JohnSwenson wrote:
The software supports TOSLINK on both the wandboard and CSP boards, and
coax on the CSP boards, BUT the outputs on the CSP boards will be much
better. The outputs are ground isolated and reclocked with an ultra low
jitter clock. The coax output is also properly
volpone wrote:
In my setup i would prefer to use an external DAC (Rega DAC) but i'm
very pleased that digital outputs will be good.
But if you only want to use an external DAC, wouldn't a raspberry pi
work for you?
To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
Julf wrote:
But if you only want to use an external DAC, wouldn't a raspberry pi
work for you?
Depends on the DAC. The Raspberry Pi has only USB and HDMI - no SPDIF.
And its USB is known to be a bit dodgy. It works fine with some USB
DACs, but not with others. (Don't know anything about its
hi,
access points (in most cases) are always shit...
The only good way to manage Access points is one switch feeds all of
them only via LAN.
If any works as a repeater you just get the half of its capacity because
he must send the ack from the client back to the server - if that works
just
cliveb wrote:
Depends on the DAC. The Raspberry Pi has only USB and HDMI - no SPDIF.
And its USB is known to be a bit dodgy. It works fine with some USB
DACs, but not with others. (Don't know anything about its HDMI).
Thank's Julf and Cliveb
My goal is to get, as soon as possible, a SB Touch
volpone wrote:
My goal is to get, as soon as possible, a SB Touch alternative or
replacement for my HIFI digital setup and the most important point is
audio quality associated with Rega external DAC (or other good external
audiophile DAC).
Well, Rega makes a point about their USB input
DJanGo wrote:
hi,
access points (in most cases) are always shit...
The only good way to manage Access points is one switch feeds all of
them only via LAN.
If any works as a repeater you just get the half of its capacity because
he must send the ack from the client back to the server
tandy1000rl wrote:
Have my needs outgrown Squeezebox's capabilities? Any other thoughts on
this?
Sorry I can't test.
I surmise that in the group of 18, 12 (or so) get ready to play, but
their readiness status expires before the other 6 are ready too, so the
whole group is never ready to
I may have missed it, but I didn't see anyone talking about the Surface
RT tablet from Microsoft as a replacement for Squeezebox devices.
Like original poster on this thread, I have my music on a Windows Home
Server system (HP Datavault), including MP3s and FLAC files, some of
which are 24-bit
Using the Surface RT would be interesting.
I wonder if we can compile LMS and Squeezelite and side load/install
them on the Surface RT?
qnology's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59703
View this
epoch1970 wrote:
Sorry I can't test.
I surmise that in the group of 18, 12 (or so) get ready to play, but
their readiness status expires before the other 6 are ready too, so the
whole group is never ready to startÂ…
Have you tweaked settingsadvancednetworkSynchronized Players Startup
Delay
11 matches
Mail list logo
