hello Kjell. from the bounding box of your file komm2.shp, I think it is using
the utm projection, zone 33. the datum is probably wgs84. you could try this
and check if the result matches the rest of the cartography:
ogr2ogr -t_srs epsg:4326 -s_srs epsg:32633 -f ESRI Shapefile
: [OSGeo-Discuss] Shapefile lacking SRS information
Hi,
We communicated briefly this summer on issues relating to the
conversion and creation of geodata. Looking through the emails from
earlier this summer, I am very thankful for the time you spent, and
hope that I am not intruding by asking one
]
To: OSGeo Discussions discuss@lists.osgeo.org; Andrew Turner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Shapefile lacking SRS information
Den 3. sep.. 2008 kl. 19.34 skrev Andrew Turner:
You have a couple of options - one would be to just
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Paul Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
As someone mentioned you need a .prj file with the same base name as your
shpae file. Looking at the data it might already be in WGS84 (geographics).
Copy the text on the following site and put it in a .prj file and then see
, 2008 5:51 PM
Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] Shapefile lacking SRS information
Hi,
We communicated briefly this summer on issues relating to the
conversion and creation of geodata. Looking through the emails from
earlier this summer, I am very thankful for the time you spent, and
hope that I am
2008/9/1 Kjell Are Refsvik [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Trying to get hold of better maps, I have been trying to get some old
shapefiles to work, but without success. They appear to have lost their
Spacial Reference System:
would GDAL's -a_srs option do the trick?
as in ogr2ogr -a_srs whatever