Looks like your reply ended up as a new thread.
Keep in mind that these are different discs (potentially) mastered at
different times but they have been ripped and encoded with the same
settings.
With all due respect Mark, I think you may be simplifying the potential
differences. Think about
zooropa320 wrote:
Keep in mind that these are different discs (potentially) mastered at
different times but they have been ripped and encoded with the same
settings.
Its actually worse than that. Not easier as others have implied.
Back when I was ripping 40,000 CDs we had a fair number
--- zooropa320
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Looks like your reply ended up as a new thread.
Keep in mind that these are different discs
(potentially) mastered at
different times but they have been ripped and
encoded with the same
settings.
With all due respect Mark, I think you may be
Thanks for the input Pat. Yes, fatigue was what drove me to start this
thread in hopes that there was a more reliable and consistent way to
separate the wheat from the chaff. I guess I'll need to listen in
small bursts to make the most accurate decisions.
--
zooropa320