/pull/206
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Nicolas Bozon
> ___
> Marketing mailing list
> market...@lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing



-- 
Bien cordialement,

Nicolas Roelandt
mail: roelandtn@gmail.com
mobile: +33 (0)6 42 40 42 55
twitter: @*RoelandtN42* 
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss