stinkingpig Wrote:
Might be an idea to build them in black/white only, but have
coloured
cases available to purchase?
skins, like the cell phones now have.
or a skin in a can, :-)
http://tinyurl.com/dx56t
Which just goes to show that not all technical problems have a
New Slim reviews here:
http://www.modthebox.com/
(near the bottom of the page)
and here:
http://www.thinkcomputers.org/v2/index.php?x=reviewsid=294
--
Michaelwagner
Michaelwagner's Profile:
Khuli Wrote:
Might be an idea to build them in black/white only, but have coloured
cases available to purchase?
skins, like the cell phones now have.
or a skin in a can, :-)
http://krylon.com/main/product_template.cfm?levelid=5sub_levelid=10content=product_list
--
Jack At
Michaelwagner Wrote:
Of course, I haven't opened the box yet (just got home), but I'm pretty
sure I wasn't expecting anything else from Slim ...
That's weird... I'm sure when I (eventually) buy a Squeezebox, the
package will be ripped open before I even remove my coat. I'll
certainly not be
patrick Wrote:
I did not mean to imply that we would release more colors before
Christmas.
We have our hands full with white and black.
Might be an idea to build them in black/white only, but have coloured
cases available to purchase?
Hmm, now there's an idea... any plastics
Khuli Wrote:
Might be an idea to build them in black/white only, but have coloured
cases available to purchase?
skins, like the cell phones now have.
--
Michaelwagner
Michaelwagner's Profile:
at 6PM yesterday evening, I got this:
Dear Michael,
Thank you for placing an order with Slim Devices.
We have authorized your credit card but we will not charge it until the
order ships. At that time, you will receive an email with your tracking
number from UPS's QuantumView service.
I
A w e s o m e !
--
y1yWho3
'Buy your Apple iPOD here' (http://search.blogopt.com/search.php)
y1yWho3's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1937
View this thread:
dean Wrote:
Thanks, that should be fixed now.
On Oct 24, 2005, at 5:46 PM, gharris999 wrote:
There's a little bug on your web order form. When you select the
white,
wireless SB3, the order details page labels it as a wired SB3. It
charges the right price, though.
--
gharris999: you probably should write to the support email address ...
it isn't for sure that the right people will find your comments here
stuck on the end of an old thread.
--
Michaelwagner
Michaelwagner's Profile:
Never fear, Michaelwagner, I've already spoken to the sales folks and I
have an RMA for the white-wired one. I was just indulging in a little
snarkiness here.
--
gharris999
gharris999's Profile:
also saw the SB3 at MacExpo and was very impressed in the flesh. Already
have two on order via the slimdevices website!
Also good to catch up with Patrick Colsson (SD Marketing VP) who hinted
at the roadmap/sales figures but wouldn't give away anything concrete.
The only thing he did talk about
kefa Wrote:
bringing in additional colours for Christmas time.A Red Green Squeezebox?
--
Michaelwagner
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
@lists.slimdevices.com
Subject: [slim] Re: Announce: Third-generation Squeezebox,
SlimServer 6.2
Reply-To: Slim Devices Discussion discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
...
Also good to catch up with Patrick Colsson (SD Marketing VP) who
hinted
at the roadmap/sales figures but wouldn't give away
patrick Wrote:
I did not mean to imply that we would release more colors before
Christmas.You know what happens now, Patrick? Colour Squeezeboxen become the
new
pony (popcorn button) (until the next one comes along).
--
Michaelwagner
___
Discuss
Well, I saw the SB3 at the Mac Expo show in London today and I have got
to say when you actually see it in real life, it definitely looks
better than the SB2 (in my opinion). While the SB3 design is
understated, I thought it made more of a visual impact than the SB2
which looks more and more
stinkingpig Wrote:
mattybain wrote:
I know (hope?) you were only being humerous but calm down a little
bit!!
spelling-nazi
I think you meant he's being humerus
(http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/humerus?view=uk).
