ED LINES
'all software at the national level must be
non-commercial open source'.
OR
Commercial to be read as Proprietary
Ravi Kumar
--- On Thu, 15/7/10, P Kishor wrote:
> From: P Kishor
> Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: land records management with open source GIS
> To: "
top posting a follow-up to an inquiry re. open source cadastral/lrm systems --
The inquiry was regarding implementation in Ecuador (by SA, I meant
South America, not South Africa -- apologies for the repeated
confusion I caused).
As of Jun 22 (my last conversation with my friend who initiated thi
rg] On
Behalf Of STEPHEN STANTON [sstan...@btinternet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 23 June 2010 10:56 a.m.
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: land records management with open source GIS
Well yes, I was stretching Tanzania into southern Africa. OK, so my radar is
currently being reali
Well yes, I was stretching Tanzania into southern Africa. OK, so my radar is
currently being realigned. I'll tell you where it is tomorrow. Maybe.
Steve
--- On Tue, 22/6/10, P Kishor wrote:
> From: P Kishor
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: land records management with open sour
;
> Steve Stanton
>
> --- On Tue, 22/6/10, P Kishor wrote:
>
>> From: P Kishor
>> Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: land records management with open source GIS
>> To: "OSGeo Discussions"
>> Date: Tuesday, 22 June, 2010, 6:12
>> Hi all,
>>
>&
P Kishor wrote:
> From: P Kishor
> Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: land records management with open source GIS
> To: "OSGeo Discussions"
> Date: Tuesday, 22 June, 2010, 6:12
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for replying, everyone. Instead of replying to each
> one of you
&g
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Michael P. Gerlek wrote:
>> > A friend of mine is working in a SA country that has a new policy that
>> > all software at the national level must be non-commercial open source.
>>
>> One of these clauses makes sense, one of them does not. Why would you
>> limit you
> > A friend of mine is working in a SA country that has a new policy that
> > all software at the national level must be non-commercial open source.
>
> One of these clauses makes sense, one of them does not. Why would you
> limit yourself to *non* commercial Open Source?
(I parsed the original
Puneet,
I'd recommend they allocate more (twice as much?, more?) for Open Source
programming and integration than they did for the "closed-source" system.
Likely there will problem domain specific holes in the system needing to be
filled in (e.g. ensuring topological integrity of parcel boun
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Christopher Schmidt
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:12:43AM -0500, P Kishor wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Thanks for replying, everyone. Instead of replying to each one of you
>> separately, I am replying to myself, primarily to add more info to
>> this query.
>>
>>
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:12:43AM -0500, P Kishor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for replying, everyone. Instead of replying to each one of you
> separately, I am replying to myself, primarily to add more info to
> this query.
>
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:24 AM, P Kishor wrote:
> > does anyone k
Hi all,
Thanks for replying, everyone. Instead of replying to each one of you
separately, I am replying to myself, primarily to add more info to
this query.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:24 AM, P Kishor wrote:
> does anyone know of an existing product, or a firm that develops such
> a product cater
12 matches
Mail list logo
