Hi Robin,
Added my first two cents to your wiki.
Seb
--
sebp
System : Mac Mini for ripping to FLAC (Max) SqueezeCenter 7.2 running
on a ReadyNAS NV+
Living room : Squeezebox 3 North Star Model 192 NuForce IA-7 v2
KEF iQ9
Bedroom : Squeezebox 3 Beresford DAC NAD C315BEE KEF iQ3
Databases like that are a bit of a chicken and egg problem. How do you
expect to populate it? In order for it to be at all useful, you'll
need to convince developers of tagging and/or ripping software to
integrate with it. That's going to be a tall order without many
thousands of CD entries
I agree with JJ, there are plenty of informations that would need to be
kept into the DB. Then, it would be up to the user deciding how he/she
wants to forge his/her tags from these informations.
As I'm using FLAC exclusively, I would for example use a single tag for
each data (eg.: one GENRE tag
I'll respond here to both yours and sepb's comments.
JJZolx wrote:
Databases like that are a bit of a chicken and egg problem. How do you
expect to populate it? In order for it to be at all useful, you'll
need to convince developers of tagging and/or ripping software to
integrate with it.
Robin Bowes;367186 Wrote:
Another of sebp's comments:
say some movement is lengthy, and for some reason it's been splitted
on
two or more tracks on one album, but left as one on another. It would
not work.
That's not going to happen in practise; if it does, it will be
relatively
Robin,
I appreciate your making the effort to think out the problems and
suggest a way forward.
Kirk McElhearn was working on an approach for classical music he called
The Well Tempered Database. His blog is at
http://www.mcelhearn.com/
He started a yahoo group which has been inactive for
Hi all,
I've been tagging a whole load of classical music recently and couldn't
help but feel that it could be a whole lot easier.
I've got the initial rumblings of an idea for a classical music version
of FreeDB and have done a bit of a braindump here:
