Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Note the LocationTech badge is not showing correctly

2017-08-19 Thread Markus Neteler
Dear all, FWIW: Helmut it also part of OSGeo's do-ocracy, being this years one of the main GSoC admins with all the related work, being active project contributor (see the related project ML) and more. Just FYI... Kind regards, Markus ___ Discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Note the LocationTech badge is not showing correctly

2017-08-18 Thread Marc Vloemans
rton <ijtur...@gmail.com> > Date: 18/08/2017 15:46 (GMT-05:00) > To: Jeffrey Johnson <ortel...@gmail.com> > Cc: OSGeo Discussions <discuss@lists.osgeo.org>, Helmut Kudrnovsky > <hel...@web.de> > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Note the LocationTec

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Note the LocationTech badge is not showing correctly

2017-08-18 Thread Maria Antonia Brovelli
; Date: 18/08/2017 15:46 (GMT-05:00) To: Jeffrey Johnson <ortel...@gmail.com> Cc: OSGeo Discussions <discuss@lists.osgeo.org>, Helmut Kudrnovsky <hel...@web.de> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Note the LocationTech badge is not showing correctly When we met up in Chicago to

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Note the LocationTech badge is not showing correctly

2017-08-18 Thread Ian Turton
When we met up in Chicago to set up OSGEO the desire was to be as inclusive as possible. I donate alot of time to OSGEO when I could be doing something fun like coding and I'm getting fed up with charter members popping up on the mailing lists and complaining about stuff that they haven't done

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Note the LocationTech badge is not showing correctly

2017-08-18 Thread Jeffrey Johnson
Just for clarity and background. We announced the project form on discuss and imported the results/submissions of that form. There hasn't been any process other than that up to now. For the record, I'm very much in favor of a "big tent" approach. If a software had an OSI approved license and

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Note the LocationTech badge is not showing correctly

2017-08-18 Thread Massimiliano Cannata
And istSOS :-) Il 18 ago 2017 5:25 PM, "Sandro Santilli" ha scritto: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:19:52PM +0200, Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote: > > > Will locationtech also promote OSGeo projects? > > This is an interesting question, especially as LocationTech is > against GPL-licensed

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Note the LocationTech badge is not showing correctly

2017-08-18 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:19:52PM +0200, Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote: > Will locationtech also promote OSGeo projects? This is an interesting question, especially as LocationTech is against GPL-licensed projects (like GRASS, QGIS, PostGIS) --strk; ___

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Note the LocationTech badge is not showing correctly

2017-08-18 Thread Venkatesh Raghavan
Hi Helmut and Maxi, Thanks for expressing your concerns about listing of projects and badges on the beta website as a part of the OSGeo "website/rebranding" initiative. As mentioned by Helena, earlier on this thread, the listing of projects and display of project badges on the beta website is

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Note the LocationTech badge is not showing correctly

2017-08-17 Thread Massimiliano Cannata
Someone would answer that is a do-ocracy :-) Apart from this, I also share the same concerns of Helmut and would like to have a clear rule/strategy on this... Best Maxi Il 17 ago 2017 9:19 PM, "Helmut Kudrnovsky" ha scritto: > (Taken from

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Note the LocationTech badge is not showing correctly

2017-08-17 Thread Helena Mitasova
Helmut - this is the open discussion that we are having, so please keep letting us know your concerns - they are not ignored and you are not alone. We need the input from the community to make the decisions on what is presented at the OSGeo web site and how. Thanks a lot for your reviews and

[OSGeo-Discuss] Note the LocationTech badge is not showing correctly

2017-08-17 Thread Helmut Kudrnovsky
(Taken from https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2017-August/035453.html) "Note the LocationTech badge is not not showing correctly" now I am, as an OSGeo charter member, really really confused about this. What I'm really missing here is an open discussion and decision making how we, as