Miller
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 8:38 PM
To: 'OSGeo Discussions'
Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] WMS Performance Shootout presentation/results
I agree wholeheartedly. It looks like the bottleneck was the database.
I've been privy to some MapServer tests done by testing teams over several
months
] On Behalf Of Craig Miller
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 8:38 PM
To: 'OSGeo Discussions'
Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] WMS Performance Shootout presentation/results
I agree wholeheartedly. It looks like the bottleneck was the database.
I’ve been privy to some MapServer tests done by testing teams over
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Andrea Aime aa...@opengeo.org wrote:
During the benchmark I had very little time to run profilers, but
the few times I've tried in GeoServer the time seemed to be splitted
quite equally between data fetching, actual drawing, and output
image encoding... which
Hi,
Thanks for publishing this test for people who couldn't make it to
Sydney. I would be interested in getting the Fcgi configuration of
Mapserver in Apache. Any chance to get that ?
Regards
Guillaume
Le samedi 24 octobre 2009 à 10:39 +1100, Jeff McKenna a écrit :
For those that did not
We used a static FCGI specification
FastCgiServer /var/www/cgi-bin/mapserv.fcgi -processes 8 -initial_env
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:/opt/build/instant_client_11_1/lib:/opt/build
/arcsde_c_sdk/lib
Mike
--
Michael Smith
RSGIS Center
US Army Corps of Engineers
w: (603) 646-4765
On
Le samedi 24 octobre 2009 à 21:53 +1100, Smith, Michael ERDC-USACE-NH a
écrit :
We used a static FCGI specification
FastCgiServer /var/www/cgi-bin/mapserv.fcgi -processes 8 -initial_env
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:/opt/build/instant_client_11_1/lib:/opt/build
/arcsde_c_sdk/lib
Mike
Smith, Michael ERDC-USACE-NH wrote:
We used a static FCGI specification
FastCgiServer /var/www/cgi-bin/mapserv.fcgi -processes 8 -initial_env
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:/opt/build/instant_client_11_1/lib:/opt/build
/arcsde_c_sdk/lib
Mike,
I added this info into the shared slides (on the
Anyone know why Mapguide OS wasn't represented? I'd be happy to set one up
if there is a conference in my area (Seattle/Vancouver BC area).
Craig
-Original Message-
From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org]
On Behalf Of Jeff McKenna
Sent: Friday,
Unfortunately, no one stepped up to represent mapguide.
Cheers
Paul
On 2009-10-23, at 9:28 PM, Craig Miller wrote:
Anyone know why Mapguide OS wasn't represented? I'd be happy to set
one up
if there is a conference in my area (Seattle/Vancouver BC area).
Craig
-Original
It was really interesting. The very close results suggests to me that the
bottlenecks were external to the WMS and more related to external
limitations like the ability to supply things like I/O. It would be
interesting to have profiling data on where the response time was spent. For
Mapserver
/
From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of antti roppola
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 7:34 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] WMS Performance Shootout presentation/results
It was really interesting. The very close results
Craig Miller ha scritto:
I agree wholeheartedly. It looks like the bottleneck was the database.
I’ve been privy to some MapServer tests done by testing teams over
several months and the result there was always deploying the data with
long update cycles to the middle tier disks instead of
12 matches
Mail list logo