/spelling-nazi
Humerus? Are you joking? (As in funny bone.)
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 11:42 -0600, Kirk Ferguson wrote:
On 10/25/05, dean blackketter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Production has been stopped on SB2. We have a modest
inventory
remaining and they are still available from our order page at
a
discount.
Am I right in thinking that except the linear power supply, the hardware
in my squeezebox2 is not outdated at all by this new model and so people
will keep updating it?
Also, has squeezenetwork been enabled for the wma audio now?
Jono
--
jonolumb
___
Am I right in thinking that except the linear power supply, the hardware
in my squeezebox2 is not outdated at all by this new model and so people
will keep updating it?
Also, has squeezenetwork been enabled for the wma audio now?
Both questions have been answered many times: yes and very soon
dean Wrote:
Ten degrees.
On Oct 25, 2005, at 3:33 PM, DrNic wrote:
What is the recline angle like Slim Guru's??
Thank you Dean!
Nic
--
DrNic
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
i REALLY don't get it. are people's panties in a twist about their
stereo cabinets not being the right size or slim changing the case of
their unit?
PEOPLE! buy a new cabinet if it's a problem - the
bestbuy-chrome-metal-tube-and-glass cabinet you bought in the 80's
needs to be updated anyway.
I know (hope?) you were only being humerous but calm down a little bit!!
Whilst it does seem that many people do seem to be very upset that the
new release was not the hi-fi sized component they had wanted it is
kinda understandable given the lack of warning of the SB2's demise.
It must be
if all else fails take notice that the new case looks nice
enough to...horror-of-all-horrors...put it ON TOP OF your
stupid cabinet!
Well, consider that not everyone wants to see the unit regardless of
how nice it looks. Personally, looks are near irrelavent and I'd
prefer the SB to be
In all likelihood we will see a $50 price decrease on the SB3 in less
than a month, to spur more sales for the holiday season. Right now it
is in Slim Devices best interest to keep the price slightly inflated on
the SB3 to help spur the sale of the remaining inventory of SB2s that
are out there.
Sorry, should of said the lack of warning of the SB2's form factor
demise, it was obvious a new model was coming out.
And not everyone is rich enough to be able to buy several (or even one)
now.
--
mattybain
Stewie: Well, Well mother we meet again.
Lois: Stewie I thought I tucked you in an
And not everyone is rich enough to be able to buy several (or even one)
now.
Absolutely true!
--
Joe
Join me at CompuFest, June 23-25, 2006, Reno, NV
Investment Education at its Best!
http://www.CompuFest2006.com
___
Discuss mailing list
mattybain wrote:
I know (hope?) you were only being humerous but calm down a little bit!!
spelling-nazi
I think you meant he's being humerus
(http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/humerus?view=uk).
/spelling-nazi
--
Jack At Monkeynoodle Dot Org: It's A Scientific Venture!
I spent all me
stinkingpig Wrote:
mattybain wrote:
[/color]
spelling-nazi
I think you meant he's being humerus
(http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/humerus?view=uk).
/spelling-nazi
Huh? He's being an arm bone?
--
MrC
___
Discuss mailing list
Yeah, I have several great looking gadgets gathering dust in my closet. They all look attractive, but have proven to be useless / boring / no longer supported / incompatible / whatever...
Squeeze Box is NOT one of them. You got the internals right first, and then, finally, got a nice case as well.
Good work - looks nice.
A 'seperates' looking version would be good too to integrate into
people's main hi-fi stack, but we cant have everything !
Now how long until the early adopters put their 'old' SB2s onto
ebay for me to snap up ?! :)
--
gingerneil
Very cutting edge design. Wherever do these modern day designers come
up with these ideas?
