Re: [slim] So...here we go again.. network issues with Squeezeboxes

2014-03-25 Thread donmacn
Thanks again guys, I've changed to a fixed wifi channel - 6 - along with the other settings. My cordless phones are old, and beginning to play up in other ways, so probably makes sense to change them for newer tech. I just thought I'd come back on the microwave thing though. A while back I was

Re: [slim] So...here we go again.. network issues with Squeezeboxes

2014-03-25 Thread aubuti
donmacn wrote: Removing walls! Yikes! I think I was careless with my language. I guess by building work I mean running cables up through stud walls. I have really easy access underfloor to half of the house, so what I meant was that I could probably drill through the floor and the bottom

[slim] So...here we go again.. network issues with Squeezeboxes

2014-03-24 Thread donmacn
Hi folks, I went to bed last night, everything was hunkydory in squeezebox land. Woke up this morning, and it's clear something's happened during the night, because all the players can't connect. Its a Vortexbox, running LMS 7.8 and a new-ish 'top end' Netgear router. First of all I tried

Re: [slim] So...here we go again.. network issues with Squeezeboxes

2014-03-24 Thread garym
Make sure your router wifi channel setting is set to an actual channel and NOT automatic. Don't use a channel 11, even if available in your part of the world. Use channel 1, 6, or 11 if possible. Also use a channel that doesn't have any nearby users. Something like vistumbler or inSSIDer will

Re: [slim] So...here we go again.. network issues with Squeezeboxes

2014-03-24 Thread donmacn
Gary, Thanks very much. I've had to come in to work (can't sit at home all day trying to get my SBs to play - though it's very tempting!) I'll have another run at it this evening. garym wrote: Make sure your router wifi channel setting is set to an actual channel and NOT automatic. Don't

Re: [slim] So...here we go again.. network issues with Squeezeboxes

2014-03-24 Thread garym
The logging settings I mentioned are NOT the default. On your vortexbox, have you set the IP address to static. You do this in VB webGUI network settings. tick the static address box (instead of dhcp). Then enter the relevant info. use an IP address outside your DHCP range (my range starts at

Re: [slim] So...here we go again.. network issues with Squeezeboxes

2014-03-24 Thread aubuti
donmacn wrote: I'm also starting to wonder about getting into some 'building' work and further strengthening the network by relocating the router into the hallway and connecting it to the PC via a switch. It means running new power spurs; moving the ADSL master socket; a new shelf; etc but

Re: [slim] So...here we go again.. network issues with Squeezeboxes

2014-03-24 Thread garym
aubuti wrote: And, if you start doing some building work, running power spurs, opening/removing walls, etc then you should definitely look into running Cat5e or Cat6 cable to as many SB locations as you can as part of that job. +1. Nothing you can do will be as useful as running actual

Re: [slim] So...here we go again.. network issues with Squeezeboxes

2014-03-24 Thread donmacn
Apologies for the profanities. I tried changing the VB details to static as above, except that somewhere, while I was trying to find out what the local subnet mask was, I found 255.255.255.255 i.e. four times, rather than 255.255.255.0. Now I can't login to my VB on the web interface because I

Re: [slim] So...here we go again.. network issues with Squeezeboxes

2014-03-24 Thread donmacn
What can I say. A bit of wandering around the vortexbox forum and guides, and lots of switching my monitor from PC to VB, I got that sorted. Now it's just a case of restoring the rest of the network around the static IPs. On one hand, I think this is all caused by the SBs and find myself blaming

Re: [slim] So...here we go again.. network issues with Squeezeboxes

2014-03-24 Thread garym
donmacn wrote: What can I say. A bit of wandering around the vortexbox forum and guides, and lots of switching my monitor from PC to VB, I got that sorted. Now it's just a case of restoring the rest of the network around the static IPs. On one hand, I think this is all caused by the SBs

Re: [slim] So...here we go again.. network issues with Squeezeboxes

2014-03-24 Thread garym
donmacn wrote: What can I say. A bit of wandering around the vortexbox forum and guides, and lots of switching my monitor from PC to VB, I got that sorted. Now it's just a case of restoring the rest of the network around the static IPs. On one hand, I think this is all caused by the SBs

Re: [slim] So...here we go again.. network issues with Squeezeboxes

2014-03-24 Thread donmacn
aubuti wrote: Sorry if you've already explained this in one of your earlier threads, but are _any_ of your SBs on a wired ethernet connection? If so, do they suffer from the same connection problems, or is it only wifi? . Ta. ItÂ’s powerline Ethernet. I have a Touch that struggles to connect

Re: [slim] So...here we go again.. network issues with Squeezeboxes

2014-03-24 Thread SlimChances
If the problems recurr there could be interference on the wrieless network from other sources such as garage door openers, cordless phones or microwaves. I had problems with interference from my cordless phone and changing the wireless channel as Garym suggested worked Logitech Media Server

Re: [slim] So...here we go again.. network issues with Squeezeboxes

2014-03-24 Thread garym
SlimChances wrote: If the problems recurr there could be interference on the wrieless network from other sources such as garage door openers, cordless phones or microwaves. I had problems with interference from my cordless phone and changing the wireless channel as Garym suggested worked a