RE: [slim] Better forum please!

2005-04-05 Thread Christopher Jacob
The list vs. forum debate pops up on _every_ mailing list every few month. Sometimes people snap and the flames begin. The short answer is, use the read-only forums that SD provides and send an email if you need to post. ~c -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:discuss-

RE: [slim] Better forum please!

2005-04-05 Thread Christopher Jacob
STOP STOP STOP This is a religious argument, and as such nobody is going to win. There are numerous ways to read the information posted to this list. Find the one that you like best and use it. IF you can't find _any_ that make you happy, start your own. ~chris -Original Message-

RE: [slim] Better forum please!

2005-04-05 Thread Christopher Jacob
: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 9:40 AM To: Slim Devices Discussion Subject: RE: [slim] Better forum please! Whooh ... change is REALLY scary! (is that why you're missing the point?) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christopher Jacob Sent

RE: [slim] New stations added to Slim Devices' Picks

2005-03-18 Thread Christopher Jacob
And I just learned that WHFS out in Washington DC changed from alt-rock to Spanish a few months ago. I lived in the DC area for five years in the 90s. Sigh. Ah WHFS... In it's day one of the best radio stations ever. (I grew up in Baltimore, and now live up the road in Frederick) It

RE: [slim] Snooze!

2005-03-11 Thread Christopher Jacob
Dude, that's awesome!!! Although I can't read the language... Is it actually for sale, or just a joke? I can think of a _bunch of applications for a switch set up like that!!! ~c -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:discuss- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack Coates

RE: [slim] New Squeezebox?

2005-03-02 Thread Christopher Jacob
Are you kidding me??? Dude, get a life. ~c -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:discuss- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonas Nordström Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 10:03 AM To: Slim Devices Discussion Subject: Re: [slim] New Squeezebox? Please don't use

RE: [slim] New Squeezebox?

2005-03-02 Thread Christopher Jacob
I don't care... I'm not buying another SB until they get the Pony enhancement worked out... 802.11g Larger buffer New processor with native FLAC decoding bit-accurate stream with no phase-inversion And last but not least - a new form factor, possibly a standard component size with a larger

cRE: [slim] New Squeezebox?

2005-03-02 Thread Christopher Jacob
Then build yourself a mini-ATX PC, or buy a Mac mini and run Softsqueeze. The whole point of a Squeezebox is to have a small, light, low-power, and **fanless** box that just plays music and plays it well. I think the current design is just fine, though it took me a while to get used to

RE: Inaccurate time problem SOLVED (was RE: [slim] Slimbox-Newbie withquestions)

2005-02-26 Thread Christopher Jacob
That is awesome... Not that you had the problem, just that it was something so needle in the haystack-ish and you found it! ~c -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:discuss- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Pernegger Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2005 4:54 AM To:

RE: [slim] Wireless Rebooting (formerly My NOT goodwirelessexperience)

2005-02-25 Thread Christopher Jacob
Hey Ralph, Is the machine running slim server by any chance wireless? In my experience, the squeezebox handles wireless dropouts without much problem but will reboot if the server losses network connectivity. My server is not wireless but the CAT5 that is plugged into it is missing the little

RE: [slim] Catching up

2005-02-17 Thread Christopher Jacob
Ah, the benefits of a timely and handy mailing list. Too bad you can't just go to a group of user forums, do a convenient search to find answers to simple questions like this and then return in a month or two when the urge strikes you again. You know, not too long ago people from