[image: http://zolx.com/images/sucrets.jpg]
--
JJZolx
Jim
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
: Re: [slim] Re: Announce: Third-generation
Squeezebox, SlimServer 6.2
On 10/24/05 5:59 PM, mikey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is there anything Slim Devices can do for those of us nice repeat
customers that happened to order a Squeezebox 2 on Friday, one
business day before the new
That looks like the third SB I am going to buy this year. January 15:
SB1. March 23: SB2. And now, November 1: SB3. You guys bring out new
hardware faster than M$ do patches!
Now the only question is, do I wait 3 months for SB4 :-))
Paul
--
Paulussie
Hi there
The new design looks nice, if you want it standing around like yet
another gadget.
But personally i prefer having my SB hidden between my Surround
Decoder, and my TV, and not standing on top of something.
I sure hope you continue to sell SB2, because the SB3 is way to high.
--
theDiver Wrote:
Hi there
The new design looks nice, if you want it standing around like yet
another gadget.
But personally I prefer having my SB hidden between my Surround
Decoder, and my TV, and not standing on top of something.
I need to see the display nothing else.
I sure hope
Hi Ceejay
Thats is probably true, but what about in 6 month or 1 year ?
I think the whole idea of having a smart and slim MP3 player that can
access your CD collection from a server goes totaly haywire, when you
need that amount of space that a SB3 requires.
It is a shame, and i REALLY hope
theDiver Wrote:
p.s. Does anyone have a SB2 for sale in Europe ? Preferably Denmark ?
I am not sure if I am allowed to sell something on this forum, so I
might get my wrist slapped for this:
My wireless, platinum SB2 was 322 Euro in total (SB2 + SH + VAT). I'll
let it go for 250 euro. In
Oh you've gone and done it now guys...
I was literally about to treat myself to a new SB2, credit card at
hand, and the email about the new SB dropped into the inbox!!
Now what am I supposed to do?!!
I like the new design - sure. Slight concern about the reclined angle,
is this adjustable? what
Ditto, I was just about to buy 5 x SB2 units to kit out the whole house.
However, I'm not tempted by the SB3 design - I prefer the SB2 'lay down'
approach and it seems to be the same beast under the hood in any case.
Looks like I'll be trawling e-bay in the coming weeks especially if
there are
I have just 2 wired-only left in stock...
Stu
www.multitask-computing.co.uk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DrNic
Sent: 25 October 2005 11:45
To: discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
Subject: [slim] Re: Announce: Third-generation Squeezebox
That's a good point. I'm planning to put one on top of a wardrobe.
This means that the screen will be viewed from below. I'd be
interested to know how much having the screen tilted upwards affects
its visibility.
Max
DrNic Wrote:
I like the new design - sure. Slight concern about the
theDiver Wrote:
The new design looks nice, if you want it standing around like yet
another gadget.
You know, I was really, really hoping for an audiophile SB in a metal
case with new power supplies etc., but I really do like the design of
this and I may have to rethink my choices.
I
I really like the new design. One thing occurs to me for an SB4 though.
This new form factor could now very conveniently house an even bigger
display, say twice the height of the current display. Instead of the
single line display for the info on the track currently playing I often
wish that the
seanadams Wrote:
We are pleased to introduce the third-generation Squeezebox.
...
No offense meant to anyone at slimdevices, but as much as I love the
SB, I feel this type of design is the WRONG direction to be moving in.
I'm of the opinion that this device should blend in with your
I am in some agreement with the previous poster.
I have an old clock radio from Eckard that looks to be a twin brother
of the new SB3, so regardless of everything else, IMO you paid too
much for some fancy designer to turn a great looking product into a
mediocre looking one.
Ideally you'd
Did no-one tell Gizmodo? I expected to see the SB3 there today.
--
Fifer
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
It's on engadget already and gizmodo does always seem to lag them a
bit...
James
NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender. Sender does
not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited.
Thanks for the photos.
--
Jetlag
Huge cutbacks at work, so I'm selling:
'Marantz VP-12S1 HD DLP Projector' (http://tinyurl.com/cjdnu)
'Dish Network 6000' (http://tinyurl.com/85hap)
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
seanadams Wrote:
http://www.slimdevices.com/photos/creedence.jpeg
Gee...looks like my old wirewrapped Kim-1.
