bulletmark;271766 Wrote:
Now to my question of should I be the one reviewing this? - my point
is that clearly I, as mere customer/user, have no idea of whatever
changes SD has done to SC7 to invalidate those or other docs. So I
*can't* review the changes. They must be reviewed by somebody
Michael Herger;271807 Wrote:
bulletmark Wrote:
All I can point out (and did) was some parts of the doc after Michaels
edit which had to be still wrong given the tidbit comments that
Michael
had given here.
I know other companies do better regarding docs: they don't provide
JJZolx wrote:
It was a good question.
How do you so painstakingly test software for months and months on end
and not bother to look at the documentation? Or does everyone just
naturally accept that good documentation is a distant, secondary
concern and that corrections will come whenever
bulletmark;271394 Wrote:
And really, am I the one who should be reviewing this? Is this
representative of QA there at Logitech corporation?
To answer your question - Yes. We all should.
Just remember one thing this is NOT the final release. The great hard
working people at Slim Devices have
schatzy;271545 Wrote:
To answer your question - Yes. We all should.
Schatzy, thanks for your comments. If you look at the history of my
posts in this thread you will find that I was actually annoyed that I
wrote a script to set up all my artwork files optimally for SC7 based
on the inbuilt
Schatzy, thanks for your comments.
I'm sorry for being completely off topic. But phrases like this always
make me smile. I don't know why schatzy is using this name here in the
forums. But in German it means sweetie... :-)
All I can point out (and did) was some parts of the doc after
Michael Herger;270906 Wrote:
Ok, I removed a few more lines, fixed some typos. Better now?
Yes, but still poorly edited. A 20 second look of that single page
shows there still 3 references to artwork thumb files which should be
deleted.
And really, am I the one who should be reviewing this?
bulletmark;271394 Wrote:
Yes, but still poorly edited. A 20 second look of that single page shows
there still 3 references to artwork thumb files which should be
deleted.
And really, am I the one who should be reviewing this? Is this
representative of QA there at Logitech corporation?
JJZolx wrote:
bulletmark;271394 Wrote:
Yes, but still poorly edited. A 20 second look of that single page shows
there still 3 references to artwork thumb files which should be
deleted.
And really, am I the one who should be reviewing this? Is this
representative of QA there at Logitech
Yes, but still poorly edited. A 20 second look of that single page
shows there still 3 references to artwork thumb files which should be
deleted.
Feel free to edit http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.cgi?AlbumArtwork - the
integrated document will be gone soon.
And really, am I the one who
But aren't you saying that all the stuff about thumbnails is outdated?
I.e. only a single image is used for everything?
Ok, I removed a few more lines, fixed some typos. Better now?
--
Michael
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
Michael Herger;270874 Wrote:
No, I'm not saying it's completely wrong. But I'd agree that it's
outdated in that regard (which is two lines out of about a page full of
information). I'll remove this.
But aren't you saying that all the stuff about thumbnails is outdated?
I.e. only a single
right. This was achieved by simply naming one as thumb and the other as
album.
The idea of thumb and cover was to have a small preview image. If you used it
for other purposes, than yes, that feature is gone. We're now using the one
file to display in full size or preview.
--
Michael
I have asked this question in the (distant) past, but thought I would
post again in the hope that anything has changed with the release of
Squeezecenter.
In older versions of Slimserver it was possible to have two sets of
artwork for an album when using the Fishbone skin - one would display
in
Thanks for the quick reply. Don't know if anyone agrees but I think
that's a bit of a shame. I liked that feature and hoped it would come
back someday.
--
PLynas
PLynas's Profile:
I'll just mention again that I think when the user is browsing by music
folder, the browser should show other files in that folder and handle
them as the browser usually would by default. txt, pdf, jpg, bmp,
whatever, a new window/tab should open and display the txt, or handle
the pdf as you
PLynas;270647 Wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply. Don't know if anyone agrees but I think
that's a bit of a shame. I liked that feature and hoped it would come
back someday.
I have to admit that I can see little use for it. The thumbnails are
simply smaller versions of the cover art and to
Michael Herger;270645 Wrote:
The idea of thumb and cover was to have a small preview image. If you
used it for other purposes, than yes, that feature is gone. We're now
using the one file to display in full size or preview.
Hi Michael. I'm new around here and started with SC7. Noting the
Are you telling me that the SC7 inbuilt
documentation describing cover art is completely wrong and so my script
was an absolute waste of time?
No, I'm not saying it's completely wrong. But I'd agree that it's outdated
in that regard (which is two lines out of about a page full of
19 matches
Mail list logo
