RonM wrote:
> I can check that, but I'm not highly incentivized to do it, having
> solved my problem. Sometime. I presume that disc number would be set for
> the tracks in question, which wasn't set as part of the rip, so that
> would be easy to check. If I still had the files with that naming
RobbH wrote:
> I will try to restate my earlier question in a more comprehensible
> format:
>
> Is it possible that LMS thinks that a filename beginning " TS6-X" refers
> to disc number X of a multi-disc set?
>
> For that to happen, I think (but have no actual knowledge) that the
> following
I will try to restate my earlier question in a more comprehensible
format:
Is it possible that LMS thinks that a filename beginning " TS6-X" refers
to disc number X of a multi-disc set?
For that to happen, I think (but have no actual knowledge) that the
following would be necessary:
1. In
To recap, it seems that LMS is taking album definition (grouping songs
by album) from elements of the filename, and not just from the album
name associated with the song in tags. This is an illustration of the
situation, and a demonstration of the fix (which is just removing the
initial filename
To recap, it seems that LMS is taking album definition (grouping songs
by album) from elements of the filename, and not just from the album
name associated with the song in tags. This is an illustration of the
situation, and a demonstration of the fix (which is just removing the
initial filename
RonM wrote:
> There is no difference in the tags. If I modify the filename (and only
> the filename) to eliminate the, for example, TS6-6, then the odd
> behavior stops, and all files are listed under one album. The behavior
> changes even though no tags are changed, only the filename. It's
mrw wrote:
> Not entirely. If the file tags are not readable, then LMS can extract
> information from the file name. See guess tags formats in server
> settings/formats.
Interesting. I've never used that--I've always tagged before including
anything in LMS.
RonM wrote:
> There is no difference in the tags. If I modify the filename (and only
> the filename) to eliminate the, for example, TS6-6, then the odd
> behavior stops, and all files are listed under one album. The behavior
> changes even though no tags are changed, only the filename. It's
There is no difference in the tags. If I modify the filename (and only
the filename) to eliminate the, for example, TS6-6, then the odd
behavior stops, and all files are listed under one album. The behavior
changes even though no tags are changed, only the filename. It's clear
that the tags are
oldfolkie wrote:
> I'm not sure I quite understand, but it's my understanding that file
> names are totally irrelevant to LMS.
Not entirely. If the file tags are not readable, then LMS can extract
information from the file name. See guess tags formats in server
settings/formats.
RonM wrote:
> I have a series of DVDs from the Scottish/American co-produced series
> The Transatlantic Sessions, from the 90s through 2013. These feature
> musicians from the celtic tradition (Scottish/Irish mainly) and American
> roots musicians; they share common musical roots. The series
I'm not sure I quite understand, but it's my understanding that file
names are totally irrelevant to LMS. I've created separate albums for
tracks that are contained within the same file and I've created albums
that contain tracks that come from separate files. In each case, it's
the same tag
I have a series of DVDs from the Scottish/American co-produced series
The Transatlantic Sessions, from the 90s through 2013. These feature
musicians from the celtic tradition (Scottish/Irish mainly) and American
roots musicians; they share common musical roots. The series were also
released as
13 matches
Mail list logo