--
Michaelwagner
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
Great new design, but I would defintely recommend to keep the SB2 Model
around and maybe the drop the price a tad more.
As soon as I get some extra bucks I will upgrade, I am still a SB1
owner...
--
oscuridad
___
Discuss mailing list
Love the new box. Just to check, does the wireless version still have a
an ethernet connector on the back?
--
hardsoulwax
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
theDiver wrote:
Hi Ceejay
Thats is probably true, but what about in 6 month or 1 year ?
I just ebay'd a SliMP3 a couple of months ago for a decent sum. This
stuff holds its value, and you will be able to buy them used.
I also prefer the SB2 design, FWIW.
--
Jack At Monkeynoodle Dot
Check the connections on this photo from the Slimdevices site.
--
Jetlag
Huge cutbacks at work, so I'm selling:
'Marantz VP-12S1 HD DLP Projector' (http://tinyurl.com/cjdnu)
'Dish Network 6000' (http://tinyurl.com/85hap)
___
Discuss mailing list
I'd be amazed if it didn't, if for no other reason than that it's
required for bridging mode.
--
Fifer
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
On Oct 25, 2005, at 7:07 AM, hardsoulwax wrote:
Love the new box. Just to check, does the wireless version still
have a
an ethernet connector on the back?
Yes: http://www.slimdevices.com/ and click on Photos and/or 360
Animation
___
Discuss
Could anyone from Slimdevices.com please tell us if you will continue to
produce SB2 ?
--
theDiver
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
Production has been stopped on SB2. We have a modest inventory
remaining and they are still available from our order page at a
discount.
When this stock runs out, that's it.
-dean
On Oct 25, 2005, at 7:40 AM, theDiver wrote:
Could anyone from Slimdevices.com please tell us if you will
Sean has already said in this forum that they won't.
Max
theDiver Wrote:
Could anyone from Slimdevices.com please tell us if you will continue to
produce SB2 ?
--
max.spicer
The wild things roared their terrible roars and gnashed their terrible
teeth
and rolled their terrible eyes and
I like the design better than the Squeezebox2 personally. The old
design was very unassuming and really didn't make you stop and notice
it. That would be fine if it was component sized and intended to be
tucked away with the rest of your audio components. But since it is
designed as something
seanadams wrote:
PhilNYC Wrote:
A number of folks, including myself, replaced the wall-wart power supply
on the SB2 with a linear power supply, and the results were a positive
impact on the sound quality. I use the SB2 only via the digital out to
an external DAC, and I found that the linear
So I'm sure they were expecting some not to like the design.
Swings and roundabouts. More than a few weren't awfully excited by the
old housing. I prefer the new look but was happy to buy the SB1 2
because they did what they did much better than any available
alternative.
--
Fifer
Fifer Wrote:
Swings and roundabouts.I'm not familiar with that phrase. What does it mean?
--
Michaelwagner
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
Daryle Tilroe Wrote:
seanadams wrote:
PhilNYC Wrote:
A number of folks, including myself, replaced the wall-wart power
supply
on the SB2 with a linear power supply, and the results were a
positive
impact on the sound quality. I use the SB2 only via the digital out
to
an external
That there are arguments for and against and there's not much to choose
between either.
Max
Michaelwagner Wrote:
I'm not familiar with that phrase. What does it mean?
--
max.spicer
The wild things roared their terrible roars and gnashed their terrible
teeth
and rolled their terrible eyes
Small image change for website
http://www.squeezenetwork.com/ - has SB2 rather than SB2/3 or whatever
is the right way to say not the old stuff.
--
Paul Webster
Paul Webster
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
max.spicer Wrote:
That there are arguments for and against and there's not much to choose
between either.
