mherger;321475 Wrote:
But hey, Pippin will soon have a solution, he promised ;-)
Well, I didn't promise streaming but playback. And yes, it took me two
days instead of one.
But here it is:
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?p=321704#post321704
It's somewhat experimental and far
mherger;321475 Wrote:
didn't apple open the iPhone api library up so people could write
apps
to it? sounds like a cool idea.
They did. But Softsqueeze is implemented in Java - no option on the
iPhone. And SqueezePlay uses LUA as a scripting engine for most of the
UI.
But Apple
didn't apple open the iPhone api library up so people could write apps
to it? sounds like a cool idea.
They did. But Softsqueeze is implemented in Java - no option on the
iPhone. And SqueezePlay uses LUA as a scripting engine for most of the UI.
But Apple does not allow using scripting
Pooh. That was quick now.
Now I've promised something. Will see what I can put together tonight.
There goes my iPeng schedule ;-)
But I want this...
--
pippin
---
see iPeng at penguinlovesmusic.com
pippin's Profile:
And a new enhancement request ;-)
http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=8803
It's for a stub player that allows you to construct a playlist without
a player attached.
--
pippin
---
see iPeng at penguinlovesmusic.com
mortslim;321034 Wrote:
How about Slim Devices making a version of Softsqueeze that runs native
as an application on the iPhone.
Why?
As a promotional and marketing tool for the Squeezebox.
Say it is a pared down version of Softsqueeze that only streams
shoutcast stations. Then a
pippin;321220 Wrote:
And a new enhancement request ;-)
http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=8803
It's for a stub player that allows you to construct a playlist without
a player attached.
you can use something like WMP to create the play list. Just make sure
you save it in whatever
raaurora;321234 Wrote:
you can use something like WMP to create the play list. Just make sure
you save it in whatever folder SC looks for playlists and also save it
in a format SC can read (.m3u).
I know. But that's not what this request is about ;-)
--
pippin
---
see iPeng at
How about Slim Devices making a version of Softsqueeze that runs native
as an application on the iPhone.
Why?
As a promotional and marketing tool for the Squeezebox.
Say it is a pared down version of Softsqueeze that only streams
shoutcast stations. Then a little message saying if you want
And if Slim Devices can't get Apple to approve this proposed application
for their App Store, then as an alternative, set up softsqueeze as a Web
Application for the iPhone, similar to Stitcher and FlyTunes.
--
mortslim
mortslim;321089 Wrote:
And if Slim Devices can't get Apple to approve this proposed application
for their App Store, then as an alternative, set up softsqueeze as a Web
Application for the iPhone, similar to Stitcher and FlyTunes.
Let'em just fix bug 6266 and I'll do that within a day in
What's needed to fix bug 6266? Is this related to the Tuner issue?
--
andyg
andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49991
andyg;321113 Wrote:
What's needed to fix bug 6266? Is this related to the Tuner issue?
No. This is to be able to load media FILES (not streams) with iPhone.
So the links to the .mp3 files (for mp3 files) that are already in the
songinfo page could be used to play a file.
You can use that to
Oh OK, just have the server support Range requests, that's trivial. I
assume this is only an issue if you try to seek in a file? This
solution won't handle non-mp3/aac/alac files though, as there is no
transcoding built in to the download feature.
--
andyg
andyg;321120 Wrote:
Oh OK, just have the server support Range requests, that's trivial. I
assume this is only an issue if you try to seek in a file? This
solution won't handle non-mp3/aac/alac files though, as there is no
transcoding built in to the download feature.
I think iPhone ALWAYS
Well I got it working. Looks like Mobile Safari tries lots of different
ranges to see what works best, maybe some sort of bandwidth detection.
On my wifi network it ends up doing a ton of requests for only 63 bytes
at a time. Quite inefficient and puts quite a load on the server but at
least
Oops I think that was just a bug in the response header causing it to
send all those extra requests. It actually buffers the whole file very
fast. :)
--
andyg
andyg's Profile:
OK, it's checked in. Sorry for not doing that sooner.
--
andyg
andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49991
18 matches
Mail list logo
