Re: [slim] Controller for wired Transporter?

2008-03-05 Thread ceejay
Neither of those. The base unit for the Controller is simply a battery charger. The Transporter does have two separate interfaces, wired and wireless, and can be configured to use them both in a bridge mode. But not, AFAIK, to use the wireless bit as an access point. Its presumeably physically

Re: [slim] Controller for wired Transporter?

2008-03-05 Thread slimpy
Neither 1) nor 2) is possible. The Controller can only communicate with the Receiver in ad-hoc mode. In your case you need a wireless access point/router. The controller base unit as you call it is nothing more than a charging cradle. -s. -- slimpy

Re: [slim] Controller for wired Transporter?

2008-03-05 Thread egd
if your broadband router has wireless capability and your SB3/ Transporter and Controller are in the same subnet then you can use the broadband router as a WAP. Otherwise you will need to purchase a separate WAP to add to the subnet. I've gone with a Netgear WG102 WAP. -- egd All music also

Re: [slim] Controller for wired Transporter?

2008-03-05 Thread Pat Farrell
egd wrote: Otherwise you will need to purchase a separate WAP to add to the subnet. I've gone with a Netgear WG102 WAP. As egd says, you need a wireless network. You can either buy a WAP such as the one above for ~$100, or buy a wireless router for ~$40 and use it as a WAP. I don't know why

[slim] Controller for wired Transporter?

2008-03-04 Thread gammelgam
Cheers, I have a simple question that probably has been answered already, but here it goes: I know that the Controller is supposed to function with my Transporter, but how will it work in my wired network? Which of these options will work? 1) The Transporter is wired to the Squeezecenter