RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing' + Image Management

2008-02-21 Thread Bruce . Bannerman
IMO: Thanks for the comments Michael, I was wondering if you'd contribute;-) (Also, note that wavelet does not necessarily imply lossy anymore, as many assume. Story of my life.) Can you point me to any studies to support the claim that JPEG2000 can indeed be indeed non-lossy?

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing' + Image Management

2008-02-20 Thread Arnulf Christl
-Original Message- From: Lucena, Ivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; OSGeo Discussions Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing' Hi Randy, Bruce, That is a nice piece of advise Randy. I am sorry

RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing' + Image Management

2008-02-20 Thread Michael P. Gerlek
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy George Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 7:38 AM To: 'OSGeo Discussions' Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing' + Image Management Hi Ivan and Bruce, Interesting, other than using JAI a bit on Space

RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing'

2008-02-19 Thread Randy George
Hi Bruce, On the scale relatively quickly front, you should look at Amazon's EC2/S3 services. I've recently worked with it and find it an attractive platform for scaling http://www.cadmaps.com/gisblog The stack I like is Ubuntu+Java+ Postgresql/PostGIS + Apache2 mod_jk

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing'

2008-02-19 Thread Cameron Shorter
Randy, what an informative email. It is almost a Howto for OSGeo hardware and performance tuning. I'm not aware of anyone who has written something similar (although I admit I have not looked). I'd love to see it incorporated into an easily referenced resource - maybe a chapter in

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing'

2008-02-19 Thread Lucena, Ivan
Hi Randy, Bruce, That is a nice piece of advise Randy. I am sorry to intrude the conversation but I would like to ask how that heavy raster manipulation would be treated by PostgreSQL/PostGIS, managed or unmanaged? Best regards, Ivan Randy George wrote: Hi Bruce, On

RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing'

2008-02-19 Thread Randy George
. randy -Original Message- From: Lucena, Ivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; OSGeo Discussions Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing' Hi Randy, Bruce, That is a nice piece of advise Randy. I am sorry to intrude

RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing' + Image Management

2008-02-19 Thread Bruce . Bannerman
Discussions Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing' Hi Randy, Bruce, That is a nice piece of advise Randy. I am sorry to intrude the conversation but I would like to ask how that heavy raster manipulation would be treated by PostgreSQL/PostGIS, managed or unmanaged? Best

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing' + Image Management

2008-02-19 Thread Lucena, Ivan
: Lucena, Ivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; OSGeo Discussions Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing' Hi Randy, Bruce, That is a nice piece of advise Randy. I am sorry to intrude the conversation but I

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing'

2008-02-18 Thread Paul Ramsey
Bruce, On 2/18/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote - the applications of interest are GeoServer, Deegree, GeoNetwork, MapServer, MapGuide and Postgres/PostGIS. - the environment may need to scale relatively quickly. - it will be required to serve in the vicinty of 5 to 10 TB of