Max
That must be one of those things that never floated across the pond ;)
--
Dave D
___
Discuss mailing list
Probably got bogged down in all that tea.
Max
Dave D Wrote:
That must be one of those things that never floated across the pond ;)
--
max.spicer
The wild things roared their terrible roars and gnashed their terrible
teeth
and rolled their terrible eyes and showed their terrible claws
but
I feel a little bit burned by the fact that the SB2 has only been out
what, less than a year? Had i known that it would have been this soon
for the SB3 to come out with the significant improvements in technology
and style, i would have waited.
Thanks.
--
rusty
Can anyone tell me if the display on the SB3 is a larger size, or higher
resolution than the SB2's display?
--
meb
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
rusty wrote:
I feel a little bit burned by the fact that the SB2 has only been out
what, less than a year? Had i known that it would have been this soon
for the SB3 to come out with the significant improvements in technology
and style, i would have waited.
There's no significant technology
dean Wrote:
Production has been stopped on SB2. We have a modest inventory
remaining and they are still available from our order page at a
discount.
Thats is REALLY sad to hear, what is the reason to stop the SB2
production ?
I must admit if i need another Squeezebox i will not go
rusty Wrote:
I feel a little bit burned by the fact that the SB2 has only been out
what, less than a year? Had i known that it would have been this soon
for the SB3 to come out with the significant improvements in technology
and style, i would have waited.
Thanks.
I hear that the SB4 is
>From what I understand there are no significant improvements in
technology between the SB2 and the SB3. Improvements in
style? Perhaps -- depends on your aesthetic.
Regardless, how can you feel burned? It's 6 months since they
released the SB2. I'm curious what you think they should have
done
None of the posts so far have indicated that it is. Looking at
the available pictures, the display looks identical to me.
Perhaps a SD employee can confirm?On 10/25/05, meb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:Can anyone tell me if the display on the SB3 is a larger size, or higher
resolution than the SB2's
On 10/25/05, dean blackketter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Production has been stopped on SB2.We have a modest inventoryremaining and they are still available from our order page at adiscount.When this stock runs out, that's it.
That's too bad. While I like the new design, I still
also need a
This reminds me of the agony I go through when planning a new
computer. I have an easy time deciding what current products I
want in my system. But there's always a new processor, or gpu, or
sound card, etc, that is going to be released next month. If I
waited for them, I'd never have a new
Quoting JJZolx [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
rusty Wrote:
I feel a little bit burned by the fact that the SB2 has only been out
what, less than a year? Had i known that it would have been this soon
for the SB3 to come out with the significant improvements in technology
and style, i would have waited.
Mitch Harding wrote:
This reminds me of the agony I go through when planning a new computer. I
have an easy time deciding what current products I want in my system. But
there's always a new processor, or gpu, or sound card, etc, that is going to
be released next month. If I waited for them, I'd
Exactly the same display. On Oct 25, 2005, at 10:41 AM, Mitch Harding wrote:None of the posts so far have indicated that it is. Looking at the available pictures, the display looks identical to me. Perhaps a SD employee can confirm?On 10/25/05, meb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Can anyone tell me if
--- Kirk Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/25/05, dean blackketter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Production has been stopped on SB2. We have a modest inventory
remaining and they are still available from our order page at a
discount.
When this stock runs out, that's it.
That's
1 x wireless platinum in stock at www.cooltopia.com
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 October 2005 12:03
To: 'Slim Devices Discussion'
Subject: RE: [slim] Re: Announce: Third-generation Squeezebox, SlimServer
6.2
I have just 2 wired-only left
I bought an SB1 and then they brought out the SB2. I bought an SB2 and
now they've brought out the SB3. Nobody got burned though as, funnily
enough, they still do exactly what they did when I bought them. No
actually, they do more now, as Slimserver's had several upgrades and
all for free.
--
This thread does seem to be becoming a bit of a moaners paradise.
Slim devices make the best product on the market from what I can see.
The SB3 does not change that.
