Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: Staistical analysis support needed
Hi Mayank, In terms of Eclipse integration look at the statet package: http://www.walware.de/goto/statet. In terms of Java/R API (really more of a glue layer), look at the rJava package: http://www.rforge.net/rJava/, which also includes JRI (something this thread has already addressed). Given where you are in this, the R-sig-geo mailing list is really the best home for your questions at the point rather than the OSGeo-Discuss mailing list. The R-sig-geo mailing list is a very forgiving place by R mailing list standards. A word of warning, most R mailing lists are very unforgiving of questions whose answers could have been obtained from a web search prior to posting. Dan On 09/13/2010 10:17 PM, mayank_agarwal wrote: Thanks everyone for helping me, I am using R gor statistical analysis, but how does integrate with Eclipse and how is the API? ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[OSGeo-Discuss] Re: Staistical analysis support needed
Thanks everyone for helping me, I am using R gor statistical analysis, but how does integrate with Eclipse and how is the API? -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/Staistical-analysis-support-needed-tp5525745p5528939.html Sent from the OSGeo Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: Staistical analysis support needed [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Mayank, You may wish to implement this functionality via an OGC Web Processing Service. That way, if your technology requirements change in the future, you can limit the impact of the change. Bruce On 14/09/10 1:40 AM, "Alex Mandel" wrote: On 09/13/2010 06:45 AM, mayank_agarwal wrote: > > Hello Christopher, > Sorry for that, I didnt mean to be so harsh on GRASS, but as R can be > bridged with JAVA using JRI library, that's why I prefer R, and then it is > simpler in using, and I agree that both will have there pros and cons, no > doubt. > Never the less thanks for helping me so much and iI am sorry if I hurt you. Note you can also implement R code inside of Postgres. http://www.bostongis.com/PrinterFriendly.aspx?content_name=postgresql_plr_tut01 Enjoy, Alex ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: Staistical analysis support needed
On 09/13/2010 06:45 AM, mayank_agarwal wrote: > > Hello Christopher, > Sorry for that, I didnt mean to be so harsh on GRASS, but as R can be > bridged with JAVA using JRI library, that's why I prefer R, and then it is > simpler in using, and I agree that both will have there pros and cons, no > doubt. > Never the less thanks for helping me so much and iI am sorry if I hurt you. Note you can also implement R code inside of Postgres. http://www.bostongis.com/PrinterFriendly.aspx?content_name=postgresql_plr_tut01 Enjoy, Alex ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: Staistical analysis support needed
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 06:45:38AM -0700, mayank_agarwal wrote: > > Hello Christopher, > Sorry for that, I didnt mean to be so harsh on GRASS, but as R can be > bridged with JAVA using JRI library, that's why I prefer R, and then it is > simpler in using, and I agree that both will have there pros and cons, no > doubt. > Never the less thanks for helping me so much and iI am sorry if I hurt you. Not me personally :) I just like to make sure that I'm not misrepresenting projects; especially ones I don't work on :) -- Christopher Schmidt Web Developer ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[OSGeo-Discuss] Re: Staistical analysis support needed
Hello Christopher, Sorry for that, I didnt mean to be so harsh on GRASS, but as R can be bridged with JAVA using JRI library, that's why I prefer R, and then it is simpler in using, and I agree that both will have there pros and cons, no doubt. Never the less thanks for helping me so much and iI am sorry if I hurt you. -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/Staistical-analysis-support-needed-tp5525745p5526313.html Sent from the OSGeo Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: Staistical analysis support needed
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 04:02:44AM -0700, mayank_agarwal wrote: > > Thanks Christopher, > > I think R is a really good option to use, as GRASS is a desktop GIS. Er... and? I mean, R is a 'desktop statistics program', right? :) GRASS can be seen as a command line tool for performing analysis operations on a set of geospatial data. It can also be many other things, but calling it a "Desktop GIS" and dismissing it out of hand as a result is not really fair. (You might say something like "Programmatic access to the statistical options with R will be simpler than doing similar operations with GRASS"; that *might* be true, though I'm not actually sure.) In the end, for geospatial analysis, my expectation is that both GRASS and R will behave similarly; both have a psuedo-language that you use to operate on data and generate more data / statistics. Each will have different pros/cons, but "it's a desktop GIS" isn't really either :) Regards, -- Christopher Schmidt Web Developer ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[OSGeo-Discuss] Re: Staistical analysis support needed
Thanks Noli and Pieter, As I am finally going with R, thaks for your support, it really helped me. -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/Staistical-analysis-support-needed-tp5525745p5525983.html Sent from the OSGeo Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[OSGeo-Discuss] Re: Staistical analysis support needed
Thanks Christopher, I think R is a really good option to use, as GRASS is a desktop GIS. -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/Staistical-analysis-support-needed-tp5525745p5525772.html Sent from the OSGeo Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
