Al 28/05/12 18:48, En/na Mateusz Loskot ha escrit:
On 26 May 2012 19:38, Arnulf Christl (OSGeo) wrote:
By introducing a new level of decisions - for example the Charter
Members - we gain nothing.
+1 for keeping the current decision model.
I'm happy trusting the Board.
Best regards,
+1. I'm qu
On 26 May 2012 19:38, Arnulf Christl (OSGeo) wrote:
> By introducing a new level of decisions - for example the Charter
> Members - we gain nothing.
+1 for keeping the current decision model.
I'm happy trusting the Board.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
__
am happy the
way the OSGeo is steered.
Ravi Kumar
From: Puneet Kishor
To: arn...@osgeo.org
Cc: OSGeo Discussions
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2012 12:23 AM
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo Governance
On May 26, 2012, at 1:38 PM, Arnulf Christl (OSGeo) wrote:
> D
Hi,
+1 on the current decision model. If the discussions are made in an open
fashion, as being done, everyone as the possibility to express the
opinion and bring the new issues to the discussion. Maybe we need more
people paying attention about what is going on, but we don't need
another leve
Hi Arnulf and the whole OSGeo Board,
+1 as a vote of confidence in the board and in this decision by them.
Please keep things moving and if you feel things need a broader
discussion I'm sure you will let us know. I do think notices of
decisions like your email are very helpful to keep us up to
On May 26, 2012, at 1:38 PM, Arnulf Christl (OSGeo) wrote:
> Dear Members of OSGeo,
> we have an important issue on governance coming up again and again. It
> suggests that OSGeo Board decisions should be complemented by votes from
> the Charter Members when "important" and "strategic" decisions
Dear Members of OSGeo,
we have an important issue on governance coming up again and again. It
suggests that OSGeo Board decisions should be complemented by votes from
the Charter Members when "important" and "strategic" decisions have to
be taken. Something like this:
[snip]
>> For such important
