I'm moving this email thread from discuss@lists.osgeo.org to
standa...@lists.osgeo.org.
Adrian,
It is a good idea for OSGeo members have the opportunity to participate
in OGC activities, and have a voice to air OSGeo opinions and concerns.
I think that we are already reasonably close to havin
Hi Adrian,
I agree, let's get you moving on this, so, comments inline below:
On 2013-05-31 10:45 AM, Adrian Custer wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> On the front of becoming one of the liaison members, I would appreciate
> guidance on procedure. Do we generate a formal letter to me and the OGC
> or do we no
Hey all,
On the front of becoming one of the liaison members, I would appreciate
guidance on procedure. Do we generate a formal letter to me and the OGC
or do we not yet have any procedure for this? I have just now asked
Barbara Sherman of the OGC if she is aware of any procedure on her end.
On 2013-05-30 5:57 PM, Michael Gerlek wrote:
> Adrian showed himself to be a level-headed and rational discoursant during
> the recent kerfuffle.
>
> If Adrian is willing, I'd support a motion to put him in charge of, or at
> least a member of, some sort of effort to engage with OGC to find out th
ect: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OGC liaison memberships
>OGC voting organisations typically have 1 vote, (2 people who have
>permissions to caste that vote), and each organisation has their own
>process for determining that vote.
>
>I'd suggest that OSGeo should have a committee and set of
OGC voting organisations typically have 1 vote, (2 people who have
permissions to caste that vote), and each organisation has their own
process for determining that vote.
I'd suggest that OSGeo should have a committee and set of processes for
determining the vote. One issue we are going to fac
Hi Cameron,
I've been also thinking of OGC voting rights for the OSGeo Foundation.
I wonder if we should discuss this together during the next Board
meeting. (how OSGeo can become a voting member)
-jeff
On 2013-05-30 5:31 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
> +1 from me too.
>
> Based on the depth of
+1 from me too.
Based on the depth of valuable feedback that OGC received from OSGeo
regarding Geoservices REST API, with Adrian being a significant
contributor, I believe that we have a good argument to ask for voting
rights. (We might not get it, but at least we should ask).
On 31/05/201
On 5/30/13 2:54 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Adrian,
According to http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OGC_membership we have open slots.
It seems that Arnulf and Michael can authorize it. There are some fairly
restrictive conditions on OGC individual memberships which is what this is.
You should confi
Adrian,
According to http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OGC_membership we have open slots.
It seems that Arnulf and Michael can authorize it. There are some fairly
restrictive conditions on OGC individual memberships which is what this is.
You should confirm you are going to fit.
http://www.opengeos
Hey all,
As I remember it, OSGeo has been granted a number of liaison memberships
(six?) from the OGC. Are they all being used? If not, what would be the
process to obtain one?
In past years, I have been reluctant to officially represent OSGeo and
so have paid for a membership on my own. No
11 matches
Mail list logo
