KDF - thank you!
--
bobkoure
bobkoure's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14646
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=44233
___
On 5-Mar-08, at 7:56 PM, MrSinatra wrote:
>
> http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=44222
I have no thoughts, but Jim has pointed you to results.
-k
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listi
kdf;275788 Wrote:
> On 5-Mar-08, at 7:31 PM, MrSinatra wrote:
> >
> > is a bug filed?
> 7424, and it's fixed in trunk (7.0.1)
> -kdf
amazing! that was quick.
btw kdf, did u see this:
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=44222
?
--
MrSinatra
www.LION-Radio.org
Using:
Squeezebox2
MrSinatra;275782 Wrote:
> is this a bug? or is it just seeing lame.exe in the SS install or
> somewhere else on my system?
>
> is a bug filed?
Bug. Filed.
...and fixed! Thanks Kevin.
--
JJZolx
Jim
JJZolx's Profile:
On 5-Mar-08, at 7:31 PM, MrSinatra wrote:
>
> is a bug filed?
7424, and it's fixed in trunk (7.0.1)
-kdf
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
i had 6.5.5
i have since installed 7.0
when i installed 7.0 it uninstalled 6.5.5 but apparently it left behind
some SS dirs, including the one with lame.exe in it.
i do not have lame.exe in any SC dir.
however, like u guys it says it appears to be correctly installed.
so...
is this a bug? o
On 5-Mar-08, at 7:08 PM, JJZolx wrote:
>
> bobkoure;275776 Wrote:
>> Sorry - I'm not being clear.
>> It indicated that lame was correctly installed -before- I'd copied
>> lame.exe in.
>> Or does "installed correctly" mean something different? I imagine it
>> could...
>
> I'm seeing the same thing
bobkoure;275776 Wrote:
> Sorry - I'm not being clear.
> It indicated that lame was correctly installed -before- I'd copied
> lame.exe in.
> Or does "installed correctly" mean something different? I imagine it
> could...
I'm seeing the same thing. Must be a bug.
--
JJZolx
Jim
---
JJZolx;275732 Wrote:
>
> No, it's just telling you that LAME is installed correctly on the
> system in case you want to user the bitrate limiting.
Sorry - I'm not being clear.
It indicated that lame was correctly installed -before- I'd copied
lame.exe in.
Or does "installed correctly" mean somet
bobkoure;275721 Wrote:
> BTW, I turned this off all those beta versions ago because I wanted to
> be sure the server wasn't transcoding.
> I -assume- that I can control this through Settings/players/player
> name/audio - and then set a rate in the "Bit rate limiting" field. Do I
> have that right
Oh - OK.
Copying lame.exe to that same directory certainly made that error
message go away.
Thanks!
BTW, I turned this off all those beta versions ago because I wanted to
be sure the server wasn't transcoding.
I -assume- that I can control this through Settings/players/player
name/audio - and the
bobkoure;275626 Wrote:
> Any thoughts?
Lame.exe is required to do the mp3 conversion from flac, but you have
to install it yourself. If this was working in the past then you must
have deleted lame.exe at some point or else you installed a fresh
version of the server and forgot to reinstall it.
I'd turned the FLAC->MP3 conversion off some beta builds ago.
Now, when I try to turn it on in Settings, I get
-Required binary was not found: lame for flc-mp3-*-*-
Adding FLAC->WAV works fine.
When I search C:\Program Files\SqueezeCenter
- there's a flac.exe
- there's no lame anything (but this
13 matches
Mail list logo
