Re: [slim] Frustrated by softsqueeze

2010-01-18 Thread MelonMonkey
My personal suggestion (and what I do): Run Squeezeslave (headless) instead. Then simply control it from your web browser. Unobtrusive, low CPU usage, 0 CPU usage when idle, essentially transparent. -- MelonMonkey Bruno *'Twisted Melon - External Wired IR Blasters'

Re: [slim] Frustrated by softsqueeze

2010-01-16 Thread bpa
More info will always help. Assuming you are using v3.9b1 and SBS 7.4.x Do you have a real player and so verify that SBS is running OK ? Normally Softsqueeze is started from the WebUI of your SBS. Softsqueeze detects a working SBS from broadcats info. So if SOftsqueeze cannot see your SBS and

Re: [slim] Frustrated by softsqueeze

2010-01-16 Thread fredpb
bpa;506985 Wrote: More info will always help. Assuming you are using v3.9b1 and SBS 7.4.xYes Do you have a real player and so verify that SBS is running OK ?Yes Normally Softsqueeze is started from the WebUI of your SBS. Softsqueeze detects a working SBS from broadcats info. So if

Re: [slim] Frustrated by softsqueeze

2010-01-16 Thread bpa
Softsqueeze usually discovers the SBS - if on the same PC it will use localhost so perhaps your security s/w has removed localhost definition. -- bpa bpa's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1806