Mnyb wrote:
> You could pick up Squeezebox Touch . its generally better for most use
> cases . Better format support better wifi better app support , better
> audio quality (measurably better , like all modern digital stuff
> probably beyond human hearing , but its nominally better ).
>
>
markm wrote:
> Right now using Windows 7, but I see the visualizations only work in
> linux/osx so I'll have to switch it up.
>
> I did some playing around with the Joggler screen and have successfully
> 'upsized' the main screen, album art and re-positioned the 'now playing'
> info so it
If your friend's laptop's WiFi module supports access point technology,
you could establish an access point on the laptop to make its LMS
accessible for any device in its vicinity, including smartphones and
tablets. We use the same technology to turn' Raspberry Pi's into mobile
media centers '
While Sonos would replace your existing Squeezebox infrastructure, the
Pi with Max2Play would in fact extend it. Our system show up the same as
the original Squeezeboxes in your Server interface and perfectly
complement and expands multiroom Squeezebox applications.
I've looked at Sonos, Pi devices but until my Squeeze World stops
working there just is no point. With the new Spotify work around for
us "oldies" without a touch it just keeps going and going ;)
Boom, Receiver, Squeezelite, Android Squeezer and Android Squeeze Player
playback
LMS 7.8 on HP
I would suggest that you buy an external drive and copy all of your
music over to it as soon as possible. You can then change LMS to point
to your external drive.
If you are having problems booting up, you don't want to wait for the
day that it won't boot up!
I would strongly suggest you get
It's really a question of what you want to accomplish. If you are
playing music through your stereo system (as distinct from only through
the computers) there are advantages to having an always-on system. I'm
on Windows platforms, so my own setup may not be relevant to you, but I
use a dedicated
HipGirl wrote:
> You need to use a program to compress your files, then you can store
> more music.
Actually ALAC files are already compressed pretty efficiently (almost as
efficiently as FLAC), so a separate compression program won't be able to
improve the result much (unless you have enormous
Suggest he just buy a cheap WiFi G router.
toby10's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12553
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106350
My friend has a laptop (probably Windows) with a wi-fi adaptor but does
not have any form of home internet access or a wireless router. Is it
still possible to use a phone app to control LMS installed on the
laptop?
jfbusch wrote:
> i've been storing my music files in apple lossless format on a mac mini
> which is nearly maxed out in hard disk capacity and other hardware
> aspects such it is hardly able to boot up and play music. time to change
> things around. my thought is to upgrade my MacBook pro to one
You need to use a program to compress your files, then you can store
more music. Of course, you still need to transfer them to your Mac or PC
in case you have no room for other infos of your phone.
HipGirl's Profile:
12 matches
Mail list logo
