SilverRS8 wrote:
The opening of the file in IE is actually hardcoded for two reasons;
1. everybody has IE installed
I wouldn't say that in the company of people using free software (e.g.
the GNU/Linux OS)!
;-)
___
discuss mailing list
snarlydwarf wrote:
With debian, yes, you should do an uninstall and then an install because
the package name changed.
Thanks for this. Of course, on Debian 'uninstall' is not so simple.
Just doing aptitude remove slimserver will leave the configuration
files; is this OK?
Or do you need to
bobharp wrote:
My upgrade was relatively smooth. I renamed the old directory
(/usr/share/slimserver/) after the update to squeezecenter.
I updated the wiki.
http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.cgi?DebianPackage
Presumably you added the bits at the end about having to do more than
just the
bobharp wrote:
I just added:
-or for the development release (currently SlimServer 7.0a1)-
apt-get remove --purge slimserver
apt-get update
apt-get install squeezecenter
I doubt that a purge is necessary. I did not have to configure perl or
install libexpat1-dev.
That's good! And
funkstar wrote:
If someone makes a bad change to the Wiki, can it not be rolled back to
the previous change? I amways thought this was one of the features of
Wikis, they have a bhuilt in versiion management system. Or does that
depend on the Wiki backend software?
The problem is not so much
Michael Herger wrote:
It should not be necessary to uninstall _completely_. If you don't
uninstall, the Windows installer will do it for you. But don't throw away
your settings: they will be migrated.
What's the right procedure for debian-type distros? Do you need to
uninstall before
kdf wrote:
snip
... my recent need for a
hard drive in the UK lead me to a very nice supply of computer parts
Name? URL?
Yours,
Hopeful UK Dweller
;-)
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
Mitch Harding wrote:
I would buy the SB regardless of the label, provided it's the same SB inside.
The hardware is only part of the story. A very important part, but
still a part. Just out of interest, does anyone know what kind of
licence the SqueezeCentre Software is released under?
simonjedrake wrote:
Makes sense from a Microsoft business stratergy to get into esential
hardware that every PC user has to have, i.e Mice, Keyboards, Video
camera's, etc.
Cannot imagine that a Squeezebox will fall into this
category...
Well, sadly, the guys at The Reg can. This
ppmoore wrote:
I'm trying to install slimserver on XP. The installation works when I
specify a local path on the PC for the music folder. However, when I
specify a network drive (\\Sblan\music), or a network drive mapped to a
local drive (X:\music), it doesn't work.
IIRC, don't you have to
snarlydwarf wrote:
Diana Artemis;251734 Wrote:
... Are you talking about a CD-Rom based SqueezeCentre?
Yes, hence CD-Rom based servers.
Thanks. I wasn't sure whether you might be referring to some sort of
'live CD' distro - a sort of ClarkConnect-on-a-disc! Now there's an
idea
snarlydwarf wrote:
Look on the bottom left corner of most of their pages (ie, go to 'small
business desktop' and then look at the left under 'Shopping
Alternatives'.
I can't see this on the Dell pages here (UK). But the link for the
'Dell Outlet' in UK is
snarlydwarf wrote:
big snip
Use one of those with a copy of one of the CD-Rom based servers (I
think there is one based on Debian Linux and one based one FreeBSD)
Snarly Sorry to butt in on this thread, but I was interested in this
bit of advice, and not sure what you meant exactly. Are you
13 matches
Mail list logo