Richard Elen wrote:
First, with the vast majority of users storing their music in
lossy-compressed formats with sample rates seldom exceeding 44.1 kHz and
often lower, this may be moot for a lot of people.
Agreed.
However with the
advent of lossless compression format availability in the
From: Phil Karn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kim Rochat wrote:
I've been waiting for a wireless-G version of the Squeezebox on the
assumption that it would support PCM sampling rates greater than 48kHz,
but reading the specs for the SB2 says that the digital outputs only
support 44.1 and 48. Is this
Patrick Dixon wrote:
Phil, are you seriously saying that you can design a 'brick-wall'
reconstruction filter at the Nyquist rate (fs/2)?
With reasonably modern DSP techniques such as those employed in most
modern DACs, yes. It's not *totally* brick-wall because all such filters
are impossible,
I've been waiting for a wireless-G version of the Squeezebox on the
assumption that it would support PCM sampling rates greater than 48kHz, but
reading the specs for the SB2 says that the digital outputs only support
44.1 and 48. Is this really true? If so, I'll have to wait for an SB3.
Quoting Kim Rochat [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've been waiting for a wireless-G version of the Squeezebox on the
assumption that it would support PCM sampling rates greater than 48kHz, but
reading the specs for the SB2 says that the digital outputs only support
44.1 and 48. Is this really true? If
