Bruce Bannerman wrote:
We need robust debate on these types of issues if we are to progress
them.
Ok.. let's try this :-)
I see that there are two main ways of utilising spatial information:
- producing a pretty picture that helps people understand an issue. We
have a number of types of pr
Hi Jo,
Thank you for your considered reply (...and no, I don't consider it
trollish ;-) )
We need robust debate on these types of issues if we are to progress
them.
OK, I'll try and put some more context on the original query.
I see that there are two main ways of utilising spatial infor
dear Bruce, all,
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 09:20:08AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Rob Atkinson has proposed that OSGeo may be the right body to nurture the
>development of a set of consistent ontologies describing commonly used
>spatial entities.
>This could make it much easier f
IMO:
The discussion below has been extracted from a thread currently running on
OSGeo-AustNZ that is exploring options for supporting the development of
an ANZLIC Profile to GeoNetwork.
This related discussion may be of interest to other members of the discuss
list.
Rob Atkinson has propo
