Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: [Incubator] Service Provider Directory: Prioritization

2008-02-05 Thread Jeroen Ticheler
Frank, On Feb 1, 2008, at 9:57 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote: To be clear, I'm not suggesting that OSGeo have any policy for project contributors other than that they identify contributors identified by the project PSCs. If a project PSC does not choose to identify any contributors then no

[OSGeo-Discuss] Re: [Incubator] Service Provider Directory: Prioritization

2008-02-03 Thread Dr. Markus Lupp
Frank Warmerdam schrieb: [snap] 1) Does it seem acceptable to give preferential listing (via order of returned results) to organizations identified as contributors? It is not only accepable, it is preferable. 2) Are project PSCs actually willing and interested in identifying contributors

[OSGeo-Discuss] Re: [Incubator] Service Provider Directory: Prioritization

2008-02-01 Thread Jeroen Ticheler
Hi Frank, On Feb 1, 2008, at 6:27 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote: However, being listed in the service provider directory would still be free and we would not otherwise discriminate against service providers who have not been identified as contributors. Yes This email is seeking feedback

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: [Incubator] Service Provider Directory: Prioritization

2008-02-01 Thread Jody Garnett
Jeroen Ticheler wrote: I think a PSC should establish a policy for their own project and possibly provide such listing on their own project website in the first place. This could be liberal for some, more conservative for others. OSGeo should follow the projects policy if it exists. That

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: [Incubator] Service Provider Directory: Prioritization

2008-02-01 Thread Frank Warmerdam
Frank Wrote: 2) Are project PSCs actually willing and interested in identifying contributors in a formal way? It would be up to projects to decide what criteria they want and to notify webcom of their contributors in some fashion. Jeroen Ticheler wrote: I think a PSC should establish a