RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] RE: Comparison between Proprietary and OS

2008-05-05 Thread Gavin Fleming
To: OSGeo Discussions Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] RE: Comparison between Proprietary and OS Andre Grobler wrote: ... So the hurdles for me to OS were acceptance specifically for the following reasons: Free and easy access and training of ESRI at varsity. Autocad did the same and look where

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] RE: Comparison between Proprietary and OS

2008-04-26 Thread Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo)
Here's another slightly different point of view... I like the fact that many open source projects haven't been focused on targeting users of particular brands of software. It has allowed the projects to develop to be what the developers think they should be, without a constant check like

RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] RE: Comparison between Proprietary and OS

2008-04-26 Thread Randy George
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andre Grobler Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2008 5:39 AM To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] RE: Comparison between Proprietary and OS I'm very new at OS, have worked 10 years on AV3.x and a little

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] RE: Comparison between Proprietary and OS

2008-04-26 Thread Micha Silver
Andre Grobler wrote: ... So the hurdles for me to OS were acceptance specifically for the following reasons: Free and easy access and training of ESRI at varsity. Autocad did the same and look where that got them. Linux, just mentioning command lines has me a little nervous. (I know this is

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] RE: Comparison between Proprietary and OS

2008-04-26 Thread Dan Putler
Micha observations as to what his students have in terms of hardware is an important one. In North America this past year 40% of entering undergrads went off to university toting Mac laptops. Consequently, ESRI's current Window-centric focus offers a nice opportunity for open source desktop tools