[slim] Re: Which tracks are best AKA 'to remaster or notremaster'

2006-01-17 Thread zooropa320
Looks like your reply ended up as a new thread. Keep in mind that these are different discs (potentially) mastered at different times but they have been ripped and encoded with the same settings. With all due respect Mark, I think you may be simplifying the potential differences. Think about

Re: [slim] Re: Which tracks are best AKA 'to remaster or notremaster'

2006-01-17 Thread Pat Farrell
zooropa320 wrote: Keep in mind that these are different discs (potentially) mastered at different times but they have been ripped and encoded with the same settings. Its actually worse than that. Not easier as others have implied. Back when I was ripping 40,000 CDs we had a fair number

Re: [slim] Re: Which tracks are best AKA 'to remaster or notremaster'

2006-01-17 Thread Mark Lanctot
--- zooropa320 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks like your reply ended up as a new thread. Keep in mind that these are different discs (potentially) mastered at different times but they have been ripped and encoded with the same settings. With all due respect Mark, I think you may be

[slim] Re: Which tracks are best AKA 'to remaster or notremaster'

2006-01-17 Thread zooropa320
Thanks for the input Pat. Yes, fatigue was what drove me to start this thread in hopes that there was a more reliable and consistent way to separate the wheat from the chaff. I guess I'll need to listen in small bursts to make the most accurate decisions. -- zooropa320