I bought my SB2 in April and the product has been improved immeasurably
by the 2 software upgrades since.
Try asking Belkin or
Just wanted to throw in another vote for a squeezebox w/ a tripath amp
built in, it would make a nice compact unit for the bedroom. (Although
I think the stand-alone design of the SB3 is a big hint that this is
already coming in the future.)
--
yimmy149
Quoting oreillymj [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This thread does seem to be becoming a bit of a moaners paradise.
Slim devices make the best product on the market from what I can see.
The SB3 does not change that.
It happens every time. In fact, I've actually noted that in just about every
case, within
oreillymj wrote:
Personally I can see how the SB2 form factor makes sense for certain
uses, but the cost of manufacturing 2 different cases PCB's +
maintaining spares is probably not commercially viable.
Maybe Sean will GPL the case mould ;-)
That makes me curious... Sean, how different is
Sean and team,
Re: moving to two internal antennas...
Have you tested whether wireless reception is improved, degraded, or
identical to the SB2 in sub-optimal conditions?
Some of us run on the edge of our bandwidth sometimes, and reception
quality becomes critical.
Thanks,
Dan
--
dwc
oreillymj Wrote:
This thread does seem to be becoming a bit of a moaners paradise.
The meltdown happens everytime they release a new product. For several
days there are posts from those who are upset because either:
a) they don't like the new product as much as the old
b) they don't like the
jtfields wrote:
a) they don't like the new product as much as the old
b) they don't like the new product because it's not the design they've
been asking for every other week (read...component stereo sized or
boombox) or
c) because they purchased the now old product within the last XX
months.
Quoting Marc Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
jtfields wrote:
a) they don't like the new product as much as the old
b) they don't like the new product because it's not the design they've
been asking for every other week (read...component stereo sized or
boombox) or
c) because they purchased the now
Marc Sherman Wrote:
oreillymj wrote:
Personally I can see how the SB2 form factor makes sense for certain
uses, but the cost of manufacturing 2 different cases PCB's +
maintaining spares is probably not commercially viable.
Maybe Sean will GPL the case mould ;-)
That makes me
dwc Wrote:
Sean and team,
Re: moving to two internal antennas...
Have you tested whether wireless reception is improved, degraded, or
identical to the SB2 in sub-optimal conditions?
Some of us run on the edge of our bandwidth sometimes, and reception
quality becomes critical.
Was mounting in a wall in mind with this design? I'm remodeling my
basement and this looks perfect. Has there ever been thought of
producing a webpad like remote that could sit on a coffee table or be
mounted in a wall with a similar design? You guys rock already, dont
get me wrong, but a
: Third-generation Squeezebox, SlimServer
6.2
This thread does seem to be becoming a bit of a moaners paradise.
Slim devices make the best product on the market from what I can see.
The SB3 does not change that.
I bought my SB2 in April and the product has been improved immeasurably
by the 2 software
kdf Wrote:
That's the problem with the new height of the SB3. Too tall to leave
room for
the pony any more.
I'm not sure I undserstand the moaning and groaning about the height.
At 3.7 inches tall that's less than 2 inches taller than the
Squeezebox2 and not exactly a towering piece of
kdf Wrote:
But really, you'll just end up feeling left out when the SB5 comes along
complete with living quarters and climate control.And a pony.
--
Michaelwagner
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
Quoting jtfields [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
kdf Wrote:
That's the problem with the new height of the SB3. Too tall to leave
room for
the pony any more.
I'm not sure I undserstand the moaning and groaning about the height.
I think it's just a handy excuse. As for me, I was joking.
This thread does seem to be becoming a bit of a moaners
paradise. Slim devices make the best product on the market
from what I can see. The SB3 does not change that.
A large part of why Slim has been so good is they
allow/tolerate/encourage respectful dissent (or venting). I seen other
kdf Wrote:
Too tall to leave room for the pony any more.Have you seen the new low-rise
ponies?
--
Michaelwagner
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
