Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo Membership (was Re: [Board] motions from
June 18 meeting - making OSGeo Charter membership more exclusive)
Hi Jeff,
What’s the offensive part? I read some teasing statements in Arnulf’s
triggering style. And in fact, I think it makes perfect sense that we move to a
mo
Hi Jeff,
What’s the offensive part? I read some teasing statements in Arnulf’s
triggering style. And in fact, I think it makes perfect sense that we move to a
more regular membership of OSGeo where people even pay a small membership fee
to the foundation. Older members that loose interest in OSG
Hi Arnulf,
I don't see the need to become offensive to make your point.
Since you mention a "do-ocracy", and you have pointed out clearly what
you believe must and must not happen, are you willing to champion the
changes that you feel are needed?
We are, as always, "hiring" champions.
Yours
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22.06.2015 21:49, Jorge Sanz wrote:
> 2015-06-22 21:14 GMT+02:00 Vasile Craciunescu :
>> Sure, actually I was about to ask the board if such a survey make sense
>> before the elections and then to shape up the questions together.
>>
>
> Looking at
