RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing' + Image Management

2008-02-21 Thread Bruce . Bannerman
IMO: Thanks for the comments Michael, I was wondering if you'd contribute;-) (Also, note that wavelet does not necessarily imply lossy anymore, as many assume. Story of my life.) Can you point me to any studies to support the claim that JPEG2000 can indeed be indeed non-lossy?

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing' + Image Management

2008-02-20 Thread Arnulf Christl
-Original Message- From: Lucena, Ivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; OSGeo Discussions Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing' Hi Randy, Bruce, That is a nice piece of advise Randy. I am sorry

RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing' + Image Management

2008-02-20 Thread Michael P. Gerlek
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy George Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 7:38 AM To: 'OSGeo Discussions' Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing' + Image Management Hi Ivan and Bruce, Interesting, other than using JAI a bit on Space

RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing'

2008-02-19 Thread Randy George
Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing' IMO: Hello everyone, I'm trying to get a feel for server 'sizing' for a **hypothetical** Corporate environment to support OS Spatial apps. Assume that: - this is a dedicated environment to allow the use of OS Spatial applications

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing'

2008-02-19 Thread Cameron Shorter
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, February 18, 2008 6:35 PM *To:* OSGeo Discussions *Subject:* [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing' IMO: Hello everyone, I'm trying to get a feel for server 'sizing' for a **hypothetical** Corporate

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing'

2008-02-19 Thread Lucena, Ivan
*To:* OSGeo Discussions *Subject:* [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing' IMO: Hello everyone, I'm trying to get a feel for server 'sizing' for a **hypothetical** Corporate environment to support OS Spatial apps. Assume that: - this is a dedicated environment to allow the use

RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing'

2008-02-19 Thread Randy George
. randy -Original Message- From: Lucena, Ivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; OSGeo Discussions Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing' Hi Randy, Bruce, That is a nice piece of advise Randy. I am sorry to intrude

RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing' + Image Management

2008-02-19 Thread Bruce . Bannerman
Discussions Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing' Hi Randy, Bruce, That is a nice piece of advise Randy. I am sorry to intrude the conversation but I would like to ask how that heavy raster manipulation would be treated by PostgreSQL/PostGIS, managed or unmanaged? Best

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing' + Image Management

2008-02-19 Thread Lucena, Ivan
: Lucena, Ivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; OSGeo Discussions Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing' Hi Randy, Bruce, That is a nice piece of advise Randy. I am sorry to intrude the conversation but I

[OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing'

2008-02-18 Thread Bruce . Bannerman
IMO: Hello everyone, I'm trying to get a feel for server 'sizing' for a **hypothetical** Corporate environment to support OS Spatial apps. Assume that: - this is a dedicated environment to allow the use of OS Spatial applications to serve Corporate OGC Services. - the applications of

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing'

2008-02-18 Thread Paul Ramsey
Bruce, On 2/18/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote - the applications of interest are GeoServer, Deegree, GeoNetwork, MapServer, MapGuide and Postgres/PostGIS. - the environment may need to scale relatively quickly. - it will be required to serve in the vicinty of 5 to 10 TB of